scholarly journals Karzinogenese: Big Bang oder kontinuierliche Evolution?

BIOspektrum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 718-720
Author(s):  
Kerstin Haase ◽  
Roland F. Schwarz

AbstractIntra-tumour heterogeneity is a key characteristic of tumours and poses significant clinical challenges. Despite extensive research, the evolutionary processes shaping cancer genomes are not yet fully understood. We here discuss two conflicting theories about the evolution of solid tumours: the Big Bang model and the classical model of continuous evolution. Using chromosomal instability we shed light on the preferred mode of cancer evolution and its implications for personalised treatment.

Universe ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 276
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zahid Mughal ◽  
Iftikhar Ahmad ◽  
Juan Luis García Guirao

In this review article, the study of the development of relativistic cosmology and the introduction of inflation in it as an exponentially expanding early phase of the universe is carried out. We study the properties of the standard cosmological model developed in the framework of relativistic cosmology and the geometric structure of spacetime connected coherently with it. The geometric properties of space and spacetime ingrained into the standard model of cosmology are investigated in addition. The big bang model of the beginning of the universe is based on the standard model which succumbed to failure in explaining the flatness and the large-scale homogeneity of the universe as demonstrated by observational evidence. These cosmological problems were resolved by introducing a brief acceleratedly expanding phase in the very early universe known as inflation. The cosmic inflation by setting the initial conditions of the standard big bang model resolves these problems of the theory. We discuss how the inflationary paradigm solves these problems by proposing the fast expansion period in the early universe. Further inflation and dark energy in fR modified gravity are also reviewed.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. SCI-37-SCI-37
Author(s):  
Christina Curtis

Abstract Cancer results from the acquisition of somatic alterations in an evolutionary process that typically occurs over many years, much of which is occult. Understanding the evolutionary dynamics that are operative at different stages of progression in individual tumors might inform the earlier detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. For decades, tumor progression has been described as a gradual stepwise process, and it is through this lens that the underlying mechanisms have been interpreted and therapeutic strategies have been developed. Although these processes cannot be directly observed, the resultant spatiotemporal patterns of genetic variation amongst tumor cells encode their evolutionary histories. Cancer genome sequencing has thus yielded unprecedented insights into intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) and these data enable the inference of tumor dynamics using population genetics techniques. The application of such approaches suggests that tumor evolution is not necessarily gradual, but rather can be punctuated, resulting in revision of the de facto sequential clonal expansion model. For example, we previously described a Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth, wherein after transformation the neoplasm grows predominantly as a single terminal expansion in the absence of stringent selection, compatible with effectively neutral evolution1. In the Big Bang model, the timing of a mutation is the fundamental determinant of its frequency in the final tumor such that all major clones persist during growth and most detectable intra-tumor heterogeneity (ITH) occurs early. By analyzing multi-region and single gland genomic profiles in colorectal adenomas and carcinomas within a spatial agent-based tumor growth model and Bayesian statistical inference framework, we demonstrated the early origin of ITH and verified several other predictions of the Big Bang model. This new model provides a quantitative framework for understanding tumor progression with several clinical implications. In particular, rare but potentially aggressive subclones may be undetectable, providing a rich substrate for the emergence of resistance under treatment selective pressure. These data also suggest that some tumors may be born to be bad, wherein malignant potential is specified early. While not all tumors exhibit Big Bang dynamics, effectively neutral evolution has since been reported in other tumors and hence may be relatively common. These findings emphasize the need for methods to infer the role of selection in established human tumors and the systematic evaluation of distinct modes of evolution across tumor types and disease stages. To address this need, we developed an extensible population genetics framework to simulate spatial tumor growth and evaluate evidence for different evolutionary modes based on patterns of genetic variation derived from multi-region sequencing (MRS) data2. We demonstrate that while it is feasible to distinguish strong positive selection from neutral tumor evolution, weak selection and neutral evolution were indistinguishable in current data. Building on these findings, we developed a classifier that exploits novel measures of ITH and applied this to MRS data from diverse tumor types, revealing different evolutionary modes amongst treatment naïve tumors. To better understand evolutionary tempos during disease progression, we further characterized longitudinally sampled specimens. These findings have implications for forecasting tumor evolution and designing more effective treatment strategies. 1. Sottoriva A, Kang H, Ma Z, et al. A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth. Nature Genetics. 2015;47:209-16. 2. Sun R, Hu Z, Sottoriva A, et al. Between-region genetic divergence reflects the mode and tempo of tumor evolution. Nature Genetics. 2017;49:1015-24. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Helge Kragh

The presently accepted big-bang model of the universe emerged during the period 1930-1970, following a road that was anything but smooth. By 1950 the essential features of the big-bang theory were established by George Gamow and his collaborators, and yet the theory failed to win recognition. A major reason was that the big-bang picture of the evolving universe was challenged by the radically different picture of a steady-state universe favoured by Fred Hoyle and others. By the late 1950s there was no convincing reason to adopt one theory over the other. Out of the epic controversy between the two incompatible world models arose our modern view of the universe. Although the classical steady-state model was abandoned in the mid-1960s, attempts to modify it can be followed up to the present.


