scholarly journals Breast clinical target volume: HU-based glandular CTVs and ESTRO CTVs in modern and historical radiotherapy treatment planning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marciana Nona Duma ◽  
Theresa Kulms ◽  
Stefan Knippen ◽  
Tobias Teichmann ◽  
Andrea Wittig
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Clinical Target Volume ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Glandular Tissue ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Anatomic Landmarks ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Safety Margins

Abstract Purpose The current study aimed to compare contouring of glandular tissue only (gCTV) with the clinical target volume (CTV) as defined according to European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) guidelines (eCTV) and historically treated volumes (marked by wire and determined by palpation and anatomic landmarks) in breast cancer radiotherapy. Methods A total of 56 consecutive breast cancer patients underwent treatment planning based solely on anatomic landmarks/wire markings (“wire based”). From these treatment plans, the 50% and 95% isodoses were transferred as structures and compared to the following CT-based volumes: eCTV; a Hounsfield unit (HU)-based automatic contouring of the gCTV; and standardized planning target volumes (PTVs) generated with 1‑cm safety margins (resulting in the ePTVs and gPTVs, respectively). Results The 95% isodose volume of the wire-based plan was larger than the eCTV by 352.39 ± 176.06 cm3 but smaller than the ePTV by 157.58 ± 189.32 cm3. The 95% isodose was larger than the gCTV by 921.20 ± 419.78 cm3 and larger than the gPTV by 190.91 ± 233.49 cm3. Patients with larger breasts had significantly less glandular tissue than those with small breasts. There was a trend toward a lower percentage of glandular tissue in older patients. Conclusion Historical wire and anatomic landmarks-based treatment planning sufficiently covers the glandular tissue and the theoretical gPTV generated for the glandular tissue. Modern CT-based CTV and PTV definition according to ESTRO results in a larger treated volume than the historical wire-based techniques. HU-standardized glandular tissue contouring results in a significantly smaller CTV and might be an option for reducing the treatment volume and improving reproducibility of contouring between institutions.

Geometric contour variation in clinical target volume of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer radiotherapy: an AIRO multi-institutional study

2021 ◽  
pp. 20201177
Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Leonardi ◽  
Matteo Pepa ◽  
Simone Giovanni Gugliandolo ◽  
Rosa Luraschi ◽  
Sabrina Vigorito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Clinical Target Volume ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Radiotherapy Planning ◽  
Axillary Lymph Nodes ◽  
Dice Similarity Coefficient ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Objectives: To determine interobserver variability in axillary nodal contouring in breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy (RT) by comparing the clinical target volume of participating single centres (SC-CTV) with a gold-standard CTV (GS-CTV). Methods: The GS-CTV of 3 patients (P1, P2, P3) with increasing complexity was created in DICOM format from the median contour of axillary CTVs drawn by BC experts, validated using the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation and peer-reviewed. GS-CTVs were compared with the correspondent SC-CTVs drawn by radiation oncologists, using validated metrics and a total score (TS) integrating all of them. Results: Eighteen RT centres participated in the study. Comparative analyses revealed that, on average, the SC-CTVs were smaller than GS-CTV for P1 and P2 (by −29.25% and −27.83%, respectively) and larger for P3 (by +12.53%). The mean Jaccard index was greater for P1 and P2 compared to P3, but the overlap extent value was around 0.50 or less. Regarding nodal levels, L4 showed the highest concordance with the GS. In the intra patient comparison, L2 and L3 achieved lower TS than L4. Nodal levels showed discrepancy with GS which was not statistically significant for P1, and negligible for P2, while P3 had the worst agreement. DICE Similarity Coefficient did not exceed the minimum threshold for agreement of 0.70 in all the measurements. Conclusions: Substantial differences were observed between SC- and GS-CTV, especially for P3 with altered arm set-up. L2 and L3 were the most critical levels. The study highlighted these key points to address. Advances in knowledge The present study compares, by means of validated geometric indexes, manual segmentationsof axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer from different observers and different institutionsmade on radiotherapy planning computed tomography images. Assessing such variability is ofparamount importance, as geometric uncertainties might lead to incorrect dosimetry andcompromise oncological outcome.

