scholarly journals SEOM clinical guideline in ovarian cancer (2020)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Redondo ◽  
E. Guerra ◽  
L. Manso ◽  
C. Martin-Lorente ◽  
J. Martinez-Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Guideline ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
History Of

AbstractDespite remarkable advances in the knowledge of molecular biology and treatment, ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer. In the last decade, there have been important advances both in systemic and surgical treatment. However, there is no doubt that the incorporation of PARP inhibitors as maintenance after the response to platinum-based chemotherapy, first in recurrent disease and recently also in first line, will change the natural history of the disease.The objective of this guide is to summarize the current evidence for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of ovarian cancer, and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-Up of a Female Patient Treated with Olaparib—Hope for a Long Life without Relapse?

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 3430
Author(s):  
Mateusz Kozłowski ◽  
Katarzyna Nowak ◽  
Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Brca1 Gene ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Reproductive Organs ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
History Of ◽  
Advanced Stages

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common cancers of the reproductive organs. As there are no symptoms in the early stages, it is mainly detected in the advanced stages. Even then, the symptoms are non-specific and include, for example, abdominal pain, early satiety, or changes in bowel habits. Both biochemical marker levels and imaging studies are used in the initial diagnosis. However, it should be emphasized that they are not characterized by high specificity. Treatment is multistage, and usually first-line debulking surgery is used followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Here we present a clinical case of a 56-year-old female, a carrier of a mutation in the BRCA1 gene, with a history of breast cancer and with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. The patient was qualified for treatment with a PARP inhibitor and is currently undergoing treatment with olaparib. In the patient’s follow up of 50 months to date, there has been no recurrence of cancer. Few side effects have been observed, and the most serious one that can be effectively treated is anemia. On the basis of the described case, the authors concluded that olaparib treatment is effective, relatively safe, and does not significantly affect daily functioning.

Uptake of targeted therapy in clinical practice among US patients with ovarian cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18049-e18049
Author(s):  
John K. Chan ◽  
Larissa Meyer ◽  
Patricia Luhn ◽  
Carlos Flores ◽  
Lydie Bastiere-Truchot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Treatment Data ◽  
History Of ◽  
Combination Studies

e18049 Background: Since first approvals for targeted therapies (TTs) in ovarian cancer (OC) patients (pts) in 2014, FDA approvals for TTs including bevacizumab (bev) and PARP inhibitors (PARPis) continue to expand. Approval of front line (1L) indications for bevacizumab (all-comers) and maintenance olaparib (BRCA-mutated) occurred in 2018. Here we describe real-world trends in the use of these TTs. Methods: Data were analyzed from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database of patient-level data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction. We used descriptive statistics and significance tests to describe TT use in pts with OC. Results: We included 2975 treated OC pts diagnosed from 2011-18, with treatment data through 2019. Median follow-up was 32 months. 47% of OC pts received TT during follow-up, 12% of whom received TT during 1L. TTs were given as maintenance therapy in 54% of 1L and 37% of recurrent (2L+) OC pts. 40% of OC pts received bevacizumab anytime, 24% of whom received bevacizumab during 1L. Bevacizumab was given as maintenance therapy in 43% of 1L and 26% of recurrent OC pts. 20% of 2L and 17% of 3L bevacizumab-treated pts were platinum sensitive. From 2012-19, bevacizumab use changed biennially from 10% to 10% to 8% to 18% in FL (p < 0.001), 24% to 35% to 34% to 38% in 2L (p = 0.008), and 21% to 34% to 35% to 36% in 3L (p = 0.06). Corresponding changes in PARPis use were 0% to 0% to 5% to 13% in FL (p = 0.03), 0% to 1% to 11% to 23% in 2L (p = 0.09), and 0% to 3% to 10% to 20% in 3L (p = 0.02). TT use (ever vs. never during follow-up) was more common among pts with stage III-IV tumors (81% vs. 55%), serous histology (90% vs. 75%), history of BRCA (82% vs. 61%) or NGS (38% vs. 13%) testing, and BRCA mutations (21% vs. 33%) (p < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: Bevacizumab and PARPi use is expanding in 1L and 2L treatment; in 1L bevacizumab was more common than PARPis in 2019 (31% vs. 19%). These data reflect the evolving treatment landscape in 1L OC, which is expected to further evolve based on recent evidence from maintenance PARPi monotherapy and PARPi + bevacizumab combination studies. [Table: see text]

