The impact of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in resistant migraine patients: a real-world evidence observational study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Torres-Ferrús ◽  
Victor J. Gallardo ◽  
Alicia Alpuente ◽  
Edoardo Caronna ◽  
Eulalia Gine-Cipres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Cannabidiol use and effectiveness: real-world evidence from a Canadian medical cannabis clinic

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucile Rapin ◽  
Rihab Gamaoun ◽  
Cynthia El Hage ◽  
Maria Fernanda Arboleda ◽  
Erin Prosk
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Retrospective Observational Study ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Medical Cannabis ◽  
Specific Symptom ◽  
Pain Anxiety ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Cannabidiol (CBD) is a primary component in the cannabis plant; however, in recent years, interest in CBD treatments has outpaced scientific research and regulatory advancement resulting in a confusing landscape of misinformation and unsubstantiated health claims. Within the limited results from randomized controlled trials, and lack of trust in product quality and known clinical guidelines and dosages, real-world evidence (RWE) from countries with robust regulatory frameworks may fill a critical need for patients and healthcare professionals. Despite growing evidence and interest, no real-world data (RWD) studies have yet investigated patients’ reports of CBD impact on symptom control in the common expression of pain, anxiety, depression, and poor wellbeing. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of CBD-rich treatment on symptom burden, as measured with a specific symptom assessment scale (ESAS-r). Methods This retrospective observational study examined pain, anxiety, depression symptoms, and wellbeing in 279 participants over 18 years old, prescribed with CBD-rich treatment at a network of clinics dedicated to medical cannabis in Quebec, Canada. Data were collected at baseline, 3 (FUP1), and 6 (FUP2) month after treatment initiation. Groups were formed based on symptom severity (mild vs moderate/severe) and based on changes to treatment plan at FUP1 (CBD vs THC:CBD). Two-way mixed ANOVAs were used to assess ESAS-r scores differences between groups and between visits. Results All average ESAS-r scores decreased between baseline and FUP1 (all ps < 0.003). The addition of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) during the first follow-up had no effect on symptom changes. Patients with moderate/severe symptoms experienced important improvement at FUP1 (all ps < 0.001), whereas scores on pain, anxiety, and wellbeing of those with mild symptoms actually increased. Differences in ESAS-r scores between FUP1 and FUP2 were not statistically different. Conclusion This retrospective observational study suggests CBD-rich treatment has a beneficial impact on pain, anxiety, and depression symptoms as well as overall wellbeing only for patients with moderate to severe symptoms; however, no observed effect on mild symptoms. The results of this study contribute to address the myths and misinformation about CBD treatment and demand further investigation.

1607-P: Real-World Evidence of the Impact of Obesity on Residual Teeth in the Japanese Population

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1607-P
Author(s):  
MAYU HAYASHI ◽  
KATSUTARO MORINO ◽  
KAYO HARADA ◽  
MIKI ISHIKAWA ◽  
ITSUKO MIYAZAWA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Japanese Population ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting CGRP: From Clinical Studies to Real-World Evidence—What Do We Know So Far?

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 700
Author(s):  
Theodoros Mavridis ◽  
Christina I. Deligianni ◽  
Georgios Karagiorgis ◽  
Ariadne Daponte ◽  
Marianthi Breza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Real World ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Symptomatic Management ◽  
Repurposed Drugs ◽  
Cephalic Pain

Now more than ever is the time of monoclonal antibody use in neurology. In headaches, disease-specific and mechanism-based treatments existed only for symptomatic management of migraines (i.e., triptans), while the standard prophylactic anti-migraine treatments consist of non-specific and repurposed drugs that share limited safety profiles and high risk for interactions with other medications, resulting in rundown adherence rates. Recent advances in headache science have increased our understanding of the role of calcitonin gene relate peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) pathways in cephalic pain neurotransmission and peripheral or central sensitization, leading to the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or small molecules targeting these neuropeptides or their receptors. Large scale randomized clinical trials confirmed that inhibition of the CGRP system attenuates migraine, while the PACAP mediated nociception is still under scientific and clinical investigation. In this review, we provide the latest clinical evidence for the use of anti-CGRP in migraine prevention with emphasis on efficacy and safety outcomes from Phase III and real-world studies.

scholarly journals Connected health for growth hormone treatment research and clinical practice: learnings from different sources of real-world evidence (RWE)—large electronically collected datasets, surveillance studies and individual patients’ cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nea Boman ◽  
Luis Fernandez-Luque ◽  
Ekaterina Koledova ◽  
Marketta Kause ◽  
Risto Lapatto
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Real World ◽  
Growth Disorders ◽  
Injection Device ◽  
Growth Outcomes ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
High Adherence

Abstract Background A range of factors can reduce the effectiveness of treatment prescribed for the long-term management of chronic health conditions, such as growth disorders. In particular, prescription medications may not achieve the positive outcomes expected because approximately half of patients adhere poorly to the prescribed treatment regimen. Methods Adherence to treatment has previously been assessed using relatively unreliable subjective methods, such as patient self-reporting during clinical follow-up, or counting prescriptions filled or vials returned by patients. Here, we report on a new approach, the use of electronically recorded objective evidence of date, time, and dose taken which was obtained through a comprehensive eHealth ecosystem, based around the easypod™ electromechanical auto-injection device and web-based connect software. The benefits of this eHealth approach are also illustrated here by two case studies, selected from the Finnish cohort of the easypod™ Connect Observational Study (ECOS), a 5-year, open-label, observational study that enrolled children from 24 countries who were being treated with growth hormone (GH) via the auto-injection device. Results Analyses of data from 9314 records from the easypod™ connect database showed that, at each time point studied, a significantly greater proportion of female patients had high adherence (≥ 85%) than male patients (2849/3867 [74%] vs 3879/5447 [71%]; P < 0.001). Furthermore, more of the younger patients (< 10 years for girls, < 12 years for boys) were in the high adherence range (P < 0.001). However, recursive partitioning of data from ECOS identified subgroups with lower adherence to GH treatment ‒ children who performed the majority of injections themselves at an early age (~ 8 years) and teenagers starting treatment aged ≥ 14 years. Conclusions The data and case studies presented herein illustrate the importance of adherence to GH therapy and how good growth outcomes can be achieved by following treatment as described. They also show how the device, software, and database ecosystem can complement normal clinical follow-up by providing HCPs with reliable information about patient adherence between visits and also providing researchers with real-world evidence of adherence and growth outcomes across a large population of patients with growth disorders treated with GH via the easypod™ device.

