scholarly journals Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (11) ◽  
pp. 3101-3117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish K. Pandey ◽  
Sunil Chaudhari ◽  
Diego Jarquin ◽  
Pasupuleti Janila ◽  
Jose Crossa ◽  
...  

Abstract Key message Comparative assessment identified naïve interaction model, and naïve and informed interaction GS models suitable for achieving higher prediction accuracy in groundnut keeping in mind the high genotype × environment interaction for complex traits. Abstract Genomic selection (GS) can be an efficient and cost-effective breeding approach which captures both small- and large-effect genetic factors and therefore promises to achieve higher genetic gains for complex traits such as yield and oil content in groundnut. A training population was constituted with 340 elite lines followed by genotyping with 58 K ‘Axiom_Arachis’ SNP array and phenotyping for key agronomic traits at three locations in India. Four GS models were tested using three different random cross-validation schemes (CV0, CV1 and CV2). These models are: (1) model 1 (M1 = E + L) which includes the main effects of environment (E) and line (L); (2) model 2 (M2 = E + L + G) which includes the main effects of markers (G) in addition to E and L; (3) model 3 (M3 = E + L + G + GE), a naïve interaction model; and (4) model 4 (E + L + G + LE + GE), a naïve and informed interaction model. Prediction accuracy estimated for four models indicated clear advantage of the inclusion of marker information which was reflected in better prediction accuracy achieved with models M2, M3 and M4 as compared to M1 model. High prediction accuracies (> 0.600) were observed for days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, hundred seed weight, oleic acid, rust@90 days, rust@105 days and late leaf spot@90 days, while medium prediction accuracies (0.400–0.600) were obtained for pods/plant, shelling  %, and total yield/plant. Assessment of comparative prediction accuracy for different GS models to perform selection for untested genotypes, and unobserved and unevaluated environments provided greater insights on potential application of GS breeding in groundnut.

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (01) ◽  
pp. 63-73
Author(s):  
M. V. Nagesh Kumar ◽  
V. Ramya ◽  
C. V. Sameer Kumar ◽  
T. Raju ◽  
N. M. Sunil Kumar ◽  
...  

Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] is an important pulse crop grown under Indian rainfed agriculture. Twenty eight pigeonpea genotypes were tested for stability and adaptability across ten rainfed locations in the States of Telangana and Karnataka, India using AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) model and GGE (genotype and genotype by environment) biplot method. The grain yields were significantly affected by environment (56.8%) followed by genotype × environment interaction (27.6%) and genotype (18.6%) variances. Two mega environments were identified with several winning genotypes viz., ICPH 2740 (G15), TS 3R (G10), PRG 176 (G8) and ICPL 96058 (G22). E2 (Gulbarga, Karnataka), E3 (Bidar, Karnataka) and E6 (Vikarabad, Telangana) were the most discriminating environments. Genotypes, ICPH 2740, PRG 176 and TS 3R were the best cultivars in all the environments whereas PRG 158 (G9), ICPL 87119 (G12), ICPL 20098 (G19) and ICPL 96058 (G22) were suitable across a wide range of environments. Genotypes, ICPH 2740 and PRG 176 can be recommended on a large scale to the farmers with small holdings to enhance pigeonpea productivity and improve the food security


Genetika ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 509-522
Author(s):  
Zeljko Lakic ◽  
Igor Balalic ◽  
Svetko Vojin

The aim of this field study was to evaluate genotype ? year interaction for spike length, 1000 seed weight, seed number per g and hectoliter mass in perennial ryegrass, using eight divergent genotypes across two growing seasons. Interaction was evaluated using AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction) model. All traits schowed additive (genotype, year) and non additive (genotype ? year interaction) variation. On the basis od AMMI1 biplot genotype G4 showed most stability for all examined traits, so it can be recommended for sowing in different environmental conditions. Also, the genotype G4 could be used in the creation of new local varieties of perennial ryegrass.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-307
Author(s):  
ANMS Karim ◽  
S Ahmed ◽  
AH Akhi ◽  
MZA Talukder ◽  
TA Mujahidi

Nine single cross promising maize hybrids and three check varieties (NK40, BHM9 and 900 MGold) were assessed for genotype environment interaction (GEI) and stability for the selection of promising one(s) in seven different locations of Bangladesh. The AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) model was used to analyze the genotype-environment interaction over seven locations to select desired hybrid having higher yield and other potential attributes. Regarding genotypes (G), significant variation was found in all the characters except yield while environment (E) was found significant for all the characters. The environment of Gazipur was poor; Jamalpur, Hathazari, Ishurdi, Rahmatpur, Burirhat, and Jessore were positive environments for tested maize hybrids. Considering the mean, bi and S2di for all the parameters, it was evident that all the genotypes showed different response of adaptability under different environmental conditions. Among the hybrids E12 (900MG), E7(CML502 × CML491), E1(BIL95 × BIL28), E10 (NK40) and E2 (BIL95 × BIL31) were exhibited high yielder.Considering bi ̴1(regression co-efficient), S2di ̴ 0 (deviation from regression)and mean versace IPCA1 (fig1)indicated that hybrids E7and E1showed the higher yield as well as stable across locations.Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 43(2): 301-307, June 2018


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-350
Author(s):  
Meijin Ye ◽  
Zhaoyang Chen ◽  
Bingbing Liu ◽  
Haiwang Yue

