Projected Landscape Impacts from Oil and Gas Development Scenarios in the Permian Basin, USA

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-363
Author(s):  
Jon Paul Pierre ◽  
John R. Andrews ◽  
Michael H. Young ◽  
Alexander Y. Sun ◽  
Brad D. Wolaver
2016 ◽  
Vol 562 ◽  
pp. 906-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zacariah L. Hildenbrand ◽  
Doug D. Carlton ◽  
Brian E. Fontenot ◽  
Jesse M. Meik ◽  
Jayme L. Walton ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joshua F. Valder ◽  
Ryan R. McShane ◽  
Joanna N. Thamke ◽  
Jeremy S. McDowell ◽  
Grady P. Ball ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 824
Author(s):  
Haoying Wang

The environmental impact of shale energy development is a growing concern in the US and worldwide. Although the topic is well-studied in general, shale development’s impact on drylands has received much less attention in the literature. This study focuses on the effect of shale development on land cover in the Permian Basin region—a unique arid/semi-arid landscape experiencing an unprecedented intensity of drilling and production activities. By taking advantage of the high-resolution remote sensing land cover data, we develop a fixed-effects panel (longitudinal) data regression model to control unobserved spatial heterogeneities and regionwide trends. The model allows us to understand the land cover’s dynamics over the past decade of shale development. The results show that shale development had moderate negative but statistically significant impacts on shrubland and grassland/pasture. The effect is more strongly associated with the hydrocarbon production volume and less with the number of oil and gas wells drilled. Between shrubland and grassland/pasture, the impact on shrubland is more pronounced in terms of magnitude. The dominance of shrubland in the region likely explains the result.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 50-59
Author(s):  
O. P. Trubitsina ◽  
V. N. Bashkin

The article is devoted to the consideration of geopolitical challenges for the analysis of geoenvironmental risks (GERs) in the hydrocarbon development of the Arctic territory. Geopolitical risks (GPRs), like GERs, can be transformed into opposite external environment factors of oil and gas industry facilities in the form of additional opportunities or threats, which the authors identify in detail for each type of risk. This is necessary for further development of methodological base of expert methods for GER management in the context of the implementational proposed two-stage model of the GER analysis taking to account GPR for the improvement of effectiveness making decisions to ensure optimal operation of the facility oil and gas industry and minimize the impact on the environment in the geopolitical conditions of the Arctic.The authors declare no conflict of interest


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document