Dry anaerobic ammonia–methane production from chicken manure

2009 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatma Abouelenien ◽  
Yoshiaki Kitamura ◽  
Naomichi Nishio ◽  
Yutaka Nakashimada
Keyword(s):  
Methane Production ◽  
Chicken Manure

Bioaugmentation with a propionate-degrading methanogenic culture to improve methane production from chicken manure

2021 ◽  
pp. 126607
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Changrui Wang ◽  
Xinrui Xu ◽  
Yongming Sun ◽  
Tao Xing
Keyword(s):  
Methane Production ◽  
Chicken Manure

Study of Methane Production by High Temperature Anaerobic Fermentation of Chicken Manure and Stalks

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-557
Author(s):  
Yongku Li ◽  
Xiaomin Hu ◽  
Lei Feng
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Production Rate ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Anaerobic Fermentation ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Chicken Manure ◽  
Biogas Slurry ◽  
Production Rates

The changing parameters, as the biogas production rate, the methane production rate, the cumulative biogas amount, the cumulative methane amount, the biogas composition, pH etc. in high temperature anaerobic fermentation of chicken manure and stalks were analyzed by experiments with different mass ratios of chicken manure or livestock manure and stalks with a high C/N ratio. The methane production mechanism of high temperature anaerobic digestion of chicken manure and stalks was discussed in detail. It showed that not only the biogas production rates but also the methane production rates of R1–R7 demonstrated the trend of initial increase and then decrease after 50 d of high temperature anaerobic digestion. Besides, the gas production of R1 with pure chicken manure stopped on the 30th d of the reaction. The gas production of other groups R2–R7 also stopped on the corresponding 34th, 36th, 36th, 37th, 37th, and 37th day, respectively. At the end of the reaction, the cumulative biogas amounts and the cumulative methane amounts of R1–R7 were 411.58 and 269.54, 459.91 and 314.41, 425.32 and 294.11, 401.85 and 272.54, 382.63 and 257.07, 363.04 and 218.16, and 257.15 and 160.10 N ml/(g VS). The biogas slurry pH of R1–R7 all demonstrated a trend of initial decrease and then increase, e. g., pH of R2 reached the minimum of 5.94 on the 5th day. pH values of other groups were between 6.01 and 6.39. After the addition of 4 g of sodium bicarbonate on the 7th day, biogas slurry pH of R1–R7 all increased. pH was maintained between 7.16 and 7.44 until the end of the reaction.

Evaluating Methane Production from Anaerobic Mono- and Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste, Corn Stover, and Chicken Manure

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 2085-2091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeqing Li ◽  
Ruihong Zhang ◽  
Xiaoying Liu ◽  
Chang Chen ◽  
Xiao Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Corn Stover ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Chicken Manure ◽  
Kitchen Waste

scholarly journals Case Study: Pathways from Forest to Energy in a Circular Economy at Lafões

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana d’Espiney ◽  
Isabel Paula Marques ◽  
Helena Maria Pinheiro
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Chicken Manure ◽  
Forest Residues ◽  
Energy Potential ◽  
Broiler Production ◽  
Energy Conversion Systems ◽  
Present Case Study ◽  
Methane Production Potential

The present case study deals with new pathways in demand for forest residues disposal in the Lafões region (Portugal), since this biomass is presently regarded as a residue and eliminated through open air burning. Different biomass-to-energy conversion systems have a high sustainability value and, thus, the energy potential of the biomass supplied by the forest of Lafões was assessed, using GIS-based methods and assumptions from the literature. The Lafões region produces large amounts of chicken manure from which energy can be recovered through anaerobic digestion. The energy potential held by the effluent of the several classes of the poultry industry of Lafões was assessed, using IPCC 2006 guidelines to estimate their biomass and methane production potential. Furthermore, integrated solutions were pursued. The present challenge is to explore complementarities between effluents for anaerobic digestion to achieve improved energy and waste management system performances. The complementarity between the residues from maritime pine forest management and from broiler production was assessed through bench-scale anaerobic co-digestion assays, leading to increased methane production when compared to those achieved with single substrate anaerobic digestion. This result highlights the interest of further research concerning complementarities between other effluents in the Lafões region.

scholarly journals Optimization of Biomethane Production via Fermentation of Chicken Manure Using Marine Sediment: A Modeling Approach Using Response Surface Methodology

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (22) ◽  
pp. 11988
Author(s):  
Fatma Abouelenien ◽  
Toyokazu Miura ◽  
Yutaka Nakashimada ◽  
Nooran S. Elleboudy ◽  
Mohammad S. Al-Harbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Surface Methodology ◽  
Response Surface ◽  
Marine Sediment ◽  
Incubation Time ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Total Solid ◽  
Solid Content ◽  
Chicken Manure ◽  
Total Solid Content ◽  
Semi Solid