scholarly journals MRI reduces variation of contouring for boost clinical target volume in breast cancer patients without surgical clips in the tumour bed

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noora Al-Hammadi ◽  
Palmira Caparrotti ◽  
Saju Divakar ◽  
Mohamed Riyas ◽  
Suparna Halsnad Chandramouli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Target Volume ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Observer Variation ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ct And Mri

Abstract Background Omitting the placement of clips inside tumour bed during breast cancer surgery poses a challenge for delineation of lumpectomy cavity clinical target volume (CTVLC). We aimed to quantify inter-observer variation and accuracy for CT- and MRI-based segmentation of CTVLC in patients without clips. Patients and methods CT- and MRI-simulator images of 12 breast cancer patients, treated by breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy, were included in this study. Five radiation oncologists recorded the cavity visualization score (CVS) and delineated CTVLC on both modalities. Expert-consensus (EC) contours were delineated by a senior radiation oncologist, respecting opinions of all observers. Inter-observer volumetric variation and generalized conformity index (CIgen) were calculated. Deviations from EC contour were quantified by the accuracy index (AI) and inter-delineation distances (IDD). Results Mean CVS was 3.88 +/− 0.99 and 3.05 +/− 1.07 for MRI and CT, respectively (p = 0.001). Mean volumes of CTVLC were similar: 154 +/− 26 cm3 on CT and 152 +/− 19 cm3 on MRI. Mean CIgen and AI were superior for MRI when compared with CT (CIgen: 0.74 +/− 0.07 vs. 0.67 +/− 0.12, p = 0.007; AI: 0.81 +/− 0.04 vs. 0.76 +/− 0.07; p = 0.004). CIgen and AI increased with increasing CVS. Mean IDD was 3 mm +/− 1.5 mm and 3.6 mm +/− 2.3 mm for MRI and CT, respectively (p = 0.017). Conclusions When compared with CT, MRI improved visualization of post-lumpectomy changes, reduced interobserver variation and improved the accuracy of CTVLC contouring in patients without clips in the tumour bed. Further studies with bigger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.

Positron emission mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (01) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Farahati ◽  
A. G. Müller ◽  
E. Gillman ◽  
M. Hentschel ◽  
F. H. H. Müller
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Glandular Tissue ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Malignant Tumours ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Positron Emission Mammography ◽  
Positron Emission

SummaryAim: To evaluate the diagnostic value (sensitivity, specificity) of positron emission mammography (PEM) in a single site non-interventional study using the maximum PEM uptake value (PUVmax). Patients, methods: In a singlesite, non-interventional study, 108 patients (107 women, 1 man) with a total of 151 suspected lesions were scanned with a PEM Flex Solo II (Naviscan) at 90 min p.i. with 3.5 MBq 18F-FDG per kg of body weight. In this ROI(region of interest)-based analysis, maximum PEM uptake value (PUV) was determined in lesions, tumours (PUVmaxtumour), benign lesions (PUVmaxnormal breast) and also in healthy tissues on the contralateral side (PUVmaxcontralateral breast). These values were compared and contrasted. In addition, the ratios of PUVmaxtumour / PUVmaxcontralateral breast and PUVmaxnormal breast / PUVmaxcontralateral breast were compared. The image data were interpreted independently by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians and compared with histology in cases of suspected carcinoma. Results: Based on a criteria of PUV>1.9, 31 out of 151 lesions in the patient cohort were found to be malignant (21%). A mean PUVmaxtumour of 3.78 ± 2.47 was identified in malignant tumours, while a mean PUVmaxnormal breast of 1.17 ± 0.37 was reported in the glandular tissue of the healthy breast, with the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean ratio between tumour and healthy glandular tissue in breast cancer patients (3.15 ± 1.58) was found to be significantly higher than the ratio for benign lesions (1.17 ± 0.41, p < 0.001). Conclusion: PEM is capable of differentiating breast tumours from benign lesions with 100% sensitivity along with a high specificity of 96%, when a threshold of PUVmax >1.9 is applied.

