Palliative resection of the primary tumor in 442 metastasized neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a population-based, propensity score-matched survival analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 400 (6) ◽  
pp. 715-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix J. Hüttner ◽  
Lutz Schneider ◽  
Ignazio Tarantino ◽  
Rene Warschkow ◽  
Bruno M. Schmied ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Palliative Resection

The impact of palliative resection (PR) of the primary tumor on overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 509-509
Author(s):  
Gillian Gresham ◽  
Daniel John Renouf ◽  
Matthew Chan ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
The Impact

509 Background: The role of PR of the primary tumor in mCRC remains unclear. Using population-based data, we explored the impact of PR on OS. Methods: Patients (pts) with mCRC who were referred to 1 of 5 regional cancer centers in British Columbia between 2006 and 2008 were reviewed (n=802). Pts with prior early stage CRC who relapsed with mCRC were excluded (n=285). We conducted survival analysis using Kaplan Meier methods and determined adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for death using Cox proportional hazards models. A secondary propensity score matched analysis was performed to control for baseline differences between pts who underwent PR and those who did not. Results: A total of 517 pts with mCRC were identified: median age was 63 years (range 23-93), 54% were men, 55% had ECOG 0-1, 76% had a colon primary, and 31% had >1 metastatic site. The majority (n=378; 73%) underwent PR of the primary tumor and a significant proportion (n=327; 63%) received palliative chemotherapy (CT). Compared to pts without PR, those with PR were more likely to be men (62 vs 51%, p=0.03), aged <65 years (63 vs 52%, p=0.03), ECOG 0-1 (61 vs 38%, p<0.0001), and receive palliative CT (68 vs 50%, p=0.0004). PR was associated with improved median OS across groups (Table). The benefit of PR on prognosis persisted in multivariate analysis (HR for death 0.56, 95%CI 0.43-0.72, p<0.0001 for entire cohort; HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.37-0.70, p<0.0001 for individuals who were treated with CT; and HR 0.54, 95%CI 0.34-0.84, p=0.007 for those who did not receive CT). In a propensity score matched analysis that considered age, gender, ECOG, and receipt of palliative CT, prognosis continued to be more favorable in the PR group (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86, p=0.0019). Conclusions: In this population-based analysis, PR of the primary tumor in mCRC was associated with a significant OS benefit. [Table: see text]

The Role of Wireless Capsule Endoscopy (WCE) in the Detection of Occult Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-156
Author(s):  
Manuele Furnari ◽  
Andrea Buda ◽  
Gabriele Delconte ◽  
Davide Citterio ◽  
Theodor Voiosu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumor ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Wireless Capsule Endoscopy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Wireless Capsule

Background & Aims: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with unclear etiology that may show functioning or non-functioning features. Primary tumor localization often requires integrated imaging. The European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society (ENETS) guidelines proposed wireless-capsule endoscopy (WCE) as a possible diagnostic tool for NETs, if intestinal origin is suspected. However, its impact on therapeutic management is debated. We aimed to evaluate the yield of WCE in detecting intestinal primary tumor in patients showing liver NET metastases when first-line investigations are inconclusive.Method: Twenty-four patients with histological diagnosis of metastatic NET from liver biopsy and no evidence of primary lesions at first-line investigations were prospectively studied in an ENETS-certified tertiary care center. Wireless-capsule endoscopy was requested before explorative laparotomy and intra-operative ultrasound. The diagnostic yield of WCE was compared to the surgical exploration.Results: Sixteen subjects underwent surgery; 11/16 had positive WCE identifying 16 bulging lesions. Mini-laparotomy found 13 NETs in 11/16 patients (9 small bowel, 3 pancreas, 1 bile ducts). Agreement between WCE and laparotomy was recorded in 9 patients (Sensitivity=75%; Specificity=37.5%; PPV=55%; NPV=60%). Correspondence assessed per-lesions produced similar results (Sensitivity=70%; Specificity=25%; PPV=44%; NPV=50%). No capsule retentions were recorded.Conclusions: Wireless-capsule endoscopy is not indicated as second-line investigation for patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs. In the setting of a referral center, it might provide additional information when conventional investigations are inconclusive about the primary site.Abbreviations: DBE: double balloon enteroscopy; GEP-NET: gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; GI: gastrointestinal; ENETS: European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society; NET: neuroendocrine tumor; SSRS: somatostatin receptor scintigraphy; WCE: wireless capsule endoscopy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document