scholarly journals Model-based safety assessment for conceptual aircraft systems design

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Gradel ◽  
Benedikt Aigner ◽  
Eike Stumpf
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Aircraft Design ◽  
System Safety ◽  
Design Studies ◽  
System Architectures ◽  
Architecture Model ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Technology Modeling ◽  
Conceptual Aircraft Design

AbstractTraditional system technology modeling in conceptual aircraft design mainly relies on empirical knowledge and methods derived from conventional systems, for which valid system architecture designs are known. Since these systems have been proven valid especially from a safety perspective, detailed system safety analyses are usually not necessary. For unconventional systems and innovative technologies, on contrary, new architectures have to be designed and system safety has, therefore, to be taken into account. Therefore, the application of model-based safety assessment (MBSA) for designing system architectures in conceptual aircraft design studies is proposed. A MBSA approach based on a Simulink architecture model is presented which is tailored for use in conceptual design studies. It is applied to the cryocooling system of a hybrid-electric powertrain architecture from an already-published study. The original architecture as well as possible architecture alternatives are investigated. As a result, a safer architecture version with lower number of components can be proposed. The application example indicates that using MBSA in conceptual design benefits the latter by providing insights into safety properties of the system and by pointing out architecture safety weaknesses. This could result in safer, thus more realistic system architectures.

Computational Design Synthesis: A Model-Based Approach for Complex Systems

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Albarello ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Welcomme
Keyword(s):  
Design Space Exploration ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Space Exploration ◽  
Design Rules ◽  
System Architectures ◽  
Architecture Model ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Design Alternatives ◽  
Systems Architectures ◽  
The Impact

The design of systems architectures often involve a combinatorial design-space made of technological and architectural choices. A complete or large exploration of this design space requires the use of a method to generate and evaluate design alternatives. This paper proposes an innovative approach for the design-space exploration of systems architectures. The SAMOA (System Architecture Model-based OptimizAtion) tool associated to the method is also introduced. The method permits to create a large number of various system architectures combining a set of possible components to address given system functions. The method relies on models that are used to represent the problem and the solutions and to evaluate architecture performances. An algorithm first synthesizes design alternatives (a physical architecture associated to a functional allocation) based on the functional architecture of the system, the system interfaces, a library of available components and user-defined design rules. Chains of components are sequentially added to an initially empty architecture until all functions are fulfilled. The design rules permit to guarantee the viability and validity of the chains of components and, consequently, of the generated architectures. The design space exploration is then performed in a smart way through the use of an evolutionary algorithm, the evolution mechanisms of which are specific to system architecting. Evaluation modules permit to assess the performances of alternatives based on the structure of the architecture model and the data embedded in the component models. These performances are used to select the best generated architectures considering constraints and quality metrics. This selection is based on the Pareto-dominance-based NSGA-II algorithm or, alternatively, on an interactive preference-based algorithm. Iterating over this evolution-evaluation-selection process permits to increase the quality of solutions and, thus, to highlight the regions of interest of the design-space which can be used as a base for further manual investigations. By using this method, the system designers have a larger confidence in the optimality of the adopted architecture than using a classical derivative approach as many more solutions are evaluated. Also, the method permits to quickly evaluate the trade-offs between the different considered criteria. Finally, the method can also be used to evaluate the impact of a technology on the system performances not only by a substituting a technology by another but also by adapting the architecture of the system.

scholarly journals Model-based System Safety Assessment of Aircraft Power Plant

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Qi Gong ◽  
Duo Su
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Safety Assessment ◽  
System Safety ◽  
Model Based

scholarly journals Application of Noise Certification Regulations within Conceptual Aircraft Design

Aerospace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Michel Nöding ◽  
Lothar Bertsch
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Aircraft Design ◽  
Low Noise ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Design Phase ◽  
Simulation Process ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Conceptual Design Phase ◽  
Conceptual Aircraft Design

ICAO Annex 16 regulations are used to certify the acoustic performance of subsonic transport aircraft. Each aircraft is classified according to the measured EPNL levels at specific certification locations along the approach and departure. By simulating this certification process, it becomes possible to identify all relevant parameters and assess promising measures to reduce the noise certification levels in compliance with the underlying ICAO regulations, i.e., allowable operating conditions of the aircraft. Furthermore, simulation is the only way to enable an assessment of novel technology and non-existing vehicle concepts, which is the main motivation behind the presented research activities. Consequently, the ICAO Annex 16 regulations are integrated into an existing noise simulation framework at DLR, and the virtual noise certification of novel aircraft concepts is realized at the conceptual design phase. The predicted certification levels can be directly selected as design objectives in order to realize an advantageous ICAO noise category for a new aircraft design, i.e., simultaneously accounting for the design and the resulting flight performance. A detailed assessment and identification of operational limits and allowable flight procedures for each conceptual aircraft design under consideration is enabled. Sensitivity studies can be performed for the relevant input parameters that influence the predicted noise certification levels. Specific noise sources with a dominating impact on the certification noise levels can be identified, and promising additional low-noise measures can be applied within the conceptual design phase. The overall simulation process is applied to existing vehicles in order to assess the validity of the simulation resultsfcompared to published data. Thereafter, the process is applied to some DLR low-noise aircraft concepts to evaluate their noise certification levels. These results can then be compared to other standard noise metrics that are typically applied in order to describe aircraft noise, e.g., SEL isocontour areas. It can be demonstrated that certain technologies can significantly reduce the noise impact along most of an approach or departure flight track but have only a limited influence on the noise certification levels and vice versa. Finally, an outlook of the ongoing developments is provided, in order to apply the new simulation process to supersonic aircraft. Newly proposed regulations for such concepts are implemented into the process in order to evaluate these new regulations and enable direct comparison with existing regulations.