Getting the MOST out of follow-up: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 monthly nurse led follow-up via telehealth, including monitoring CA125 and patient reported outcomes using the MOST (Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment concerns) with routine clinic based or telehealth follow-up, after completion of first line chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-002999
Author(s):  
Paul A Cohen ◽  
Penelope M Webb ◽  
Madeleine King ◽  
Andreas Obermair ◽  
Val Gebski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Emotional Wellbeing ◽  
First Line ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Serum Ca125 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundPhysical symptoms, anxiety, depression, fear of recurrence, sexual dysfunction, and social withdrawal are common in women after treatment for ovarian cancer. Most patients would like and need help dealing with these symptoms. The traditional model of follow-up care is unstructured and largely focused on diagnosing recurrent disease, and most oncologists lack skills to identify and manage psychosocial issues. No high quality prospective clinical trials have been conducted to determine the optimal follow-up regimen or the cost effectiveness of ovarian cancer surveillance strategies.Primary Objective(s)To assess emotional wellbeing, acceptability, safety, and cost effectiveness of nurse led follow-up via telehealth for women with ovarian cancer following completion of primary treatment.Study HypothesisWe hypothesize that compared with routine clinic based follow-up, nurse led follow-up via telehealth, including serum CA125 monitoring and completion of a patient reported outcome instrument, the Measure of Ovarian Symptoms and Treatment concerns-Surveillance (MOST-S26), will improve emotional wellbeing in women with ovarian cancer; be feasible, safe, acceptable, and not delay the time to diagnosis of recurrent disease; will result in greater patient satisfaction; will identify more patients with psychological distress, lead to better care, and improved psychological outcomes; and be cost-effective.Trial DesignPhase II multicenter randomized trial comparing 3 monthly nurse led telehealth consultations that include serum CA125 monitoring and completion of the MOST-S26, with routine clinic based follow-up. The allocation ratio will be 1:1.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaEligible patients will be women with high grade epithelial ovarian cancer who have normalized serum CA125 (to <35 kU/L) at completion of first line chemotherapy.Primary Endpoint(s)Emotional wellbeing at 12 months.Sample Size150 patients.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsJuly 2023. Results expected in 2025, 24 months after the last participant is enrolled.Trial RegistrationACTRN12620000332921

Use of First-Line PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Ursula Hasler-Strub
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Front Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens are the mainstay of advanced ovarian cancer treatment. However, up to 85% of the patients experience recurrence under these settings. To fill this gap, novel front-line treatment strategies have been established, leading to unprecedented clinical benefits. For example, first-line bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic agent, plus chemotherapy followed by bevacizumab maintenance, has emerged as a new standard of care for newly diagnosed high risk ovarian cancer patients. This was based on the results of the phase III GOG 0218 and ICON-7 trials. More recently, poly(ADP)-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, including niraparib, olaparib and veliparib, have offered a new treatment option as part of the front-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Here we provide an overview of three recent studies that may lead to a paradigm shift in the first-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals NCCN Guidelines Insights: Ovarian Cancer, Version 1.2019

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 896-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah K. Armstrong ◽  
Ronald D. Alvarez ◽  
Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez ◽  
Lisa Barroilhet ◽  
Kian Behbakht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
The United States ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States, with less than half of patients living >5 years from diagnosis. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. The best outcomes are observed in patients whose primary treatment includes complete resection of all visible disease plus combination platinum-based chemotherapy. Research efforts are focused on primary neoadjuvant treatments that may improve resectability, as well as systemic therapies providing improved long-term survival. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy recommendations, including the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and the role of PARP inhibitors and bevacizumab as maintenance therapy options in select patients who have completed primary chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 501
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Chie Sato ◽  
Hidetoshi Tomabechi ◽  
Eriko Takatori ◽  
Yoshitaka Kaido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Targeted Drugs ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.

