scholarly journals Assessment of cervical vascularization density in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma evaluated in colour Doppler and power Doppler functions

Author(s):  
Adam Tomalczyk ◽  
Bartłomiej Tomasik ◽  
Jacek Fijuth ◽  
Malgorzata Moszynska-Zielinska ◽  
Leszek Gottwald

Abstract Purpose The aim of the prospective study was to assess changes during treatment and prognostic significance of cervical vascularization density in patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) staged II B and III B and to find relationship of cervical vascularization density with tumour diameter, grading, staging and age of patients. Methods The study group included 50 patients who underwent transvaginal Doppler ultrasonography prior to chemoradiotherapy, after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and 6 weeks after HDR brachytherapy. The colour Doppler (CD) vascularity index (CDVI) and the power Doppler (PD) vascularity index (PDVI) in cervical tumour were examined. Results CDVI and PDVI values decreased significantly during radiotherapy (0.13 (95% CI 0.09–0.16); 0.09 (95% CI 0.07–0.11) and 0.05 (95% CI 0.03–0.06) for CDVI (p < 0.001) and 0.26 (95% CI 0.22–0.31); 0.18 (95% CI 0.14–0.22) and 0.08 (95% CI 0.06–0.11) for PDVI (p < 0.001)). No statistically significant associations of CDVI and PDVI with tumour diameter, grading, staging and age of patients were found. The higher (above median) CDVI values before EBRT were associated with better OS (p = 0.041). The higher (above median) PDVI values before EBRT were associated with superior DFS (p = 0.011) and OS (p < 0.001). DFS and OS did not differ significantly regarding CDVI and PDVI values after EBRT and after the treatment. Conclusions In the study group, cervical vascularization density evaluated in CD and PD functions did not depend on tumour diameter, grading, staging and age of patients and decreased during radiotherapy. The prognosis for our patients with CDVI and PDVI before the treatment above the median value was better than compared to patients with these parameters below the median value.

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14057-14057
Author(s):  
J. Ahn ◽  
B. Cho ◽  
H. Choi ◽  
H. Jeung ◽  
S. Rha ◽  
...  

14057 Background: Chemoradiation is the standard treatment for anal carcinoma. Mitomycin-C (MMC) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the widely used regimen, but MMC is not a radiation sensitizer and has significant toxicities. This study was conducted to update our experience in treating anal carcinomas with an external beam radiation and continuous infusion of 5-FU with cisplatin. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus were treated between 1995 and 2005. The primary tumor and involved lymph nodes received a total of 41.4–64.8 Gy and 39.6–60.4 Gy, respectively. Chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU (1,000 mg/m2 CI, D1–5 and D36–40) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IVF, D2 and D37) q 4weeks for 4 courses. Results: One patients had T1 lesions, 15 had T2, 7 had T3, and 5 patients had T4 disease. Seventeen patients presented with clinically detectable lymphadenopathy. Eight patients failed to start maintenance chemotherapy due to events during chemoradiation. Of the 19 patients who started maintenance chemotherapy, 3 failed to complete all four courses due to intolerance to chemotherapy. With a median follow-up duration of 68.5 months, the actuarial 5-year OS rate was 83.2 %, the DFS rate 80.7%, and the colostomy-free survival was 91.7%. Patterns of recurrence were local relapses in 3 patients, distant metastases in 2, and both in 1, respectively. Seventeen patients (60.7%) developed moist skin reaction, which frequently caused the interruption of radiotherapy. Principal grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia in 10 patients (35.8%) and thrombocytopenia in 4 (14.2%). The most common late complications were lymphedema (14.3%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that combined modality therapy with external beam radiation, cisplatin and 5-FU yields an excellent outcome in terms of survival and sphincter preservation which is comparable to the results of MMC regimens. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16012-16012 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Bhatt ◽  
A. Matin ◽  
M. Srivastava ◽  
M. C. Pant ◽  
K. Srivastava ◽  
...  

16012 Background: Locally advanced carcinoma cervix patients are treated by a combination of external beam radiation and brachytherapy. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy has been an active area of investigation in such patients. In this present study, we have compared two chemotherapy drugs- cisplatinum vs gemcitabine along with radiotherapy in loco-regionally advanced carcinoma cervix with the purpose of evaluating loco-regional disease control and tolerability of these combinations. Methods: This study was undertaken on 65 biopsy-proven patients with stage IIb- IIIb carcinoma cervix. All patients were treated with 50 Gy of external beam radiation with 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days a week followed by intra-cavitary radiotherapy (ICRT). Dose of ICRT delivered by high dose rate brachytherapy was 18 Gy by either of the two schedules, viz. 3 fractions of 6 Gy at weekly interval or 2 fractions of 9 Gy each at one week apart. The concurrent chemotherapy was either inj. Cisplatinum 35 mg/m2 IVI weekly (control group), or inj. gemcitabine 150 mg/m2 IVI weekly (Study group). Results: A total of 65 age and stage matched patients were recruited in the two arms of the study. We analyzed sixty patients who completed the above treatment protocol with 32 patients in control group and 28 in study group. Eighty-nine percent patients in study group had complete response (CR) to the above combination treatment vs. 72% CR in control arm (p< 0.05). However, overall response rate (CR+ PR) was similar in both the groups (96% in study group vs. 100% in control group). No patient in both the groups had grade IV skin reaction with only one patient in study group developing grade III skin toxicity. Grade III gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was higher in study group as compared to controls (14% vs. 3%) with none of the patients experiencing grade IV GI toxicity. No other significant toxicity was encountered in this study. Conclusions: We can conclude that synchronous chemo-radiotherapy using either gemcitabine or cisplatinum as radiation sensitizer is feasible in locally advanced carcinoma cervix with similar overall response rate and acute toxicity profile with a significantly higher complete response rate when gemcitabine is used as a chemotherapeutic drug. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Divyesh Kumar ◽  
G. Y. Srinivasa ◽  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Bhavana Rai ◽  
Arun S. Oinam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Carcinoma cervix is amongst the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in women population worldwide. High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) post external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care in managing locally advanced stage cervical cancer patients. HDR-ICBT is generally performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in operation theatre (OT), but due to logistic reasons, sometimes, it becomes difficult to accommodate all patients under GA. Since prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) makes the results inferior, taking patients in day care setup under procedural sedation (PS) can be an effective alternative. In this audit, we tried to retrospectively analyse the dosimetric difference, if any, in patients who underwent ICBT at our centre, under either GA in OT or PS in day care. Results Thirty five patients were analysed 16/35 (45.71%) patients underwent HDR-ICBT under GA while 19/35 (54.28%) patients under PS. In both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed between the dose received by 0.1 cc as well as 2 cc of rectum (p < 0.05), while the bladder and sigmoid colon had comparable dosages. Conclusion Though our dosimetric analysis highlighted better rectal sparing in patients undergoing HDR-ICBT under GA when compared to patients under PS, PS can still be considered an effective alternative, especially in centres dealing with significant patient load. Further studies are required for firm conclusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document