scholarly journals Twitter as a Medical Media Among French Young Oncologists: Results from a National Survey

Author(s):  
Matthieu Roulleaux Dugage ◽  
Natacha Naoun ◽  
Côme Bommier ◽  
Morgan Michalet ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
...  

AbstractSince its launch in 2006, Twitter has become a commonly used platform for sharing medical information, especially in the field of oncology. However, its role and impact on young oncologists’ education remain unclear. Moreover, COVID-19 and congress virtualization is likely to have modified Twitter use by the medical society.We conducted a national survey (27 questions) in France among medical oncology, hematology, and radiation therapy young doctors to help better understand the role played by Twitter on their medical education. One hundred eighty-three young oncologists participated in our survey. A majority does not use Twitter (72.1%), mostly to reduce their time spent on social media. Participants using Twitter (27.9%) often use it more than once a week, mostly by scrolling on their news feed. Interestingly, they rarely express their own opinion on Twitter: a majority of them (75.5%) tweet less than once a month while the rest of them mostly retweet others’ tweets. They mainly follow English-speaking experts, scientific societies, and medical journals. Pharmaceutical laboratories’ accounts are of less significance. Overall Twitter usage seems increasing since COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent digitalization of congresses. No statistical difference was observed between the baseline characteristics of Twitter users and non-users.This survey shows that Twitter is a relevant mean of continuous medical education used by around a third of French young oncologists, especially since COVID-19 pandemic and the virtualization of congresses. This media should be considered and evaluated for its educational advantages or potential biases.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17545-e17545
Author(s):  
Dominik Berthold ◽  
Francesca Marangoni ◽  
Chatrina Melcher ◽  
Alberto Costa

e17545 Background: Continuous medical education (CME) is critical for physicians, particularly in oncology because of the rapid evolution in diagnosis and treatment of malignancies. Since the fast diffusion of the internet in highly developed as well as less developed nations, online education has become a media to reach potentially a significant number of physicians around the globe. Methods: The European School of Oncology is a non-profit organization dedicated to medical education in oncology. A structured e-learning program was launched in 2008. Interactive live lectures are held by recognized experts in the field and are actively moderated. A tailored webpage www.e-eso.net has been developed. Presenters and participants are connected from their own institutes, often in distant locations. Two formats have been developed: E-grandrounds are weekly sessions on hot-topics without commercial sponsorship. E-oncoreviews are monthly sessions designed to offer a balance and comprehensive overview on a specific topic. Participants can register for free and obtain CME accreditation. Users of the live sessions are encouraged to ask questions by email. Presentations are available online for 6 months. Applications for handheld devices have been developed. Results: Between 2008 and 2012, 4700 users from 117 nations have been registered, using the application at least once. 252 online lectures were held, generating 22.000 views (about 87 participants/presentation). The cost per session was about 4000 $US ( 45$/participant) for technical support. About 100 new users per months are currently registered. None of the presenters or participants had to travel. Conclusions: This is to our knowledge the largest online education program based on non-commercial sponsorship. Online education is feasible, potentially cost-effective and ecologically sustainable. Online education is a way to equal access to medical information for economically less favored nations.


Praxis ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (38) ◽  
pp. 1565-1565
Author(s):  
Wilhelm Vetter ◽  
Sabina Ludin

Praxis ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 099 (07) ◽  
pp. 411-412
Author(s):  
P.J. Marko ◽  
A. Burkhart ◽  
P.A. Krayenbühl ◽  
P.M. Suter

Author(s):  
Roberto Attanasio ◽  
Luca Gualano ◽  
Irene Misischi ◽  
Silvia Caprioli ◽  
Enrico Papini ◽  
...  

Background Conventional tools for medical education are burdened by many drawbacks. Textbooks become rapidly outdated, meeting attendance is expensive, and results reported in journals are not easily suitable for clinical practice. Uptodate and Endotext are excellent online tools, but they have been developed for a clinical context far different from that of our country. Methodology Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AME) charged a task force aiming to develop an educational tool specifically tailored for Italian clinical endocrinologists. Required characteristics were clinical approach, modularity, continuous updating, full online availability (even by mobile devices), open sections and sections for registered members only, opportunity for individualization, indexing and search engine to facilitate browsing. Starting from an open-source platform, Joomla, several changes were implemented. Results Three editors, 2 central editorial secretaries, 30 section coordinators and over 350 authors have been involved in the writing of 21 different sections covering all fields of endocrine and metabolic diseases. The access to Endowiki is free for AME members and is fully open in sections for patients. All readers are requested to serve as referee, pointing to mistakes and need for revision. The system is attended daily by a mean of 250 individuals. Conclusions Endowiki stands alone as an opportunity for medical education in Italy. The big challenges will be the continuous updating and the link to the national certified system for CME.


2020 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
Maureen O’Brien Pott ◽  
Anissa S. Blanshan ◽  
Kelly M. Huneke ◽  
Barbara L. Baasch Thomas ◽  
David A. Cook

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e015145 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C W Wong ◽  
ShanZhu Zhu ◽  
Jason J Ong ◽  
MingHui Peng ◽  
Cindy L K Lam ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document