Effect of orlistat on weight loss, hormonal and metabolic profiles in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Endocrine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 286-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf Moini ◽  
Mahia Kanani ◽  
Ladan Kashani ◽  
Reihaneh Hosseini ◽  
Ladan Hosseini
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e024065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Gudbergsen ◽  
Marius Henriksen ◽  
Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens ◽  
Anders Overgaard ◽  
Henning Bliddal ◽  
...  

IntroductionWith an increasing prevalence of citizens of older age and with overweight, the health issues related to knee osteoarthritis (OA) will intensify. Weight loss is considered a primary management strategy in patients with concomitant overweight and knee OA. However, there are no widely available and feasible methods to sustain weight loss in patients with overweight and knee OA. The present protocol describes a randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide in a 3 mg/day dosing in patients with overweight and knee OA.Methods and analysis150 volunteer adult patients with overweight or obesity and knee OA will participate in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group and single-centre trial. The participants will partake in a run-in diet intervention phase (week −8 to 0) including a low calorie diet and dietetic counselling. At week 0, patients will be randomised to either liraglutide 3 mg/day or liraglutide placebo 3 mg/day for 52 weeks as an add-on to dietetic guidance on re-introducing regular foods and a focus on continued motivation to engage in a healthy lifestyle. The co-primary outcomes are changes in body weight and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale from week 0 to week 52.Ethics and disseminationThe trial has been approved by the regional ethics committee in the Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Data Protection Agency. An external monitoring committee (The Good Clinical Practice Unit at Copenhagen University Hospitals) will oversee the trial. The results will be presented at international scientific meetings and through publications in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numbers2015-005163-16,NCT02905864, U1111-1171-4970Based on protocol versionV.6; 30 January 2017, 15:30 hours


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1638-1638
Author(s):  
Erin Glynn ◽  
Stephen Fleming ◽  
Heather Leidy ◽  
Michael Wilson

Abstract Objectives To determine if greater weight loss and improvement in metabolic outcomes could be achieved with twice daily consumption of a proprietary supplement shake containing high protein and fiber (HPF) as compared to an isocaloric low protein, lower fiber placebo (P). Methods In an independently conducted randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial, healthy overweight and obese adults (n = 206, BMI 27–35 kg/m2, 70% Female) were equally assigned to HPF or P. All participants were instructed to follow a 500-calorie deficit diet from estimated daily energy requirements using a dietary exchange program and were asked to consume HPF or P 30 min before breakfast and lunch for 12 weeks. The supplement was a commercially available product composed of protein, fruit, vegetable, and plant powders, as well as vitamins, minerals, pre-, and probiotics. Body weight, body composition, and blood samples were collected at days (D) 0 and 84. Statistics were conducted by ANCOVA or repeated measure ANCOVA modeling using sex and baseline values as covariates, with time and treatment as within- and between-subject variables, respectively. Per protocol analyses were included for the 133 adults who completed the study. Results Weight loss occurred throughout the study in both groups. HPF had greater weight loss at D 84 vs P (–4.0% vs −2.2% body weight, respectively; P < 0.05). Total cholesterol, LDL, and oxidized LDL decreased to a greater extent following HPF at D 84 (P < 0.05 vs D 0 and vs P), with no change in HDL cholesterol. The increase in serum adiponectin from D 0 to D 84 was greater in HPF vs P (P < 0.05) with no change in leptin. Percent body fat tended to decrease throughout the study in both groups (HPF: −1.44%, P: −1.27%; P = 0.056) with no differences between groups. There were no clinically relevant changes in assessed safety outcomes in either group. Conclusions A HPF supplement taken as a preload before breakfast and lunch improved weight loss and metabolic outcomes such as total, LDL and oxidized LDL cholesterol compared to a calorie-matched placebo. This study suggests nutrient factors other than calorie reduction alone influence the success of a weight loss regimen, potentially including nutrient density, protein and fiber content. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03057873. Funding Sources This study was funded by Beachbody, LLC.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA6008-LBA6008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schlumberger ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Bruce Robinson ◽  
Marcia S. Brose ◽  
...  

