Journal rankings and publication strategy

AbstractWe study the impact of journal ranking systems on publication outlet choice. We investigate the publication behavior of UK-based scholars registered on IDEAS/RePEc and analyze the publication outcomes of their academic work uploaded to the repository. Our estimates suggest that authors strategically choose outlets to maximize their publication scores. Our identification strategy is based on exploiting the change in the British ABS journal ranking in 2015. Working papers written before the 2015 ABS journal ranking change are significantly less likely to be published in ex-post downgraded journals. The effect cannot be attributed to the overall change in journal quality.

Download Full-text

Publication Anxiety, Quality, and Journal Rankings: Researcher Views

Australasian Journal of Information Systems ◽

10.3127/ajis.v20i0.1262 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 20 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Darryl Coulthard ◽

Susan Keller

Keyword(s):

Information Systems ◽

Empirical Studies ◽

Research Performance ◽

Journal Ranking ◽

Journal Rankings ◽

Ranking Systems ◽

Published Research

Journal ranking systems are increasingly used to measure research performance of academics and universities. A growing number of academic commentators have voiced concerns of possible undesirable outcomes such as increased publication anxiety and an increase in safe and conforming research, but there have been few empirical studies on the possible effects. To address this gap, we surveyed Information Systems (IS) academics who published in one of three key IS conferences in 2013, to gather their views of the effects of journal ranking systems. Overall, we found that the concerns in the literature were strongly reflected in the views of those surveyed. Academics believe the system has greatly increased their publication anxiety. While most believed that the quality of published research had improved, researchers believe the ranking systems inhibit innovative, risky research, and encourages safe, conforming, mainstream research.

Download Full-text

Survey Data Quality in Analyzing Harmonized Indicators of Protest Behavior: A Survey Data Recycling Approach

American Behavioral Scientist ◽

10.1177/00027642211021623 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 000276422110216

Author(s):

Kazimierz M. Slomczynski ◽

Irina Tomescu-Dubrow ◽

Ilona Wysmulek

Keyword(s):

Data Processing ◽

Data Quality ◽

Survey Data ◽

A Priori ◽

Data Sets ◽

New Approach ◽

Survey Quality ◽

Survey Error ◽

Ex Post ◽

The Impact

This article proposes a new approach to analyze protest participation measured in surveys of uneven quality. Because single international survey projects cover only a fraction of the world’s nations in specific periods, researchers increasingly turn to ex-post harmonization of different survey data sets not a priori designed as comparable. However, very few scholars systematically examine the impact of the survey data quality on substantive results. We argue that the variation in source data, especially deviations from standards of survey documentation, data processing, and computer files—proposed by methodologists of Total Survey Error, Survey Quality Monitoring, and Fitness for Intended Use—is important for analyzing protest behavior. In particular, we apply the Survey Data Recycling framework to investigate the extent to which indicators of attending demonstrations and signing petitions in 1,184 national survey projects are associated with measures of data quality, controlling for variability in the questionnaire items. We demonstrate that the null hypothesis of no impact of measures of survey quality on indicators of protest participation must be rejected. Measures of survey documentation, data processing, and computer records, taken together, explain over 5% of the intersurvey variance in the proportions of the populations attending demonstrations or signing petitions.

Download Full-text

The Demerger Impact upon Sustainable Development of Economic Entities: Evidence from Romania

Sustainability ◽

10.3390/su13158316 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (15) ◽

pp. 8316

Author(s):

Camelia Mirela Baba ◽

Constantin Duguleană ◽

Marius Sorin Dincă ◽

Liliana Duguleană ◽

Gheorghița Dincă

Keyword(s):

Sustainable Development ◽

Business Strategies ◽

The Sustainable Development ◽

Ex Post ◽

Before And After ◽

Almost All ◽

The Impact ◽

Profitability Ratios ◽

Positive Effect

The Covid-19 induced economic crisis has significantly affected almost all businesses from nearly every sector, causing severe financial problems, lack of cash assets, and decrease of revenues. In this context, the economic entities were forced to look for adjustment and rescue solutions of their activities. One possible solution for the recovery and reorganization of economic entities’ activities is demerger. This paper evaluates the impact of demerger upon the sustainable development of economic entities in terms of economic efficiency and financial performances. To achieve this goal, a statistical analysis of profitability ratios before and after the demerger, as well as a structural analysis of 268 demerger projects for the April 2012–April 2021 period, were performed. The results attest there are no significant differences between the ex-ante and ex-post financial performances. However, demerger seems to have a positive effect upon analyzed companies helping them to overcome economic hardships, rethink their business strategies, and continue their activity in the medium and long-term time horizon.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Submission Experiences on Perceptions of Journal Quality and Editorial Support: The Viewpoint of Chinese Authors

