International Staging System predicts prognosis of Chinese patients with multiple myeloma across different calendar periods with application of novel agents

2011 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-Hsiang Yang ◽  
Hao-Wei Teng ◽  
Ying-Chung Hong ◽  
Chun-Yu Liu ◽  
Yuan-Bin Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
International Staging System

scholarly journals The Applicability of the International Staging System in Chinese Patients with Multiple Myeloma Receiving Bortezomib or Thalidomide-Based Regimens as Induction Therapy: A Multicenter Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Lu ◽  
Jin Lu ◽  
Aijun Liu ◽  
Weijun Fu ◽  
Juan Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Prognostic System ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
International Staging System

The International Staging System (ISS) is the most important prognostic system for multiple myeloma (MM). It was identified in the era of conventional agents. The outcome of MM has significantly changed by novel agents. Thus the applicability of ISS system in the era of novel agents in Chinese patients needs to be demonstrated. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes and prognostic significance of ISS system in 1016 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in Chinese patients between 2008 and 2012, who received bortezomib- or thalidomide-based regimens as first-line therapy. The median overall survival (OS) of patients for ISS stages I/II/III was not reached/55.4 months/41.7 months (p<0.001), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 30/29.5/25 months (p=0.072), respectively. Statistically significant difference in survival was confirmed among three ISS stages in thalidomide-based group, but not between ISS stages I and II in bortezomib-based group. These findings suggest that ISS system can predict the survival in the era of novel agents in Chinese MM patients, and bortezomib may have the potential to partially overcome adverse effect of risk factors on survival, especially in higher stage of ISS system.

scholarly journals Comprehensive evaluation of the revised international staging system in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents as a primary therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (12) ◽  
pp. 1280-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyungwoo Cho ◽  
Dok Hyun Yoon ◽  
Jung Bok Lee ◽  
Sung-Yong Kim ◽  
Joon Ho Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Primary Therapy ◽  
International Staging System

Bortezomib in Combination with Dexamethasone and Subsequent Thalidomide for Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in Chinese Patients.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4827-4827
Author(s):  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Weiyan Zheng ◽  
Guoqing Wei ◽  
Xiujin Ye ◽  
Jingsong He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
International Staging System ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bortezomib-dexamethasone-thalidomide has been reported to be effective in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with an overall response rate of 92% and a CR rate of 18% (Alexanian et al, Hematology12(3):235–239, 2007), but this regimen has not been reported in Chinese patients. We now report our experience with this combination. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of bortezomib in combination of dexamethasone plus subsequent thalidomide as primary treatment for MM. Patients and Method: Between June 2006 and August 2007, 11 consecutive newly-diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM were treated with bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, dexamethasone at 20 mg/m2 IV daily on the day of bortezomib and the day after. All patients received daily oral thalidomide that was escalated from 100 mg to 200 mg. Seven of 11 patients were male and 4 were female. Median age was 57 years (range 47–86). Seven of 11 patients were stage 2 according to the International Staging System, 4 out of 11 patients were stage 3. Eleven patients received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range 1–6). The Blade criteria were used for response evaluation. Toxicities were evaluated according to the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 3. Results: Nine out of 11 patients (82%) achieved PR and 2 (18%) achieved CR; therefore the overall response rate was 100%. With a median follow-up duration of 5 months (1– 14 months), no patients died. Grade 3–4 toxicities included fatigue (3/11), thrombocytopenia (3/11), diarrhea (3/11) and orthostatic hypotension (2/11). Grade 2 neuropathy occurred in 3 out of 11 patients, herpes zoster occurred in 3 out of 11 patients. Routine anticoagulation or anti-thrombosis was not used. There was no DVT/PE in 11 patients. Conclusion: Our preliminary experience indicated that bortezomib-dexamethasone-thalidomide is highly effective in newly-diagnosed MM. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were rare after median 2 cycles of therapy. The relative lower rates of neuropathy and DVT/PE in this report with Chinese MM patients are being cautiously observed.

scholarly journals Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) for Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Risk Stratification

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5756-5756
Author(s):  
Telma Nascimento ◽  
Adriana Roque ◽  
Emília Cortesão ◽  
Luís Francisco Araújo ◽  
Ana Isabel Espadana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
International Staging System