2021 ◽  
Vol 502 (2) ◽  
pp. 2474-2481
Author(s):  
Cyril Pitrou ◽  
Alain Coc ◽  
Jean-Philippe Uzan ◽  
Elisabeth Vangioni

ABSTRACT Recent measurements of the D(p,γ)3He nuclear reaction cross-section and of the neutron lifetime, along with the reevaluation of the cosmological baryon abundance from cosmic microwave background (CMB) analysis, call for an update of abundance predictions for light elements produced during the big-bang nucleosynthesis (BBN). While considered as a pillar of the hot big-bang model in its early days, BBN constraining power mostly rests on deuterium abundance. We point out a new ≃1.8σ tension on the baryonic density, or equivalently on the D/H abundance, between the value inferred on one hand from the analysis of the primordial abundances of light elements and, on the other hand, from the combination of CMB and baryonic oscillation data. This draws the attention on this sector of the theory and gives us the opportunity to reevaluate the status of BBN in the context of precision cosmology. Finally, this paper presents an upgrade of the BBN code primat.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 49-52
Author(s):  
Ranjit Prasad Yadav

General relativity was developed by Albert Einstein near about 100 Years ago. This article attempt to give an outline about the brief history of general theory of relativity and to understand the background to the theory we have to look at how theories of gravitation developed. Before the advent of GR, Newton's law of gravitation had been accepted for more than two hundred years as a valid description of the gravitational force between masses i.e. gravity was the result of an attractive force between massive objects. General relativity has developed in to an essential tool in modern astrophysics. It provides the foundation for the understanding of black holes, regions of space where gravitational attraction is strong that not even light can escape and also a part of the big bang model of cosmology.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/av.v4i0.12358Academic Voices Vol.4 2014: 49-52


2018 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 02007
Author(s):  
A. Inoue ◽  
A. Tamii ◽  
K. Abe ◽  
S. Adachi ◽  
N. Aoi ◽  
...  

Our research goal is to measure the 7Be(d, p) reaction to shed light on the 7Li problem in the Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis. We are developing an unstable 7Be target for a high-resolution measurement of the 7Be(d, p)8Be reaction. We plan to compare two methods to producethe 7Be target: (1) Activation method, and (2) Implantation method. We performed an activation methodexperiment at the Van de Graaff at Osaka University, and obtained the cross-section data. A second experiment to obtain more accurate data will take place at the Tandem Electrostatic Accelerator, Kobe University. We have also made a 7Be target with implantation method at CRIB, Center for Nuclear Study, Univer-sity of Tokyo. An experiment to measure the (d, p) reaction with the implanted target is scheduled for 2018 at Japan Atomic Energy Agency, tandem facility.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (32) ◽  
pp. 1450169 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Vakili ◽  
K. Nozari ◽  
V. Hosseinzadeh ◽  
M. A. Gorji

We study a cosmological setup consisting of a FRW metric as the background geometry with a massless scalar field in the framework of classical polymerization of a given dynamical system. To do this, we first introduce the polymeric representation of the quantum operators. We then extend the corresponding process to reach a transformation which maps any classical variable to its polymeric counterpart. It is shown that such a formalism has also an analogue in terms of the symplectic structure, i.e. instead of applying polymerization to the classical Hamiltonian to arrive its polymeric form, one can use a new set of variables in terms of which Hamiltonian retains its form but now the corresponding symplectic structure gets a new deformed functional form. We show that these two methods are equivalent and by applying them to the scalar field FRW cosmology see that the resulting scale factor exhibits a bouncing behavior from a contraction phase to an expanding era. Since the replacing of the big bang singularity by a bouncing behavior is one of the most important predictions of the quantum cosmological theories, we may claim that our polymerized classical model brings with itself some signals from quantum theory.


1986 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 887-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.Z. FANG ◽  
Z.C. WU

Hawking’s theory of quantum cosmology is the most important stage in understanding our universe since the big bang model. In principle, one can predict everything in the universe solely from physical laws. All main results within this framework have been reviewed in this paper.


Think ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (57) ◽  
pp. 153-165
Author(s):  
Phillip Halper

ABSTRACTIn the late 1970s the big bang model of cosmology was widely accepted and interpreted as implying the universe had a beginning. At the end of that decade William Lane Craig revived an argument for God known as the Kalam Cosmological Argument (KCA) based on this scientific consensus. Furthermore, he linked the big bang to the supposed biblical concept of creation ex nihilo found in Genesis. I shall critique Craig's position as expressed in a more recent update and argue that contemporary cosmology no longer understands the big bang as the ultimate beginning, seriously undermining the KCA. I will further contend that book of Genesis should not be understood as describing creation ex nihilo anyway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document