Journal of Scholarly Publishing ◽

10.3138/jsp.43.2.220 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 43 (2) ◽

pp. 220-229 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Zili Zhang ◽

Ziqiong Zhang ◽

Rob Law

Keyword(s):

Journal Quality ◽

The Impact

Download Full-text

Times of change in complex environments - Evaluating hospital co-payments in Palestine refugee camps

European Journal of Public Health ◽

10.1093/eurpub/ckaa166.1252 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽

Author(s):

S V Valente de Almeida ◽

H Ghattas ◽

G Paolucci ◽

A Seita

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Policy Change ◽

Negative Binomial ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Average Length ◽

Lessons Learned ◽

Policy Impact ◽

Average Length Of Stay ◽

Ex Post ◽

The Impact

Abstract We measure the impact introducing a of 10% co-payment component on hospitalisation costs for Palestine refugees from Lebanon in public and private hospitals. This ex-post analysis provides a detailed insight on the direction and magnitude of the policy impact in terms of demand and supply for healthcare. The data was collected by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East and include episode level information from all public, private and Red Crescent Hospitals in Lebanon, between April 2016 and October 2017. This is a complete population episode level dataset with information from before and after the policy change. We use multinomial logit, negative binomial and linear models to estimate the policy impact on demand by type of hospital, average length of stay and treatment costs for the patient and the provider. After the new policy was implemented patients were 18% more likely to choose a (free-of-charge) PRCS hospital for secondary care, instead of a Private or Public hospital, where the co-payment was introduced. This impact was stronger for episodes with longer stays, which are also the more severe and more expensive cases. Average length of stay decreased in general for all hospitals and we could not find a statistically significant impact on costs for the provider nor the patient. We find evidence that the introduction of co-payments is hospital costs led to a shift in demand, but it is not clear to what extent the hospitals receiving this demand shift were prepared for having more patients than before, also because these are typically of less quality then the others. Regarding costs, there is no evidence that the provider managed to contain costs with the new policy, as the demand adapted to the changes. Our findings provide important information on hospitalisation expenses and the consequences of a policy change from a lessons learned perspective that should be taken into account for future policy decision making. Key messages We show that in a context of poverty, the introduction of payment for specific hospital types can be efficient for shifting demand, but has doubtable impact on costs containment for the provider. The co-payment policy can have a negative impact on patients' health since after its implementation demand increased at free-of-charge hospitals, which typically have less resources to treat patients.

Download Full-text

Management Entrenchment, Firm Characteristics and Earnings Management Of Conglomerate Companies In Nigeria

JURNAL ADMINISTRASI BISNIS ◽

10.14710/jab.v9i1.28576 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 1-14

Author(s):

Temitope Olamide Fagbemi ◽

Olubunmi Florence Osemene ◽

Oyinlade Agbaje

Keyword(s):

Capital Structure ◽

Earnings Management ◽

Management Practices ◽

Discretionary Accruals ◽

P Value ◽

Secondary Source ◽

Firm Characteristics ◽

Ex Post ◽

Management Entrenchment ◽

The Impact

Sometimes the rivalry between shareholders and management is an indication of the level of entrenchment within the corporate environment. Managers are believed to routinely manipulate earnings in order to mislead shareholders about their company's actual economic outlook or performance. As a result, the study investigated the impact of managerial entrenchment, firm characteristics and earnings management of conglomerate companies in Nigeria. Employing the ex-post facto research design, the data was gathered from secondary source of the 6 listed conglomerate companies for the 11-year period running (2008-2018). The study used discretionary accruals a proxy for earnings management and to calculate discretionary accruals, the study used modified Jones model. The result showed that management entrenchment and firm characteristics have Impact on multinational firms ' earnings management in Nigeria. Specifically, from the conglomerate’s entrenchment proxies, CEO’s tenure has a positive and significant impact on earnings management (coff. =1.062821, p-value =0.0367) and management entrenchment as measured by CEO’s shareholding has a negative and insignificant effect on earnings management (coff. =-6252391, p-value = 0.4090) while firm size, profitability and leverage indicated a significant and positive impact on earnings management (coff, = 0.124587, p-value = 0.0000; coff. = 0.006647, p-value = 0.0431 and coff. = 0.032065, p-value = 0.0000). The study therefore recommended among others that management should reduce the debt in their capital structure in order to improve their companies’ value and their capital structure should be majorly financed by equity rather than debt and reduce CEOs tenure to minimise earnings management practices.