Abstract BACKGROUND: In the last decades, multiple myeloma (MM) prognosis has been changing dramatically. Induction with novel agents, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is the standard of care for newly diagnosed (ND) and transplant-eligible MM patients (pts). In 2015, a new score was validated [Revised International Staging System (R-ISS)], including data related to high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) [del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)] and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Few recent studies have supported R-ISS as a reliable prognostic tool for estimating survival in MM pts submitted to aHSCT. AIMS: To determine whether R-ISS is a valid risk model for predicting progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among a cohort of real-life aHSCT pts. METHODS: We conducted a single center retrospective study of ND symptomatic MM pts treated with novel agents (bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide) undergoing aHSCT between Jan/2007 and Dec/2017. We excluded all pts with no available information about ISS, LDH and CA [detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)]. Response to treatment was evaluated according to the International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria (2016). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v.14.2 and significant levels were set at p<0.05. RESULTS: From the total number of 186 pts submitted to aHSCT, only 81 (45%) pts presented criteria to be included in our analysis; 62% were male, with a median age at aHSCT of 60y (28-70). IgG was the most frequent subtype (59%), followed by IgA (20%). At diagnosis, 38% of pts presented anemia, 14% renal impairment (RI), 20% hypercalcemia, 63% bone disease (BD) and 32% extramedullary disease (EMD). According to ISS, 30 (37%) pts presented stage I, 30 (37%) stage II, and 21 (26%) stage III at diagnosis. There were 38% pts with high-risk CA: 24% with del17p; 19% with t(4;14), and 20% with t(14;16). High LDH levels was seen in 48% of pts. Pts were re-staged at diagnosis according to R-ISS, resulting 17% in stage I, 61% in stage II, and 22% in stage III. Thus, 16 (20%) pts previously categorized as ISS I and 3 (4%) pts as ISS III were re-classified as R-ISS II. Median time from diagnosis to aHSCT was 9.7 months. All pts received induction therapy with novel agents (a bortezomib-based therapy in 89% of pts and an IMID-based in 12%), with 81% of pts responding to first line induction; 19% were refractory. At the time of aHSCT, all pts presented at least on partial response (PR) [62% at least very good partial response (VGPR)], with an increase in the proportion of pts in complete response (CR) from 15% to 20% before and after aHSCT, respectively. Maintenance therapy was performed in 31% of pts (79% thalidomide; 21% lenalidomide). At a median follow-up of 33.4 months, median OS had not been reached. Two-years OS was 62%. Median PFS from aHSCT was 67.4%.Neither high-risk CA nor high LDH levels individually predicted lower OS and PFS (p=NS). The 2-year OS for R-ISS I, II and III was 86 %, 61% and 44%, and the 2-year PFS was 79 %, 63% and 39%, respectively. In our cohort we observed statistical significance differences between R-ISS I and III at 2 years in what concerns PFS (p=0.025) and OS (p=0.017) . No differences were seen in between other R-ISS categories. When we stratified R-ISS stage II in two subgroups based on the presence or absence of high-risk CA no differences were found. Pts classified as R-ISS III presented anemia (p<0.001) and RI (p=0.001) more frequently, but no differences concerning hypercalcemia, BD or EMD. CONCLUSIONS: In our real-life cohort, R-ISS at diagnosis was a reliable tool only to predict both OS and PFS between R-ISS I and III and not between other R-ISS subgroups. The main reasons that explain the absence of significance between all R-ISS subgroups were probably the very low number of pts with available cytogenetics compared with the total number of pts submitted to aHSCT in our center and the short follow up of our study. Larger real-life studies with a longer follow up are necessary to determine if R-ISS is a good risk stratification model to applicate to NDMM pts submitted to aHSCT in the era of novel agents. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy of Triplet Therapy, Including Lenalidomide, in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Obtained Responses Less Than VGPR after Rd Therapy

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5595-5595
Author(s):  
Naoki Takezako ◽  
Naoya Kaneko ◽  
Airi Hamano ◽  
Kenichi Ito ◽  
Naohiro Sekiguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
International Staging System ◽  
Novel Agent

