A Systematic Review of Video Analytics Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning—A Survey

2021 ◽  
pp. 659-666
Author(s):  
Prashant Narayankar ◽  
Vishwanath P. Baligar
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Video Analytics

scholarly journals Automatic Pulmonary Nodule Detection Applying Deep Learning or Machine Learning Algorithms to the LIDC-IDRI Database: A Systematic Review

Diagnostics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Pehrson ◽  
Michael Nielsen ◽  
Carsten Ammitzbøl Lauridsen
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Lung Nodules ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Feature Based ◽  
High Level ◽  
Meta Analyses

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the literature available on machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to the Lung Image Database Consortium Image Collection (LIDC-IDRI) database as a tool for the optimization of detecting lung nodules in thoracic CT scans. This systematic review was compiled according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only original research articles concerning algorithms applied to the LIDC-IDRI database were included. The initial search yielded 1972 publications after removing duplicates, and 41 of these articles were included in this study. The articles were divided into two subcategories describing their overall architecture. The majority of feature-based algorithms achieved an accuracy >90% compared to the deep learning (DL) algorithms that achieved an accuracy in the range of 82.2%–97.6%. In conclusion, ML and DL algorithms are able to detect lung nodules with a high level of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity using ML, when applied to an annotated archive of CT scans of the lung. However, there is no consensus on the method applied to determine the efficiency of ML algorithms.

scholarly journals OTHR-12. The development of machine learning algorithms for the differentiation of glioma and brain metastases – a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii17
Author(s):  
Waverly Rose Brim ◽  
Leon Jekel ◽  
Gabriel Cassinelli Petersen ◽  
Harry Subramanian ◽  
Tal Zeevi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Search Strategy ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions

Abstract Purpose Medical staging, surgical planning, and therapeutic decisions are significantly different for brain metastases versus gliomas. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have been developed to differentiate these pathologies. We performed a systematic review to characterize ML methods and to evaluate their accuracy. Methods Studies on the application of machine learning in neuro-oncology were searched in Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane trials (CENTRAL) and Web of science core-collection. A search strategy was designed in compliance with a clinical librarian and confirmed by a second librarian. The search strategy comprised of controlled vocabulary including artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, magnetic resonance imaging, and glioma. The initial search was performed in October 2020 and then updated in February 2021. Candidate articles were screened in Covidence by at least two reviewers each. A bias analysis was conducted in agreement with TRIPOD, a bias assessment tool similar to CLAIM. Results Twenty-nine articles were used for data extraction. Four articles specified model development for solitary brain metastases. Classical ML (cML) algorithms represented 85% of models used, while deep learning (DL) accounted for 15%. cML algorithms performed with an average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 82%, 78%, 88%, respectively; DL performed 84%, 79%, 81%. The support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was the most common used cML model in the literature and convolutional neural networks (CNN) were standard for DL models. We also found T1, T1 post-gadolinium and T2 sequences were most commonly used for feature extraction. Preliminary TRIPOD analysis yielded an average score of 14.25 (range 8–18). Conclusion ML algorithms that can accurately classify glioma from brain metastases have been developed. SVM and CNN are leading approaches with high accuracy. Standardized algorithm performance reporting is a clear limitation to be addressed in future studies.