LBA6008 Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, PDGFRβ, RET, and KIT signaling networks. Based on efficacy results of the phase 2 study of patients (pts) with 131I-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), this phase 3 Study of (E7080) Lenvatinib in Differentiated Cancer of the Thyroid (SELECT) was developed. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study enrolled pts with RR-DTC with documented disease progression within 13 months (mo). Pts were stratified by age (≤65, >65 years), region and ≤1 prior VEGFR-targeted therapies and randomized 2:1 to LEN or PBO (24mg/d, 28-d cycle). Upon progression, pts receiving PBO could crossover to open-label LEN. The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by Independent Radiologic Review; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + PR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 392 pts (63.0 years median age; 51.0% male) were randomized. Pts on LEN had a significantly prolonged PFS vs PBO (hazard ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.31; P <.0001); median PFS was LEN: 18.3 mo (95% CI 15.1–not evaluable), PBO: 3.6 mo (95% CI 2.2–3.7). A LEN PFS benefit was observed in all predefined subgroups; median LEN PFS for pts with prior vs no prior VEGF-therapy was 15.1 mo (n=66) and 18.7 mo (n=195), respectively. Rates (n) of CRs were LEN: 1.5% (4), PBO: 0; PRs were LEN: 63.2% (165), PBO: 1.5% (2).Median exposure duration was LEN: 13.8 mo, PBO: 3.9 mo; median time to LEN response was 2.0 mo. Median OS has not been reached; deaths per arm were LEN: 71 (27.2%), PBO: 47 (35.9%). The 5 most common LEN treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; any grade) were hypertension (68%), diarrhea (59%), appetite decreased (50%), weight loss (46%), nausea (41%). LEN grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥5%) were hypertension (42%), proteinuria (10%), weight loss (10%), diarrhea (8%), appetite decreased (5%). The dose was reduced in 78.5% of pts and discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) in 14.2% of pts. Conclusions: LEN significantly improved PFS compared with PBO in pts with progressive RR-DTC. There were no unexpected toxicities and AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT01321554.


2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 117-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Taghizadeh ◽  
Mohammad Reza Memarzadeh ◽  
Zatollah Asemi ◽  
Ahmad Esmaillzadeh

Background: The current study was performed to determine the effects of cumin cyminum L. intake on weight loss and metabolic profiles among overweight subjects. Methods: This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted among 78 overweight subjects (male, n = 18; female, n = 60) aged 18-60 years old. Participants were randomly assigned into three groups to receive: (1) cumin cyminum L. capsule (n = 26); (2) orlistat120 capsule (n = 26) and (3) placebo (n = 26) three times a day for 8 weeks. Anthropometric measures and fasting blood samples were taken at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. Results: Consumption of the Cuminum cyminum L. and orlistat120 resulted in a similar significant decrease in weight (-1.1 ± 1.2 and -0.9 ± 1.5 vs. 0.2 ± 1.5 kg, respectively, p = 0.002) and BMI (-0.4 ± 0.5 and -0.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.1 ± 0.6 kg/m2, respectively, p = 0.003) compared with placebo. In addition, taking Cuminum cyminum L., compared with orlistat and placebo, led to a significant reduction in serum insulin levels (-1.4 ± 4.5 vs. 1.3 ± 3.3 and 0.3 ± 2.2 µIU/ml, respectively, p = 0.02), HOMA-B (-5.4 ± 18.9 vs. 5.8 ± 13.3 and 1.0 ± 11.0, respectively, p = 0.02) and a significant rise in QUICKI (0.01 ± 0.01 vs. -0.005 ± 0.01 and -0.004 ± 0.01, respectively, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Taking cumin cyminum L. for eight weeks among overweight subjects had the same effects of orlistat120 on weight and BMI and beneficial effects on insulin metabolism compared with orlistat120 and placebo.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document