scholarly journals Real-world evidence on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use and risk of Fournier’s gangrene

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Yufeng Yang ◽  
Tiansheng Wang ◽  
Virginia Pate ◽  
John B Buse ◽  
Til Stürmer
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Fournier’S Gangrene ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratio ◽  
Fournier's Gangrene ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been associated with increased occurrence of Fournier’s gangrene (FG), a rare but serious form of necrotizing fasciitis, leading to a warning from the Food and Drug Administration. Real-world evidence on FG is needed to validate this warning.MethodsWe used data from IBM MarketScan (2013–2017) to compare the incidence of FG among adult patients who initiated either SGLT2i, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), or any non-SGLT2i antihyperglycemic medication. FG was defined using inpatient International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition and Tenth Edition diagnosis codes 608.83 and N49.3, respectively, combined with procedure codes for debridement, surgery, or systemic antibiotics. We estimated crude incidence rates (IRs) using Poisson regression, and crude and adjusted HRs (aHR) and 95% CIs using standardized mortality ratio-weighted Cox proportional hazards models. Sensitivity analyses examined the impact of alternative outcome definitions.ResultsWe identified 211 671 initiators of SGLT2i (n=93 197) and DPP4i (n=118 474), and 305 329 initiators of SGLT2i (n=32 868) and non-SGLT2i (n=272 461). Crude FG IR ranged from 3.2 to 3.8 cases per 100 000 person-years during a median follow-up of 0.51–0.58 years. Compared with DPP4i, SGLT2i initiation was not associated with increased risk of FG for any outcome definition, with aHR estimates ranging from 0.25 (0.04–1.74) to 1.14 (0.86–1.51). In the non-SGLT2i comparison, we observed an increased risk of FG for SGLT2i initiators when using FG diagnosis codes alone, using all diagnosis settings (aHR 1.80; 0.53–6.11) and inpatient diagnoses only (aHR 4.58; 0.99–21.21).ConclusionsNo evidence of increased risk of FG associated with SGLT2i was observed compared with DPP4i, arguably the most relevant clinical comparison. However, uncertainty remains based on potentially higher risk in the broader comparison with all non-SGLT2i antihyperglycemic agents and the rarity of FG.Trial registration numberEUPAS Register Number 30018.

scholarly journals P1.16-07 Real World Evidence of the Impact of Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S588
Author(s):  
C. Pettengell ◽  
J. Law ◽  
L. Le ◽  
M. Sung ◽  
S. Lau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals N15 A ‘real-world’ observational multi-centre study comparing the side effects and patient acceptability of budesonide MMX with prednisolone in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S664-S665
Author(s):  
J Kearns ◽  
L Scullion ◽  
C Masterson ◽  
N Kennedy ◽  
C Butcher
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Real World ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Patient Acceptability ◽  
Multi Centre Study ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Budesonide MMX is indicated for the induction of remission in mild to moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC) patients when 5-ASA treatment is not sufficient. Unlike traditional first-generation glucocorticoid steroids such as prednisolone, budesonide MMX has demonstrated a robust safety profile, comparable to placebo in several randomised controlled trials1,2,3. There is however limited real-world evidence to substantiate this safety claim in clinical practice. The aim of this observational analysis is to evaluate the tolerability and ease of administration of budesonide MMX in the real-world setting using prednisolone as a benchmark. Methods Patients receiving treatment for mild to moderate UC were identified in 3 treatment centres between April and October 2019. After providing privacy and data consent, patients completed a detailed nurse-led questionnaire regarding their experiences with prednisolone treatment. Following 6 weeks of therapy with budesonide MMX, patients were sent a follow-up questionnaire. Data from both the initial and subsequent questionnaires were entered by the nurse into a database for assimilation and analysis. Results Twenty-eight patients completed initial and follow-up questionnaires. Of these, 78.6% (n = 22) had experienced ≥1 prednisolone-related side effects. In comparison, following treatment with budesonide MMX, 21.4% (n = 6) reported ≥1 side effects. Instances of these side effects are shown in Figure 1. 46.4% of patients (n = 13) reported the impact of prednisolone-related side effects on daily life as moderate or severe vs. 7.1% (n = 2) following treatment with budesonide MMX. By week 2 of treatment with budesonide MMX, rectal bleeding was resolved in 32.1% of patients (n = 9) and stool frequency in 35.7% (n = 10). 93.1% (n = 27) found the instructions to take budesonide MMX given by the health care professional very easy to understand and of those expressing a preference, 71.1% of patients (n = 19) would take budesonide MMX again if prescribed. Additional data will be presented. Conclusion Data from this ‘real-world’ observational study appear to support the safely profile of budesonide MMX reported in clinical trials. The incidence of patients who experienced &gt; 1 side-effect was nearly 4 times lower for budesonide vs. prednisolone. In addition, budesonide MMX therapy was acceptable to the majority of patients and accompanying instructions easy to understand. Additional data will be presented. References

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document