scholarly journals Evaluation of a Non-invasive Method to Detect Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-DNA in Stool Samples of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A Pilot Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans H. Herfarth ◽  
Millie D. Long ◽  
Tara C. Rubinas ◽  
Mikki Sandridge ◽  
Melissa B. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Invasive Method ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Stool Samples

scholarly journals Breath Analysis Using eNose and Ion Mobility Technology to Diagnose Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Pilot Study

Biosensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiele ◽  
Wicaksono ◽  
Kansara ◽  
Arasaradnam ◽  
Covington
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Ion Mobility ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Breath Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Exhaled Breath ◽  
Faecal Calprotectin ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Early diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), remains a clinical challenge with current tests being invasive and costly. The analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath and biomarkers in stool (faecal calprotectin (FCP)) show increasing potential as non-invasive diagnostic tools. The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the efficacy of breath analysis and determine if FCP can be used as an additional non-invasive parameter to supplement breath results, for the diagnosis of IBD. Thirty-nine subjects were recruited (14 CD, 16 UC, 9 controls). Breath samples were analysed using an in-house built electronic nose (Wolf eNose) and commercial gas chromatograph–ion mobility spectrometer (G.A.S. BreathSpec GC-IMS). Both technologies could consistently separate IBD and controls [AUC ± 95%, sensitivity, specificity], eNose: [0.81, 0.67, 0.89]; GC-IMS: [0.93, 0.87, 0.89]. Furthermore, we could separate CD from UC, eNose: [0.88, 0.71, 0.88]; GC-IMS: [0.71, 0.86, 0.62]. Including FCP did not improve distinction between CD vs UC; eNose: [0.74, 1.00, 0.56], but rather, improved separation of CD vs controls and UC vs controls; eNose: [0.77, 0.55, 1.00] and [0.72, 0.89, 0.67] without FCP, [0.81, 0.73, 0.78] and [0.90, 1.00, 0.78] with FCP, respectively. These results confirm the utility of breath analysis to distinguish between IBD-related diagnostic groups. FCP does not add significant diagnostic value to breath analysis within this study.

scholarly journals Predicting disease course in ulcerative colitis using stool proteins identified through an aptamer-based screen

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanam Soomro ◽  
Suresh Venkateswaran ◽  
Kamala Vanarsa ◽  
Marwa Kharboutli ◽  
Malavika Nidhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Disease Monitoring ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Lipocalin 2 ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Stool Samples

AbstractIn the search for improved stool biomarkers for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), an aptamer-based screen of 1129 stool proteins was conducted using stool samples from an IBD cohort. Here we report that of the 20 proteins subsequently validated by ELISA, stool Ferritin, Fibrinogen, Haptoglobin, Hemoglobin, Lipocalin-2, MMP-12, MMP-9, Myeloperoxidase, PGRP-S, Properdin, Resistin, Serpin A4, and TIMP-1 are significantly elevated in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) compared to controls. When tested in a longitudinal cohort of 50 UC patients at 4 time-points, fecal Fibrinogen, MMP-8, PGRP-S, and TIMP-2 show the strongest positive correlation with concurrent PUCAI and PGA scores and are superior to fecal calprotectin. Unlike fecal calprotectin, baseline stool Fibrinogen, MMP-12, PGRP-S, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 can predict clinical remission at Week-4. Here we show that stool proteins identified using the comprehensive aptamer-based screen are superior to fecal calprotectin alone in disease monitoring and prediction in IBD.

scholarly journals Utility of routinely collected electronic health records data to support effectiveness evaluations in inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study of tofacitinib

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. e100337
Author(s):  
Vivek Ashok Rudrapatna ◽  
Benjamin Scott Glicksberg ◽  
Atul Janardhan Butte
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
P Value ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

ObjectivesElectronic health records (EHR) are receiving growing attention from regulators, biopharmaceuticals and payors as a potential source of real-world evidence. However, their suitability for the study of diseases with complex activity measures is unclear. We sought to evaluate the use of EHR data for estimating treatment effectiveness in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), using tofacitinib as a use case.MethodsRecords from the University of California, San Francisco (6/2012 to 4/2019) were queried to identify tofacitinib-treated IBD patients. Disease activity variables at baseline and follow-up were manually abstracted according to a preregistered protocol. The proportion of patients meeting the endpoints of recent randomised trials in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) was assessed.Results86 patients initiated tofacitinib. Baseline characteristics of the real-world and trial cohorts were similar, except for universal failure of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the former. 54% (UC) and 62% (CD) of patients had complete capture of disease activity at baseline (month −6 to 0), while only 32% (UC) and 69% (CD) of patients had complete follow-up data (month 2 to 8). Using data imputation, we estimated the proportion achieving the trial primary endpoints as being similar to the published estimates for both UC (16%, p value=0.5) and CD (38%, p-value=0.8).Discussion/ConclusionThis pilot study reproduced trial-based estimates of tofacitinib efficacy despite its use in a different cohort but revealed substantial missingness in routinely collected data. Future work is needed to strengthen EHR data and enable real-world evidence in complex diseases like IBD.

scholarly journals Fecal Calprotectin in Combination With Standard Blood Tests in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaun S. C. Ho ◽  
Michael Ross ◽  
Jacqueline I. Keenan ◽  
Andrew S. Day
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Blood Tests ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Introduction: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a useful non-invasive screening test but elevated levels are not specific to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FC alone or FC in combination with other standard blood tests in the diagnosis of IBD.Methods: Children aged <17 years who had FC (normal range <50 μg/g) measured and underwent endoscopy over 33 months in Christchurch, New Zealand were identified retrospectively (consecutive sampling). Medical records were reviewed for patient final diagnoses.Results: One hundred and two children were included; mean age was 12.3 years and 53 were male. Fifty-eight (57%) of the 102 children were diagnosed with IBD: 49 with Crohn's disease, eight with ulcerative colitis and one with IBD-unclassified. FC of 50 μg/g threshold provided a sensitivity of 96.6% [95% confident interval (CI) 88.3–99.4%] and PPV of 72.7% (95% CI 61.9–81.4%) in diagnosing IBD. Two children with IBD however were found to have FC <50 μg/g. Sensitivity in diagnosing IBD was further improved to 98.3% (95% CI 90.7–99.1%) when including FC >50 μg/g or elevated platelet count. Furthermore, PPVs in diagnosing IBD improved when FC at various thresholds was combined with either low albumin or high platelet count.Conclusion: Although FC alone is a useful screening test for IBD, a normal FC alone does not exclude IBD. Extending FC to include albumin or platelet count may improve sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV in diagnosing IBD. However, prospective studies are required to validate this conclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document