Diagnostic yield of external loop recording in patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA

2015 ◽  
Vol 262 (3) ◽  
pp. 682-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerben J. J. Plas ◽  
Jorieke Bos ◽  
Bob Oude Velthuis ◽  
Marcoen F. Scholten ◽  
Heleen M. den Hertog ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 194187442110212
Author(s):  
Mohanad AlGaeed ◽  
Manjot Grewal ◽  
Prarthana Hareesh ◽  
Soha Sadeghikhah ◽  
Hai Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: Seizures are a common complication after an ischemic stroke. Electroencephalography can assist with the diagnosis of seizures however, the diagnostic yield of its use when seizure is suspected in the setting of acute ischemic stroke is unknown. We aim to evaluate the yield and cost of EEG in the acute ischemic stroke setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to a single academic tertiary care center in the United States between September 1, 2015 to November 30, 2019 with a primary diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and who were monitored on electroencephalography (EEG) for suspected seizures (total number of 70 patients). The primary outcome was how often EEG monitoring changed clinical management defined as starting, stopping, or changing the dose of an anti-epileptic drug. Secondary analysis was estimating the cost of EEG monitoring per change in management. Results: We identified 126 patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke who underwent EEG of which 70 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. EEG monitoring resulted in a change in management in 22 patients (31%). Predictors associated with EEG monitoring resulting in a change in management were admission to the ICU, pre-existing atrial fibrillation, and symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. Estimated cost of EEG per change in management was $1374.96 USD. Conclusion: EEG monitoring resulted in a changed management in nearly one-third of patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke suspected of having seizures.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuyao Sun ◽  
Malgorzata M Miller ◽  
Nils Henninger

Introduction: American Heart Association guidelines recommend obtaining baseline troponin in all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients to detect an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Yet, data regarding the prevalence and diagnostic yield of troponin elevation in patients presenting within the time window for thrombolysis is limited. We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of cTnI in detecting ACS when assessed before or after 4.5h from last known well (LKW). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 526 consecutive patients admitted for AIS or transient ischemic attack, who presented within 4.5h and had cardiac troponin I (cTnI) obtained within 48h from LKW. Results: The median time from LKW to cTnI measurement was 3.8h (IQR 1.5h-7.9h). 58% patients (n=306) had cTnI obtained ≤ 4.5h from LKW. After adjustment, factors independently relating to an elevated cTnI were the time to cTnI assessment (p<0.001), patient age (p=0.012), history of congestive heart failure (p<0.001), and a history of stroke/TIA (p=0.049). Patients who had a cTnI obtained within 4.5 hours from LKW, had significantly more often a normal (≤0.04 ng/mL) than elevated (>0.04 ng/mL) cTnI levels (61.9% vs. 44.7%; p=0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of an elevated cTnI assessed within 48h from LKW for ACS was 63.6%, 80.2%, and 79.5%, respectively. After stratification by the time to cTnI assessment within 4.5 h versus beyond 4.5h, the sensitivity of an elevated cTnI for ACS was markedly reduced to 42.9% whereas the specificity remained high at 84%. The optimal threshold to assess cTnI for detecting an ACS was 320 min in all included patients (sensitivity = 0.54, specificity = 0.67, Youden’s J = 0.203) and 340 minutes in patients with ACS (sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.88, Youden’s J 0.661). Conclusions: Among patients presenting within the time window for rtPA treatment, the sensitivity of cTnI obtained within 4.5 hours from LKW to detect ACS is low. Our data suggests that cTnI routine assessment of cTnI in AIS subjects without cardiac symptoms should not be done within the first 6 hours from LKW.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Götz Thomalla ◽  
Mira Upneja ◽  
Stephan Camen ◽  
Märit Jensen ◽  
Julian Schröder ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Cardiac ultrasound to identify sources of cardioembolism is part of the diagnostic workup of acute ischemic stroke. Recommendations on whether transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) should be performed in addition to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) are controversial. We aimed to determine the incremental diagnostic yield of TEE in addition to TTE in patients with acute ischemic stroke with undetermined cause. Methods: In a prospective, observational, pragmatic multicenter cohort study, patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack with undetermined cause before cardiac ultrasound were studied by TTE and TEE. The primary outcome was the rate of treatment-relevant findings in TTE and TEE as defined by a panel of experts based on current evidence. Further outcomes included the rate of changes in the assessment of stroke cause after TEE. Results: Between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, we enrolled 494 patients, of whom 492 (99.6%) received TTE and 454 (91.9%) received TEE. Mean age was 64.7 years, and 204 (41.3%) were women. TEE showed a higher rate of treatment-relevant findings than TTE (86 [18.9%] versus 64 [14.1%], P <0.001). TEE in addition to TTE resulted in 29 (6.4%) additional patients with treatment-relevant findings. Among 191 patients ≤60 years additional treatment-relevant findings by TEE were observed in 27 (14.1%) patients. Classification of stroke cause changed after TEE in 52 of 453 patients (11.5%), resulting in a significant difference in the distribution of stroke cause before and after TEE ( P <0.001). Conclusions: In patients with undetermined cause of stroke, TEE yielded a higher number of treatment-relevant findings than TTE. TEE appears especially useful in younger patients with stroke, with treatment-relevant findings in one out of seven patients ≤60 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03411642.


VASA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Tziomalos ◽  
Vasilios Giampatzis ◽  
Stella Bouziana ◽  
Athinodoros Pavlidis ◽  
Marianna Spanou ◽  
...  

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is frequently present in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, there are limited data regarding the association between ankle brachial index (ABI) ≤ 0.90 (which is diagnostic of PAD) or > 1.40 (suggesting calcified arteries) and the severity of stroke and in-hospital outcome in this population. We aimed to evaluate these associations in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patients and methods: We prospectively studied 342 consecutive patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke (37.4 % males, mean age 78.8 ± 6.4 years). The severity of stroke was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)and the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at admission. The outcome was assessed with the mRS and dependency (mRS 2 - 5) at discharge and in-hospital mortality. Results: An ABI ≤ 0.90 was present in 24.6 % of the patients whereas 68.1 % had ABI 0.91 - 1.40 and 7.3 % had ABI > 1.40. At admission, the NIHSS score did not differ between the 3 groups (10.4 ± 10.6, 8.3 ± 9.3 and 9.3 ± 9.4, respectively). The mRS score was also comparable in the 3 groups (3.6 ± 1.7, 3.1 ± 1.8 and 3.5 ± 2.3, respectively). At discharge, the mRS score did not differ between the 3 groups (2.9 ± 2.2, 2.3 ± 2.1 and 2.7 ± 2.5, respectively) and dependency rates were also comparable (59.5, 47.6 and 53.3 %, respectively). In-hospital mortality was almost two-times higher in patients with ABI ≤ 0.90 than in patients with ABI 0.91 - 1.40 or > 1.40 but this difference was not significant (10.9, 6.6 and 6.3 %, respectively). Conclusions: An ABI ≤ 0.90 or > 1.40 does not appear to be associated with more severe stroke or worse in-hospital outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document