A comparative study of support vector machine and logistic model tree classifiers for shallow landslide susceptibility modeling

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mousa Abedini ◽  
Bahareh Ghasemian ◽  
Ataollah Shirzadi ◽  
Dieu Tien Bui
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Landslide Susceptibility ◽  
Logistic Model ◽  
Shallow Landslide ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Susceptibility Modeling ◽  
Model Tree ◽  
Logistic Model Tree

scholarly journals Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 2749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet-Ha Nhu ◽  
Ataollah Shirzadi ◽  
Himan Shahabi ◽  
Sushant K. Singh ◽  
Nadhir Al-Ansari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Landslide Susceptibility ◽  
Logistic Model ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Shallow Landslide ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Model Tree ◽  
Logistic Model Tree

Shallow landslides damage buildings and other infrastructure, disrupt agriculture practices, and can cause social upheaval and loss of life. As a result, many scientists study the phenomenon, and some of them have focused on producing landslide susceptibility maps that can be used by land-use managers to reduce injury and damage. This paper contributes to this effort by comparing the power and effectiveness of five machine learning, benchmark algorithms—Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine—in creating a reliable shallow landslide susceptibility map for Bijar City in Kurdistan province, Iran. Twenty conditioning factors were applied to 111 shallow landslides and tested using the One-R attribute evaluation (ORAE) technique for modeling and validation processes. The performance of the models was assessed by statistical-based indexes including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the receiver operatic characteristic curve (AUC). Results indicate that all the five machine learning models performed well for shallow landslide susceptibility assessment, but the Logistic Model Tree model (AUC = 0.932) had the highest goodness-of-fit and prediction accuracy, followed by the Logistic Regression (AUC = 0.932), Naïve Bayes Tree (AUC = 0.864), ANN (AUC = 0.860), and Support Vector Machine (AUC = 0.834) models. Therefore, we recommend the use of the Logistic Model Tree model in shallow landslide mapping programs in semi-arid regions to help decision makers, planners, land-use managers, and government agencies mitigate the hazard and risk.

scholarly journals A Novel GIS-Based Random Forest Machine Algorithm for the Spatial Prediction of Shallow Landslide Susceptibility

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet-Hung Dang ◽  
Nhat-Duc Hoang ◽  
Le-Mai-Duyen Nguyen ◽  
Dieu Tien Bui ◽  
Pijush Samui
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Landslide Susceptibility ◽  
Spatial Prediction ◽  
Shallow Landslide ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Conditioning Factors ◽  
Susceptibility Modeling

This study developed and verified a new hybrid machine learning model, named random forest machine (RFM), for the spatial prediction of shallow landslides. RFM is a hybridization of two state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms, random forest classifier (RFC) and support vector machine (SVM), in which RFC is used to generate subsets from training data and SVM is used to build decision functions for these subsets. To construct and verify the hybrid RFM model, a shallow landslide database of the Lang Son area (northern Vietnam) was prepared. The database consisted of 101 shallow landslide polygons and 14 conditioning factors. The relevance of these factors for shallow landslide susceptibility modeling was assessed using the ReliefF method. Experimental results pointed out that the proposed RFM can help to achieve the desired prediction with an F1 score of roughly 0.96. The performance of the RFM was better than those of benchmark approaches, including the SVM, RFC, and logistic regression. Thus, the newly developed RFM is a promising tool to help local authorities in shallow landslide hazard mitigations.

scholarly journals Landslide Detection and Susceptibility Modeling on Cameron Highlands (Malaysia): A Comparison between Random Forest, Logistic Regression and Logistic Model Tree Algorithms

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viet-Ha Nhu ◽  
Ayub Mohammadi ◽  
Himan Shahabi ◽  
Baharin Bin Ahmad ◽  
Nadhir Al-Ansari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Landslide Susceptibility ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Logistic Model ◽  
Model Tree ◽  
Cameron Highlands ◽  
Logistic Model Tree

We used remote sensing techniques and machine learning to detect and map landslides, and landslide susceptibility in the Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. We located 152 landslides using a combination of interferometry synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), Google Earth (GE), and field surveys. Of the total slide locations, 80% (122 landslides) were utilized for training the selected algorithms, and the remaining 20% (30 landslides) were applied for validation purposes. We employed 17 conditioning factors, including slope angle, aspect, elevation, curvature, profile curvature, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), lithology, soil type, land cover, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance to river, distance to fault, distance to road, river density, fault density, and road density, which were produced from satellite imageries, geological map, soil maps, and a digital elevation model (DEM). We used these factors to produce landslide susceptibility maps using logistic regression (LR), logistic model tree (LMT), and random forest (RF) models. To assess prediction accuracy of the models we employed the following statistical measures: negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, root-mean-squared error (RMSE), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Our results indicated that the AUC was 92%, 90%, and 88% for the LMT, LR, and RF algorithms, respectively. To assess model performance, we also applied non-parametric statistical tests of Friedman and Wilcoxon, where the results revealed that there were no practical differences among the used models in the study area. While landslide mapping in tropical environment such as Cameron Highlands remains difficult, the remote sensing (RS) along with machine learning techniques, such as the LMT model, show promise for landslide susceptibility mapping in the study area.

scholarly journals Landslide Susceptibility Modeling Based on GIS and Novel Bagging-Based Kernel Logistic Regression

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Chen ◽  
Himan Shahabi ◽  
Shuai Zhang ◽  
Khabat Khosravi ◽  
Ataollah Shirzadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Landslide Susceptibility ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Machine Method ◽  
Conditioning Factors ◽  
Kernel Logistic Regression ◽  
Susceptibility Modeling ◽  
Tree Classifier ◽  
Predictive Rate

Landslides cause a considerable amount of damage around the world every year. Landslide susceptibility assessments are useful for the mitigation of the associated potential risks to local economic development, land use planning, and decision makers. The main aim of this study was to present a novel hybrid approach of bagging (B)-based kernel logistic regression (KLR), named the BKLR model, for spatial prediction of landslides in the Shangnan County, China. We first selected 15 conditioning factors for landslide susceptibility modeling. Then, the prediction capability of all conditioning factors was evaluated using the least square support vector machine method. Model validation and comparison were performed based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and several statistical-based indexes, including positive predictive rate, negative predictive rate, sensitivity, specificity, kappa index, and root mean square error. Results indicated that the BKLR ensemble model outperformed and outclassed the KLR and the benchmark support vector machine model. Our findings overall confirmed that a combination of the meta model with a decision tree classifier based on a functional algorithm can decrease the over-fitting and variance problems of data, which could enhance the prediction power of the landslide model. The resultant susceptibility maps could be useful for hazard mitigation in the study area and other similar landslide-prone areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document