Gadodiamide injection at 0.1 and 0.3 mmol/kg body weight: a phase III double-blind, parallel, randomised clinical investigation of known or suspected cenctral nervous system lesions at 1.5 T

Background: Anemia is one of the most prevalent complications in patients with chronic kidney disease, which is believed to be caused by the insufficient synthesis of erythropoietin by the kidney. This phase III study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CinnaPoietin® (epoetin beta, CinnaGen) with Eprex® (epoetin alfa, Janssen Cilag) in the treatment of anemia in ESRD hemodialysis patients. Methods: In this randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel, and non-inferiority trial, patients were randomized to receive either CinnaPoietin® or Eprex® for a 26-week period. The primary endpoints of this study were to assess the mean hemoglobin (Hb) change during the last 4 weeks of treatment from baseline along with the evaluation of the mean weekly epoetin dosage per kilogram of body weight that was necessary to maintain the Hb level within 10–12 g/dL during the last 4 weeks of treatment. As the secondary objective, safety was assessed along with other efficacy endpoints. Results: A total of 156 patients were included in this clinical trial. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups regarding the mean Hb change (p = 0.21). In addition, the mean weekly epoetin dosage per kg of body weight for maintaining the Hb level within 10–12 g/dL showed no statistically significant difference between treatment arms (p = 0.63). Moreover, both products had comparable safety profiles. However, the incidence of Hb levels above 13 g/dL was significantly lower in the CinnaPoietin® group. Conclusion: CinnaPoietin® was proved to be non-inferior to Eprex® in the treatment of anemia in ESRD hemodialysis patients. The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03408639).

Download Full-text

Body weight response with anamorelin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with anorexia/cachexia: Pooled analysis of two phase III trials.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.10097 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 10097-10097 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

David Christopher Currow ◽

Jennifer S. Temel ◽

Amy Pickar Abernethy ◽

John Friend ◽

Ruben Giorgino

Keyword(s):

Weight Loss ◽

Body Weight ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

Phase Iii ◽

P Value ◽

Double Blind ◽

Entire Study ◽

Ghrelin Receptor ◽

Nsclc Patients

10097 Background: Anorexia/cachexia commonly occurs in patients with advanced NSCLC and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in NSCLC patients with cachexia, the ghrelin receptor agonist anamorelin was well tolerated and significantly increased body weight, lean and fat mass, and anorexia/cachexia symptom burden over 12 weeks compared to placebo (Temel J. Lancet Oncol. 2016). Since an involuntary weight loss of ≥ 5% is an established diagnostic criterion for cancer anorexia/cachexia, an analysis was conducted to assess the proportion of patients with ≥ 5% increase in body weight. Methods: NSCLC patients [ROMANA 1 (NCT01387269; N = 484) and ROMANA 2 (NCT01387282; N = 495)] with stage III/IV disease and cachexia (BMI < 20 kg/m2 or ≥ 5% weight loss during prior 6 months) were randomized 2:1 to receive 100 mg once daily oral anamorelin or placebo up to 12 weeks. A pooled analysis was conducted post-hoc in the modified intent-to-treat population (N = 829) to measure the proportion of patients with ≥ 5% increase in body weight at the end of study (or last observation carried forward since week 6 or 9). Results: The percentage of patients with ≥ 5% increase in body weight at the end of study was significantly higher in the anamorelin arm (N = 188/552, 34.1%) compared to placebo (N = 37/277; 13.4%). Among patients with BMI < 20kg/m2 at baseline (N = 182), 47.3% (N = 53/112) of anamorelin patients had a weight increase of ≥ 5% compared to 17.4% (N = 12/69) in the placebo arm. In both cases the nominal p-value was lower than 0.0001. Conclusions: Data from two published large pivotal studies in advanced NSCLC patients with anorexia/cachexia suggest that anamorelin treatment effect size on body weight is clinically relevant, as shown by the higher response rate achieved when the stringent cut-off of ≥ 5% weight gain was applied. The proportion of patients with BMI < 20kg/m2 that benefited from anamorelin treatment was greater than the proportion of patients who benefited in the entire study sample, suggesting that patients with more advanced cachexia may still benefit from anamorelin treatment. Clinical trial information: ROMANA 1: NCT01387269; ROMANA 2: NCT01387282.

Download Full-text

Double-Blind, Randomized, Three-Armed, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Investigation to Evaluate the Benefit and Tolerability of Two Dosages of IQP-AE-103 in Reducing Body Weight in Overweight and Moderately Obese Subjects

Journal of Obesity ◽

10.1155/2019/3412952 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-12 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ralf Uebelhack ◽

Udo Bongartz ◽

Stephanie Seibt ◽

Gordana Bothe ◽

Pee Win Chong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Weight Loss ◽

Body Weight ◽

Placebo Group ◽

Body Fat ◽

Dose Group ◽

Low Dose ◽

Clinical Investigation ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

High Dose ◽

Double Blind

Objective. This study was performed to determine the efficacy and tolerability/safety of IQP-AE-103 on body weight reduction in overweight to moderately obese adults. Methods. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involved one hundred and eight subjects (BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m2) that were randomly assigned to either the low-dose or the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group, or the placebo group. Following a 2-week run-in period, subjects received two capsules of investigational product after three daily main meals for 12 weeks. Subjects were instructed to maintain a nutritionally balanced hypocaloric diet according to the individual’s energy requirement. Body weight, body fat, and waist and hip circumference were measured at baseline, and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Subjects also rated their feelings of hunger and fullness using visual analogue scales, and food craving on a 5-point scale at the same time intervals. Blood samplings for safety laboratory parameters were taken before and at the end of the study. Results. After 12 weeks of intake, the high-dose IQP-AE-103 group had a significantly greater weight loss compared with the placebo (5.03 ± 2.50 kg vs. 0.98 ± 2.06 kg, respectively; p<0.001) and the low-dose group (3.01 ± 2.19 kg; p=0.001). The high-dose group experienced a decrease in body fat of 3.15 ± 2.41 kg compared with a decrease of 0.23 ± 2.74 kg for the placebo group (p<0.001). High-dose IQP-AE-103 also decreased the feeling of hunger in 66% subjects. A beneficial effect of IQP-AE-103 on the lipid metabolism was also demonstrated in the subgroup of subjects with baseline total cholesterol levels above 6.2 mmol/L. No side effects related to the intake of IQP-AE-103 were reported. Conclusions. These findings indicate that IQP-AE-103 could be an effective and safe weight loss intervention. This trial is registered with NCT03058367.

Download Full-text