scholarly journals Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systems in Diagnosing Malignant Thyroid Nodules on Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 186-193
Author(s):  
Lei Xu ◽  
Junling Gao ◽  
Quan Wang ◽  
Jichao Yin ◽  
Pengfei Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Computer Aided Diagnosis ◽  
Cad Systems ◽  
Cad System ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Background: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are being applied to the ultrasonographic diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules, but it remains controversial whether the systems add any accuracy for radiologists. Objective: To determine the accuracy of CAD systems in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the diagnostic performance of CAD systems. The diagnostic performance was assessed by pooled sensitivity and specificity, and their accuracy was compared with that of radiologists. The present systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019134460). Results: Nineteen studies with 4,781 thyroid nodules were included. Both the classic machine learning- and the deep learning-based CAD system had good performance in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules (classic machine learning: sensitivity 0.86 [95% CI 0.79–0.92], specificity 0.85 [95% CI 0.77–0.91], diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 37.41 [95% CI 24.91–56.20]; deep learning: sensitivity 0.89 [95% CI 0.81–0.93], specificity 0.84 [95% CI 0.75–0.90], DOR 40.87 [95% CI 18.13–92.13]). The diagnostic performance of the deep learning-based CAD system was comparable to that of the radiologists (sensitivity 0.87 [95% CI 0.78–0.93] vs. 0.87 [95% CI 0.85–0.89], specificity 0.85 [95% CI 0.76–0.91] vs. 0.87 [95% CI 0.81–0.91], DOR 40.12 [95% CI 15.58–103.33] vs. DOR 44.88 [95% CI 30.71–65.57]). Conclusions: The CAD systems demonstrated good performance in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules. However, experienced radiologists may still have an advantage over CAD systems during real-time diagnosis.

NIMG-23. MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN GLIOMA GRADE PREDICTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi133-vi133
Author(s):  
Ryan Bahar ◽  
Sara Merkaj ◽  
W R Brim ◽  
Harry Subramanian ◽  
Tal Zeevi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Controlled Vocabulary ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Clinical Implementation ◽  
Grade Prediction ◽  
Full Text Review ◽  
Average Patient

Abstract PURPOSE Machine learning (ML) technologies have demonstrated highly accurate prediction of glioma grade, though it is unclear which methods and algorithms are superior. We have conducted a systematic review of the literature in order to identify the ML applications most promising for future research and clinical implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature review, in agreement with PRISMA, was conducted by a university librarian in October 2020 and verified by a second librarian in February 2021 using four databases: Cochrane trials (CENTRAL), Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science core-collection. Keywords and controlled vocabulary included artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, radiomics, magnetic resonance imaging, glioma, and glioblastoma. Screening of publications was done in Covidence, and TRIPOD was used for bias assessment. RESULTS The search identified 11,727 candidate articles with 1,135 articles undergoing full text review. 86 articles published since 1995 met the criteria for our study. 79% of the articles were published between 2018 and 2020. The average glioma prediction accuracy of the highest performing model in each study was 90% (range: 53% to 100%). The most common algorithm used for cML studies was Support Vector Machine (SVM) and for DL studies was Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). BRATS and TCIA datasets were used in 47% of the studies, with the average patient number of study datasets being 186 (range: 23 to 662). The average number of features used in machine learning prediction was 55 (range: 2 to 580). Classical machine learning (cML) was the primary machine learning model in 68% of studies, with deep learning (DL) used in 32%. CONCLUSIONS Using multimodal sequences in ML methods delivers significantly higher grading accuracies than single sequences. Potential areas of improvement for ML glioma grade prediction studies include increasing sample size, incorporating molecular subtypes, and validating on external datasets.

scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence and Reflections from Educational Landscape: A Review of AI Studies in Half a Century

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 800
Author(s):  
Aras Bozkurt ◽  
Abdulkadir Karadeniz ◽  
David Baneres ◽  
Ana Elena Guerrero-Roldán ◽  
M. Elena Rodríguez
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Higher Education ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Adaptive Learning ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Learning Processes ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Research Themes

Artificial intelligence (AI) has penetrated every layer of our lives, and education is not immune to the effects of AI. In this regard, this study examines AI studies in education in half a century (1970–2020) through a systematic review approach and benefits from social network analysis and text-mining approaches. Accordingly, the research identifies three research clusters (1) artificial intelligence, (2) pedagogical, and (3) technological issues, and suggests five broad research themes which are (1) adaptive learning and personalization of education through AI-based practices, (2) deep learning and machine Learning algorithms for online learning processes, (3) Educational human-AI interaction, (4) educational use of AI-generated data, and (5) AI in higher education. The study also highlights that ethics in AI studies is an ignored research area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document