Contribution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining Lumpectomy Cavity in Breast Radiotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 997-1003
Author(s):  
Ozlem Demircioglu ◽  
Huseyin Tepetam ◽  
Ayfer Ay Eren ◽  
Zerrin Ozgen ◽  
Fatih Demircioglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Supine Position ◽  
Radiotherapy Planning ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Radiotherapy ◽  
Lumpectomy Cavity ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mean Diameter ◽  
Ct And Mri

Background: Accurate localization of the lumpectomy cavity is important for breast cancer radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), but the LC localization based on CT is often difficult to delineate accurately. The study aimed to compare CT-defined LC planning to MRI-defined findings in the supine position for higher soft-tissue resolution of MRI. Methods: Fifty-nine breast cancer patients underwent radiotherapy CT planning in supine position followed by MR imaging on the same day. LC was contoured by the radiologist and radiation oncologist together by CT and MRI separately. T2 weighted MR images and tomography findings were combined and the LC volume, mean diameter and the longest axis length were measured after contouring. Subsequently, patients were divided into two groups according to seroma in LC and the above-mentioned parameters were compared. Results: We did not find any statistically significant difference in the LC volume, mean diameter and length at the longest axis between CT and MRI but based on the presence or absence of seroma, statistically significant differences were found in the LC volumes and the length at the longest axis of LC volumes. Conclusion: We believe that the supine MRI in the same position with CT will be more effective for radiotherapy planning, particularly in patients without a seroma in the surgical cavity.

PH-0163: Harmonization of breast cancer radiotherapy treatment planning in the Netherlands

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S77-S78
Author(s):  
M. Verhoeven ◽  
M. Sangen van der ◽  
C. Hurkmans ◽  
L. Boersma ◽  
K. Verhoeven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Radiotherapy Treatment Planning ◽  
Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Radiotherapy Treatment

scholarly journals An observational study of post-operative Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT) of breast cancer by immobilizing patients on All-in-one (AIOTM) solution Breast and Lung Board without usingthermoplastic mask: Risk of collusion of gantry with couch exists if acquisition of Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)is attempted for set-up verification.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramaiah Vinay Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Unilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Planar Image ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Set Up

Abstract Background: Automatic Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based image matching for set-up verification is recommended as compared to 2-D match for post-operative local / loco-regional radiotherapy of breast cancer patients by Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. However, in supine position, off-midline peripheral body Clinical Target Volume (CTV) of unilateral breast cancer patients immobilized on Breast and Lung board of All-in-One (AIO) positioning systemmay necessitate augmented movement of couch in ‘x’ and ‘z’ axis thereby raising the risk of collusion of x-ray sources / detectors system with couch. Methods and Materials: VMAT was planned by a pair of partial arc for whole target volume for seven consecutive post-operative breast cancer patients (five post-mastectomy and two post-breast conservation patients). Tattoo based set-up by shift of treatment table in x-, y- and z-axis as determined by Treatment Planning System followed by X-rays with planar image acquisition and online 2-D imaging matching was performed for set-up verification. In-room 360°rotation of x-ray source and detector system of linear accelerator (linac) was performed before x-ray planar image acquisition. Results: Completion of 360°rotation in-room of x-ray source and detector system of linacaround the machine iso-centre was not possible in six out of seven patients due to possibility of collusion of gantry with contralateral side of the couch. Conclusion: Performing CBCT for generating 3D images for computed tomography (CT) reconstruction may not be practical for patient set-up verification of post-operative radiotherapy of unilateral breast cancer patients positioned supine on breast and lung board.