Background Although multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease, the triplet therapy with novel agents has significantly improved the prognosis. However, the utility of the novel agents is often not obtained in transplant-ineligible patients, particularly in unfit or frail patients because of the low tolerance. So, in real world, it is common to use a combination of lenalidomide and low dose dexamethasone (Rd), which are generally dose-adjusted. Certainly, in the elderly patients, triplet therapy including novel agents may be excessive treatment in terms of adverse events. However, patients with only partial response are known to have a poor prognosis, and it is important how to improve their prognosis. At our medical center, we select Rd therapy for elderly patients, except for fit patients, but we have switched to triplet therapy for patients who have not had a response above VGPR. Here, we retrospectively reviewed this treatment outcome. Method We retrospectively reviewed 71 transplant ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who received Rd therapy as initial therapy between November 2015 and March 2019. The median age was 73 years old (range 66~89). Patients received normal Rd therapy (lenalidomide 25 mg/day, day 1-21 (if they have normal renal function) and dexamethasone 20mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22) for every 4 weeks as initial therapy. If the response after 6 cycles was less than VGPR, another novel agent was added and treatment was continued as triplet therapy including lenalidomide. The International Staging System (ISS) were I in 15 (21.1%), II in 45 (63.3%) and III in 11 (15.5%). High-risk cytogenetics, defined as the presence of deletion 17, t(4;14) and t(14;16) by FISH analysis, were identified in 11 (15.4%) patients. The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) were I in 14 (19.7%), II in 49 (69.0%) and III in 8 (11.2%). Results The overall response rate (ORR) after 6 cycles of Rd therapy was obtained in 69 (97.1%). including sCR in 5 (7.0%), CR in 3 (4.2%), VGPR in 23 (32.3%), and PR in 38 (53.5%). SD were observed in 2 patients (2.8%), respectively and they relapsed within six cycles. Twenty-nine out of 38 patients who had a response less than VGPR had changed to a triplet therapy with the addition of some novel agent (13 patients with elotuzumab, 5 patients with carfilzomib, 8 patients with ixazomib, and 3 patients with daratumumab). Forty-nine out of 71 cases (69.0%) achieved a response of at least VGPR, finally. The disease-free survival time was significantly longer in cases which obtained in excess of VGPR (figure). Grade 3 or greater toxicities occurring in 5% within 6 cycles, however, in triplet therapy, 6 patients (20.6%) were suffered from severe adverse events (most were infectious diseases such as pneumonia). Conclusion This retrospective analysis revealed that Rd therapy might be able to improve prognosis if patients obtain more than VGPR and even if treatment response is less than PR in the 6th cycle, triplet therapy might be effective to change the patients' prognosis. However, patients who do not reach VGPR even with triplet therapy have a poor prognosis and need further treatment. This results may be indicate that, in elderly NDMM patients, Rd therapy is sufficiently successful, and it is not always necessary to select triplet therapy as initial from the viewpoint of adverse events. Further study is warranted. Figure Disclosures Teshima: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

PP455 Cost-effectiveness Of Ixazomib-Based Regimen Compared With Bortezomib-Based Regimen In Chinese Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Pei Wang ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Peng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

IntroductionThe treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a common hematological malignancy, remains a great challenge in China, partially due to the limited accessibility to novel agents and inadequate public health insurance coverage. Ixazomib, a novel oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), was approved by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) for RRMM in 2018. While bortezomib, a traditional PI, is the recommended agent in the clinical guideline for MM. Here, we compared their costs and effectiveness.MethodsRRMM patients who has received an ixazomib-based regimen (at least 2 cycles) were analyzed. Using a propensity score matching method, we generated a control group of RRMM patients who received the bortezomib-based regimen. The criteria included the number of treatment lines, age, and the revised international staging system stage (R-ISS) which representing the disease stage for myeloma, and paired at a ratio of 1:2 (allowing one control to match multiples). The difference in hospitalization stay, grade 3/4 adverse events rates, overall response rate (ORR), mortality during treatment, and treatment costs was then compared.ResultsNineteen patients received ixazomib and twenty-seven that received bortezomib were included. The ixazomib-group demonstrated a shorter hospital stay (9 days versus 27 days, p < 0.001), lower grade 3–4 adverse events rates (42.1% versus 55.6%, p < 0.001), higher ORR (63.2% versus 48.1%, p = 0.228), and lower mortality rate during treatment (0% versus 7.4%, p = 0.169) than that of bortezomib-group. The ixazomib group had lower total costs (127,620CNY versus 156,424CNY [18,033USD versus 22,103USD], p > 0.05), lower drug costs (98,376CNY versus 103,307CNY [13,901USD versus 14,598USD], p > 0.05), and the lower costs of supportive treatment (5,507CNY versus 14,701 CNY [778USD versus 2,077USD], p < 0.001). Only in terms of self-funded costs, the bortezomib-based regimen was significantly lower (37,127CNY versus 11,521CNY [5,246USD versus 1,628USD], p < 0.001).ConclusionsCompared with the bortezomib-based regimen, the ixazomib-based regimen has better therapeutic effects on MM patients while saving costs. Hence, it may be preferable for use in the treatment of RRMM in China.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document