scholarly journals Commentary on: “Occupational radiation exposure of medical staff performing 90Y-loaded microsphere radioembolization”

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 822-823
Author(s):  
Vanessa L. Gates ◽  
Ahmed Gabr ◽  
Joseph Kallini ◽  
Robert J. Lewandowski ◽  
Riad Salem
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Occupational Radiation Exposure ◽  
Occupational Radiation

Occupational radiation exposure of medical staff performing 90Y-loaded microsphere radioembolization

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 824-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Laffont ◽  
Yan Rolland ◽  
Valérie Ardisson ◽  
Julien Edeline ◽  
Marc Pracht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Occupational Radiation Exposure ◽  
Occupational Radiation

scholarly journals Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and occupational radiation exposure assessed using local data

2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Karipidis ◽  
G. Benke ◽  
M. R. Sim ◽  
L. Fritschi ◽  
C. Vajdic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Local Data ◽  
Occupational Radiation Exposure ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Occupational Radiation

scholarly journals Occupational Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Aortic Procedures

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Patel ◽  
D. Gallacher ◽  
R. Dourado ◽  
O. Lyons ◽  
A. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Occupational Radiation Exposure ◽  
Occupational Radiation

scholarly journals Comparative occupational radiation exposure between fixed and mobile imaging systems

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Kendrick ◽  
Claire P. Miller ◽  
Pamela A. Moorehead ◽  
Ann H. Kim ◽  
Henry R. Baele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Imaging Systems ◽  
Occupational Radiation Exposure ◽  
Mobile Imaging ◽  
Occupational Radiation

Impact of considering non-occupational radiation exposure on the association between occupational dose and solid cancer among French nuclear workers

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Fournier ◽  
Enora Cléro ◽  
Eric Samson ◽  
Sylvaine Caër-Lorho ◽  
Dominique Laurier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Exposure ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Occupational Radiation Exposure ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Work Related ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Occupational Radiation

ObjectivesThe French nuclear worker cohort allows for the assessment of cancer risk associated with occupational radiation exposure, but workers are also exposed to medical and environmental radiation which can be of the same order of magnitude. This study aims to examine the impact of non-occupational radiation exposures on the dose-risk analysis between occupational radiation exposure and cancer mortality.MethodsThe cohort included workers employed before 1995 for at least one year by CEA, AREVA NC or EDF and badge-monitored for external radiation exposure. Monitoring results were used to calculate occupational individual doses. Scenarios of work-related X-ray and environmental exposures were simulated. Poisson regression was used to quantify associations between occupational exposure and cancer mortality adjusting for non-occupational radiation exposure.ResultsThe mean cumulative dose of external occupational radiation was 18.4 mSv among 59 004 workers. Depending on the hypotheses made, the mean cumulative work-related X-ray dose varied between 3.1 and 9.2 mSv and the mean cumulative environmental dose was around 130 mSv. The unadjusted excess relative rate of cancer per Sievert (ERR/Sv) was 0.34 (90% CI −0.44 to 1.24). Adjusting for environmental radiation exposure did not substantially modify this risk coefficient, but it was attenuated by medical exposure (ERR/Sv point estimate between 0.15 and 0.23).ConclusionsOccupational radiation risk estimates were lower when adjusted for work-related X-ray exposures. Environmental exposures had a very slight impact on the occupational exposure risk estimates. In any scenario of non-occupational exposure considered, a positive but insignificant excess cancer risk associated with occupational exposure was observed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document