scholarly journals An Approach to Complement Model-Based Vehicle Development by Implementing Future Scenarios

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Christian Raulf ◽  
Moritz Proff ◽  
Tobias Huth ◽  
Thomas Vietor
Keyword(s):  
Systems Engineering ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Future Scenarios ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
System Architectures ◽  
Vehicle Development ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Scenario Technique ◽  
Stakeholder Needs ◽  
Model Based Systems Engineering

Today, vehicle development is already in a process of substantial transformation. Mobility trends can be derived from global megatrends and have a significant influence on the requirements of the developed vehicles. The sociological, technological, economic, ecological, and political developments can be determined by using the scenario technique. The results are recorded in the form of differently shaped scenarios; however, they are mainly document-based. In order to ensure a holistic approach in the sense of model-based systems engineering and to be able to trace the interrelationships of the fast-changing trends and requirements, it is necessary to implement future scenarios in the system model. For this purpose, a method is proposed that enables the consideration of future scenarios in model-based vehicle development. The procedure of the method is presented, and the location of the future scenarios within the system architectures is named. The method is applied and the resulting system views are derived based on the application example of an autonomous people mover. With the help of the described method, it is possible to show the effects of a change of scenario (e.g., best-case and worst-case) and the connections with the highest level of requirements: stakeholder needs.

scholarly journals CONCEPTUAL DESIGN FOR ASSEMBLY IN AEROSPACE INDUSTRY: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORK AND DESIGN PARAMETERS

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 731-740
Author(s):  
Giovanni Formentini ◽  
Claudio Favi ◽  
Claude Cuiller ◽  
Pierre-Eric Dereux ◽  
Francois Bouissiere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Design For Assembly ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Commercial Aircraft ◽  
System Architectures ◽  
Complex Engineering ◽  
Aircraft System ◽  
Definition Of

AbstractOne of the most challenging activity in the engineering design process is the definition of a framework (model and parameters) for the characterization of specific processes such as installation and assembly. Aircraft system architectures are complex structures used to understand relation among elements (modules) inside an aircraft and its evaluation is one of the first activity since the conceptual design. The assessment of aircraft architectures, from the assembly perspective, requires parameter identification as well as the definition of the overall analysis framework (i.e., mathematical models, equations).The paper aims at the analysis of a mathematical framework (structure, equations and parameters) developed to assess the fit for assembly performances of aircraft system architectures by the mean of sensitivity analysis (One-Factor-At-Time method). The sensitivity analysis was performed on a complex engineering framework, i.e. the Conceptual Design for Assembly (CDfA) methodology, which is characterized by level, domains and attributes (parameters). A commercial aircraft cabin system was used as a case study to understand the use of different mathematical operators as well as the way to cluster attributes.

Aerodynamics and Conceptual Design Studies on an Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Configuration

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 454-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell M. Cummings ◽  
Carsten M. Liersch ◽  
Andreas Schütte ◽  
Kerstin C. Huber
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Design Studies ◽  
Aerial Vehicle ◽  
Vehicle Configuration

ADS-B: Probabilistic Safety Assessment

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 887-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Busyairah Syd Ali ◽  
Washington Yotto Ochieng ◽  
Arnab Majumdar
Keyword(s):  
Safety Assessment ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Fault Tree Analysis ◽  
Performance Standards ◽  
System Safety ◽  
Probabilistic Safety Assessment ◽  
Assessment Approach ◽  
Primary Means ◽  
Importance Analysis ◽  
Probabilistic Safety

In the effort to quantify Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) system safety, the authors have identified potential ADS-B failure modes in Syd Ali et al. (2014). Based on the findings, six potential hazards of ADS-B are identified in this paper. The authors then applied the Probabilistic Safety Assessment approach which includes Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and Importance Analysis methods to quantify the system safety. FTA is applied to measure ADS-B system availability for each identified hazard while Importance Analysis is conducted to identify the most significant failure modes that may lead to the occurrence of the hazards. In addition, risk significance and safety significance of each failure mode are also identified. The result shows that the availability for the ADS-B system as a sole surveillance means is low at 0·898 in comparison to the availability of ADS-B system as supplemental or as primary means of surveillance at 0·95 and 0·999 respectively. The latter availability values are obtained from Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) for Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (DO-242A).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document