scholarly journals Voluntary deep inspiration breath-hold reduces the heart dose without compromising the target volume coverage during radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noora Al-Hammadi ◽  
Palmira Caparrotti ◽  
Carole Naim ◽  
Jillian Hayes ◽  
Katherine Rebecca Benson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Deep Inspiration ◽  
Random Errors ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold ◽  
Cardiac Dose

Abstract Background During radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer, parts of the heart are irradiated, which may lead to late toxicity. We report on the experience of single institution with cardiac-sparing radiotherapy using voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (V-DIBH) and compare its dosimetric outcome with free breathing (FB) technique. Patients and methods Left-sided breast cancer patients, treated at our department with postoperative radiotherapy of breast/chest wall +/– regional lymph nodes between May 2015 and January 2017, were considered for inclusion. FB-computed tomography (CT) was obtained and dose-planning performed. Cases with cardiac V25Gy ≥ 5% or risk factors for heart disease were coached for V-DIBH. Compliant patients were included. They underwent additional CT in V-DIBH for planning, followed by V-DIBH radiotherapy. Dose volume histogram parameters for heart, lung and optimized planning target volume (OPTV) were compared between FB and BH. Treatment setup shifts and systematic and random errors for V-DIBH technique were compared with FB historic control. Results Sixty-three patients were considered for V-DIBH. Nine (14.3%) were non-compliant at coaching, leaving 54 cases for analysis. When compared with FB, V-DIBH resulted in a significant reduction of mean cardiac dose from 6.1 +/– 2.5 to 3.2 +/– 1.4 Gy (p < 0.001), maximum cardiac dose from 51.1 +/– 1.4 to 48.5 +/– 6.8 Gy (p = 0.005) and cardiac V25Gy from 8.5 +/– 4.2 to 3.2 +/– 2.5% (p < 0.001). Heart volumes receiving low (10–20 Gy) and high (30–50 Gy) doses were also significantly reduced. Mean dose to the left anterior coronary artery was 23.0 (+/– 6.7) Gy and 14.8 (+/– 7.6) Gy on FB and V-DIBH, respectively (p < 0.001). Differences between FB- and V-DIBH-derived mean lung dose (11.3 +/– 3.2 vs. 10.6 +/– 2.6 Gy), lung V20Gy (20.5 +/– 7 vs. 19.5 +/– 5.1 Gy) and V95% for the OPTV (95.6 +/– 4.1 vs. 95.2 +/– 6.3%) were non-significant. V-DIBH-derived mean shifts for initial patient setup were ≤ 2.7 mm. Random and systematic errors were ≤ 2.1 mm. These results did not differ significantly from historic FB controls. Conclusions When compared with FB, V-DIBH demonstrated high setup accuracy and enabled significant reduction of cardiac doses without compromising the target volume coverage. Differences in lung doses were non-significant.

WHAT ANATOMIC FEATURES GOVERN PERSONAL LONG-TERM HEALTH RISKS FROM BREAST CANCER RADIOTHERAPY?

2019 ◽  
Vol 186 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 381-385
Author(s):  
Pavel Kundrát ◽  
Cristoforo Simonetto ◽  
Markus Eidemüller ◽  
Julia Remmele ◽  
Hannes Rennau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Health Risks ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Radiotherapy ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Risk Variability ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Breast cancer radiotherapy may in the long term lead to radiation-induced secondary cancer or heart disease. These health risks hugely vary among patients, partially due to anatomy-driven differences in doses deposited to the heart, ipsilateral lung and contralateral breast. We identify four anatomic features that largely cover these dosimetric variations to enable personalized risk estimates. For three exemplary, very different risk scenarios, the given parameter set reproduces 63–74% of the individual risk variability for left-sided breast cancer patients. These anatomic features will be used in the PASSOS software to support decision processes in breast-cancer therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document