In this study, marine sediment (MS) was successfully used as a source of methanogenic bacteria for the anaerobic digestion (AD) of chicken manure (CM). Using MS showed high production in liquid and semi-solid conditions. Even in solid conditions, 169.3 mL/g volatile solids of chicken manure (VS-CM) was produced, despite the accumulation of ammonia (4.2 gNH3-N/kg CM). To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest methane production from CM alone, without pretreatment, in solid conditions (20%). Comparing MS to Ozouh sludge (excess activated sewage sludge) (OS), using OS under semi-solid conditions resulted in higher methane production, while using MS resulted in more ammonia tolerance (301 mL/gVS-CM at 8.58 gNH3-N/kg). Production optimization was carried out via a response surface methodology (RDM) model involving four independent variables (inoculum ratio, total solid content, NaCl concentration, and incubation time). Optimized methane production (324.36 mL/gVS-CM) was at a CM:MS ratio of 1:2.5 with no NaCl supplementation, 10% total solid content, and an incubation time of 45 days.

scholarly journals METHANE PRODUCTION BY ANAEROBIC DIGESTION FROM CATTLE DUNG AND CHICKEN MANURE UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1308-1326
Author(s):  
A. S. El-Sayed ◽  
T. A. Mehana ◽  
M. A. Abdel-Hadi ◽  
A. M. Mustafa
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Chicken Manure ◽  
Cattle Dung ◽  
Laboratory Conditions

scholarly journals Performance Evaluation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure with Algal Digestate

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Na Duan ◽  
Xia Ran ◽  
Ruirui Li ◽  
Panagiotis Kougias ◽  
Yuanhui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Substrate Concentration ◽  
Tap Water ◽  
Total Solid ◽  
Ammonia Concentration ◽  
Chicken Manure ◽  
Resource Saving ◽  
Kinetics Parameters ◽  
Total Ammonia

Dilution is considered to be a fast and easily applicable pretreatment for anaerobic digestion (AD) of chicken manure (CM), however, dilution with fresh water is uneconomical because of the water consumption. The present investigation was targeted at evaluating the feasibility and process performance of AD of CM diluted with algal digestate water (AW) for methane production to replace tap water (TW). Moreover, the kinetics parameters and mass flow of the AD process were also comparatively analyzed. The highest methane production of diluted CM (104.39 mL/g volatile solid (VS)) was achieved with AW under a substrate concentration of 8% total solid (TS). The result was markedly higher in comparison with the group with TW (79.54–93.82 mL/gVS). Apart from the methane production, considering its energy and resource saving, nearly 20% of TW replaced by AW, it was promising substitution to use AW for TW to dilute CM. However, the process was susceptible to substrate concentration, inoculum, as well as total ammonia and free ammonia concentration.

scholarly journals Biomethanation Potential (BMP) Study of Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Abundant Bio-Wastes in Southern Regions of Tunisia

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Mawaheb Mouftahi ◽  
Nawel Tlili ◽  
Nejib Hidouri ◽  
Pietro Bartocci ◽  
Khalideh Al bkoor Alrawashdeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Methane Production ◽  
Energy Demand ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Renewable Energy Sources ◽  
Chicken Manure ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Batch Mode ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Initial Content ◽  
Nitrogen Ratio

Tunisia is a country that suffers from energy demand problems and environmental matters. Thus, Tunisian authorities desire to encourage the development of renewable energy sources, especially from biological processes, like anaerobic digestion. Therefore, this study is focused on the evaluation of biogas and bio-methane yield from the co-digestion of three available and abundant bio-wastes in the southern regions of Tunisia. The three different raw materials are an organic fraction of municipal solid waste, chicken manure, and olive mill wastewater. In this context, experimental work to evaluate the potential of biogas and bio-methane production was carried out at mesophilic temperature 35 °C and batch mode. The present work highlights the possibility of generating biogas from these organic wastes and reducing the amounts of the wastes to dispose of in landfills. The experimental study of the co-digestion process under specific conditions of carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N), T, pH, and inoculums to substrate ratio ISR provided a high yield of net methane and net biogas, in comparison with other research works. Results showed a higher specific net methane production per kg of volatile solids, which is equal to 0.338 Nm3 methane/kg VS and 0.430 Nm3 methane/kg VS for two studied cases. The obtained volatile solids reduction was found to be 91% of the initial content, for a hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 40 days.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document