Download Full-text

Which journal ranking list? A case study in business and economics

EuroMed Journal of Business ◽

10.1108/emjb-05-2020-0039 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽

Author(s):

Rayana Jaafar ◽

Vijay Pereira ◽

Samer S. Saab ◽

Abdul-Nasser El-Kassar

Keyword(s):

Research Output ◽

Citation Count ◽

Google Scholar ◽

Journal Ranking ◽

Content Type ◽

Journal Quality ◽

Hard Time ◽

Yearly Average ◽

The University

PurposeWith over 3,000 academic journals in the fields of Business and Economics, most academics face a hard time selecting an adequate journal to submit their work to. In today's demanding academic environment and with the presence of different journal ranking lists (JRLs), the selection becomes more difficult when considering employment, promotion and funding. The purpose of this paper is to explore key differences among multiple JRLs pertinent to the latter common objectives. An extensive analysis is conducted to compare the content of journals in the Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality list, Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) in the fields of Business and Economics. Then, a case of a university with medium research output is considered where scholarly performance evaluation is based on the ABDC Journal Quality List.Design/methodology/approachAfter ranking journals in the fields of Business and Economics based on SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) indicator, JCR's Journal Impact Factor (JIF) and JCR's Eigenfactor (EF), a methodology is proposed to categorize journals in the three JRLs into the same categorization adopted by ABDC. The latter establishes a way to compare the four JRLs under consideration and serves as a basis to compare and analyze the content of journals in the ABDC Journal Quality list, Scopus and WoS. As a proxy impact metric, a normalized citation count is associated with each article based on Google Scholar. The publications of the considered university are then evaluated from the perspective of the four JRLs in terms of citation-based impact and quality while considering the exposure to popular world university ranking tables.FindingsFor journals classified under fourth tier by ABDC, over 53 and 59% are not indexed by Scopus and WoS, respectively. In this case study, over 42% of the publications appear in journals that are not listed in JCR despite the fact that over 94% of them are listed by the SJR list. Generally, publications that appear in journals listed by JCR achieve, on a yearly average, significantly higher citation rates when compared to those that appear in journals listed in ABDC and SJR Lists.Originality/valueA four-tier mapping is proposed for consistent comparison among JRLs. Normalized citation count associated with each article based on Google Scholar is employed for evaluation. The findings provide recommendations for scholars, administrators and global universities, including Euro-Med Universities, on which JRL can be more influential for both faculty development and positioning of the university.

Download Full-text

Evaluating the efficacy of technical measures: a case study of selection device legislation in the UK Crangon crangon (brown shrimp) fishery

ICES Journal of Marine Science ◽

10.1093/icesjms/fsn016 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 65 (2) ◽

pp. 267-275 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Tom L. Catchpole ◽

Andrew S. Revill ◽

James Innes ◽

Sean Pascoe

Keyword(s):

Brown Shrimp ◽

Crangon Crangon ◽

Shrimp Fishery ◽

The North ◽

Ex Post ◽

Wide Range ◽

The Uk ◽

The Impact ◽

Technical Measures

Abstract Catchpole, T. L., Revill, A. S., Innes, J., and Pascoe, S. 2008. Evaluating the efficacy of technical measures: a case study of selection device legislation in the UK Crangon crangon (brown shrimp) fishery. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65: 267–275. Bycatch reduction devices are being introduced into a wide range of fisheries, with shrimp and prawn fisheries particularly targeted owing to the heavy discarding common in these fisheries. Although studies are often undertaken to estimate the impact of a technical measure on the fishery before implementation, rarely have the impacts been assessed ex post. Here, the efficacy of the UK legislation pertaining to the use of sievenets in the North Sea Crangon crangon fishery is assessed. Three impacts were evaluated: on fisher behaviour (social), on the level of bycatch (biological), and on vessel profitability (economic). An apparent high level of compliance by skippers was identified despite a low level of enforcement. The estimated reduction in fleet productivity following the introduction of the legislation was 14%, equalling the mean loss of Crangon landings when using sievenets calculated from catch comparison trawls. Sievenets did reduce the unnecessary capture of unwanted marine organisms, but were least effective at reducing 0-group plaice, which make up the largest component of the bycatch. Clearly the legislation has had an effect in the desired direction, but it does not address sufficiently the bycatch issue in the Crangon fishery.

Download Full-text