scholarly journals Under-Treatment of Older Patients with Newly Diagnosed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Remains an Issue

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 952
Author(s):  
Lucy Dumas ◽  
Rebecca Bowen ◽  
John Butler ◽  
Susana Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Older Women ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
First Line ◽  
Care Treatment ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Standard Of Care Treatment

Older women with ovarian cancer have disproportionately poorer survival outcomes than their younger counterparts and receive less treatment. In order to understand where the gaps lie in the treatment of older patients, studies incorporating more detailed assessment of baseline characteristics and treatment delivery beyond the scope of most cancer registries are required. We aimed to assess the proportion of women over the age of 65 who are offered and receive standard of care for first-line ovarian cancer at two UK NHS Cancer Centres over a 5-year period (December 2009 to August 2015). Standard of care treatment was defined as a combination of cytoreductive surgery and if indicated platinum-based chemotherapy (combination or single-agent). Sixty-five percent of patients aged 65 and above received standard of care treatment. Increasing age was associated with lower rates of receiving standard of care (35% > 80 years old versus 78% of 65–69-year-olds, p = 0.000). Older women were less likely to complete the planned chemotherapy course (p = 0.034). The oldest women continue to receive lower rates of standard care compared to younger women. Once adjusted for Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and first-line treatment received, age was no longer an independent risk factor for poorer overall survival. Optimisation of vulnerable patients utilising a comprehensive geriatric assessment and directed interventions to facilitate the delivery of standard of care treatment could help narrow the survival discrepancy between the oldest patients and their younger counterparts.

scholarly journals Predictors of virological failure among people living with HIV receiving first line antiretroviral treatment in Myanmar: retrospective cohort analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Mesic ◽  
Alexander Spina ◽  
Htay Thet Mar ◽  
Phone Thit ◽  
Tom Decroo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Virological Failure ◽  
Antiretroviral Treatment ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hiv Viral Load ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
History Of ◽  
Living With Hiv

Abstract Background Progress toward the global target for 95% virological suppression among those on antiretroviral treatment (ART) is still suboptimal. We describe the viral load (VL) cascade, the incidence of virological failure and associated risk factors among people living with HIV receiving first-line ART in an HIV cohort in Myanmar treated by the Médecins Sans Frontières in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Sports Myanmar. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including adult patients with at least one HIV viral load test result and having received of at least 6 months’ standard first-line ART. The incidence rate of virological failure (HIV viral load ≥ 1000 copies/mL) was calculated. Multivariable Cox’s regression was performed to identify risk factors for virological failure. Results We included 25,260 patients with a median age of 33.1 years (interquartile range, IQR 28.0–39.1) and a median observation time of 5.4 years (IQR 3.7–7.9). Virological failure was documented in 3,579 (14.2%) participants, resulting in an overall incidence rate for failure of 2.5 per 100 person-years of follow-up. Among those who had a follow-up viral load result, 1,258 (57.1%) had confirmed virological failure, of which 836 (66.5%) were switched to second-line treatment. An increased hazard for failure was associated with age ≤ 19 years (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 1.51; 95% confidence intervals, CI 1.20–1.89; p < 0.001), baseline tuberculosis (aHR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14–1.49; p < 0.001), a history of low-level viremia (aHR 1.60; 95% CI 1.42–1.81; p < 0.001), or a history of loss-to-follow-up (aHR 1.24; 95% CI 1.41–1.52; p = 0.041) and being on the same regimen (aHR 1.37; 95% CI 1.07–1.76; p < 0.001). Cumulative appointment delay was not significantly associated with failure after controlling for covariates. Conclusions VL monitoring is an important tool to improve programme outcomes, however limited coverage of VL testing and acting on test results hampers its full potential. In our cohort children and adolescents, PLHIV with history of loss-to-follow-up or those with low-viremia are at the highest risk of virological failure and might require more frequent virological monitoring than is currently recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document