Stability and adaptability of promising maize hybrids in terms of three agronomic traits (grain yield, ear weight and 100-kernel weight) in multi-environments trials were evaluated. The analysis of AMMI model indicated that the all three agronomic traits showed highly significant differences (p < 0.01) on genotype, environment and genotype by environment interaction. Results showed that genotypes Hengyu321 (G9), Yufeng303 (G10) and Huanong138 (G3) were of higher stability on grain yield, ear weight and 100-kernel weight, respectively. Genotypes Hengyu1587 (G8) and Hengyu321 (G9) showed good performance in terms of grain yield, whereas Longping208 (G2) and Weike966 (G12) showed broad adaptability for ear weight. It was also found that the genotypes with better adaptability in terms of 100-kernel weight were Zhengdan958 (G5) and Weike966 (G12). The genotype and environment interaction model based on AMMI analysis indicated that Hengyu1587 and Hengyu321 were the ideal genotypes, due to extensive adaptability and high grain yield under both testing sites. Bangladesh J. Bot. 50(2): 343-350, 2021 (June)


Author(s):  
Zahra Abbasi ◽  
Jan Bocianowski

AbstractThe objective of this study was to assess genotype by environment interaction for 21 physiological traits in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) parents and hybrids grown in Rodasht Agricultural Research Station in Iran by the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. The study comprised of 51 sugar beet genotypes [10 multigerm pollen parents, four monogerm seed parents and 36 F1 hybrids], evaluated at four environments in a randomized complete block design, with three replicates. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analyses revealed significant environment main effects with respect to all observed traits, except extraction coefficient of sugar. The additive main effects and multiplicative interaction stability values ranged from 0.009 (G17 for leaf Ca2+) to 9.698 (G09 for extraction coefficient of sugar). The parental forms 2 7233-P.29 (G38) and C CMS (G49) as well as hybrids 2(6)*C (G27) and 5*C (G33) are recommended for further inclusion in the breeding programs because of their stability and good average values of observed traits.


1975 ◽  
Vol 191 (1104) ◽  
pp. 387-411 ◽  

The responses of two characters, number of sternopleural chaetae and total yield of offspring (which depends on the mother’s genotype), to change in the temperature at which the flies were raised and type of culture container in which they bred were followed in the two inbred lines, Wellington (Well) and Samarkand (Sam). In respect of chaeta number Well was more sensitive to change of the environment than Sam, which furthermore responded in the opposite direction to Well. In respect of yield of offspring the two lines responded similarly. The genetic control of these responses to environmental change was investigated by using the eight substitution lines which comprise all the possible true breeding combinations of the three major chromosomes (X, II and III) from Well and Sam. Two experiments were carried out, the first a diallel experiment at three temperatures (18, 21.5 and 25 °C), and the second an experiment in which the eight lines were raised in nine environments comprising all combinations of the three temperatures and three types of culture. Chaeta number changes more with temperature than with type of culture, whereas the reverse is true of yield of offspring. In respect of chaeta number the genes chiefly responsible for response to environmental change are borne on a different chromosome (II) than those chiefly responsible for variation in mean chaeta number (III), and there are indications of a similar situation in respect of yield of offspring. It is concluded that different characters are separately adjustable by selection in their responses to enviromental change, that sensitivity of a character to environmental change is adjustable separately from mean expression of the character, and that the detailed patterns of response to a range of environments (e. g. temperatures) are separable from the magnitude of the overall change induced by these environments.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Aliya Momotaz ◽  
Per H. McCord ◽  
R. Wayne Davidson ◽  
Duli Zhao ◽  
Miguel Baltazar ◽  
...  

Summary The experiment was carried out in three crop cycles as plant cane, first ratoon, and second ratoon at five locations on Florida muck soils (histosols) to evaluate the genotypes, test locations, and identify the superior and stable sugarcane genotypes. There were 13 sugarcane genotypes along with three commercial cultivars as checks included in this study. Five locations were considered as environments to analyze genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) in 13 genotypes in three crop cycles. The sugarcane genotypes were planted in a randomized complete block design with six replications at each location. Performance was measured by the traits of sucrose yield tons per hectare (SY) and commercial recoverable sugar (CRS) in kilograms of sugar per ton of cane. The data were subjected to genotype main effects and genotype × environment interaction (GGE) analyses. The results showed significant effects for genotype (G), locations (E), and G × E (genotype × environment interaction) with respect to both traits. The GGE biplot analysis showed that the sugarcane genotype CP 12-1417 was high yielding and stable in terms of sucrose yield. The most discriminating and non-representative locations were Knight Farm (KN) for both SY and CRS. For sucrose yield only, the most discriminating and non-representative locations were Knight Farm (KN), Duda and Sons, Inc. USSC, Area 5 (A5), and Okeelanta (OK).


1981 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. De PAUW ◽  
D. G. FARIS ◽  
C. J. WILLIAMS

Three cultivars of each crop, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), oats (Avena sativa L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), were grown for 4 yr at five locations north of the 55th parallel in northwestern Canada. There were highly significant differences among all main effects and interactions. Galt barley produced the highest seed yield followed by Centennial barley, Random oats and Harmon oats. Victory oats, Olli barley, Neepawa wheat and Pitic 62 wheat yielded similarly to each other while Thatcher wheat was significantly lower yielding. Mean environment yields ranged from 2080 to 5610 kg/ha. The genotype-environment (GE) interaction of species and cultivars was sufficiently complicated that it could not be characterized by one or two statistics (e.g., stability variances or regression coefficients). However, variability in frost-free period among years and locations contributed to the GE interaction because, for example, some cultivars yielded well (e.g., Pitic 62) only in those year-location environments with a relatively long frost-free period while other early maturing cultivars (e.g., Olli) performed well even in a short frost-free period environment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document