The association of diabetes risk score and body mass index with incidence of diabetes among urban and rural adult communities in Qingdao, China

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 730-738
Author(s):  
Jianping Sun ◽  
Guorong Bao ◽  
Jing Cui ◽  
Nafeesa Yasmeen ◽  
Bilal Aslam ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 366 ◽  
Author(s):  
SatyendraKumar Sonkar ◽  
MohammadMustufa Khan ◽  
GyanendraKumar Sonkar ◽  
Roshan Alam ◽  
Sudhir Mehrotra ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 10-14
Author(s):  
Ruxandra Roşescu ◽  
Oana Cristina Cînpeanu ◽  
Claudiu Teodorescu ◽  
Monica Tarcea

AbstractThe prevalence of diabetes has doubled in the last 4 decades in Romania. Our goal was to identify the risk profile in a group of Argeş county patients based on the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) score and main variables analysed. Our study was based on a pilot study on a group of 103 patients. The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score was used to calculate the risk of developing diabetes for our patients. In our group, the FINDRISC score was not statistically significantly correlated with body mass index, but was statistically significantly correlated with hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-Cholesterol levels, hyperuricemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension. The older you get, the higher your risk of developing diabetes. The present study demonstrates the importance of lifestyle in terms of the risk of developing diabetes, supporting the need to implement more effective health education measures on a balanced lifestyle and establishing interdisciplinary mechanisms of collaboration between physician, nutritionist and psychologist to promote health.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Najla A Al-Lawati ◽  
Helman Alfonso ◽  
Jawad Al-Lawati

Objective: To develop and validate a diabetic risk score model, as a non-invasive and selfadministered screening tool, to be used in the general Omani population. Methods: The World Health Survey (WHS) 2008 data from Oman (n=2,720) was used to develop the risk score model. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise method was implemented to obtain risk factors regression coefficients for gender, age, educational attainment, marital status, place of residence, hypertension, body mass index, waist circumference, tobacco use, daily fruits and vegetables intake and weekly physical activity. The model coefficients were multiplied by a factor of five to allocate each variable category a risk score. The total score was calculated as the sum of these individual scores. The score was validated using another Omani cohort (Sur Survey 2006 dataset, n=1,355) Page 2 of 24 by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and optimal score sensitivity and specificity were determined. Results: A robust diabetes risk score model was produced, which composed of eight variables (age, gender, education level, marital status, place of residence, hypertension, smoking status and body mass index) with an optimal cutoff point of ≥15 to classify persons with possible prevalent T2DM. At this cutoff point, the model had a sensitivity of 71.1%, specificity of 74.4% and AUC of 0.80 (95% CI) 0.7–0.82, when internally validated (in the WHS 2008 cohort). When the model was externally validated (using the Sur 2006 cohort), the optimal cutoff point for the score was ≥13, with a lower sensitivity (54%), higher specificity (79%) and an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.70–0.78). In contrast, test of the old Omani, Kuwaiti, Saudi and Finnish diabetes risk scores, in both of our study populations, showed poor performance of these models among Omanis with poor sensitivity (29% to 63.5%) and reasonable specificity (70% to 80%). Conclusion: The developed diabetes risk score for screening prevalent T2DM, provides an easy-to-use self-administered tool to identify most individuals at risk of this condition in Oman. The score incorporates eight diabetes-associated risk factors that can also act as a tool to increase people’s awareness about the importance of diabetes-related risk factors and provide information for policy makers to establish a diabetes prevention programs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Laura Gray ◽  
Yogini Chudasama ◽  
Alison Dunkley ◽  
Freya Tyrer ◽  
Rebecca Spong ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indira Rocío Mendiola Pastrana ◽  
Irasema Isabel Urbina Aranda ◽  
Alejandro Edgar Muñoz Simón ◽  
Guillermina Juanico Morales ◽  
Geovani López Ortiz

<p><span><strong>Objetivo:</strong> evaluar el desempeño del <em>Finnish Diabetes Risk Score</em> (findrisc) como prueba de tamizaje para diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (dm2). <strong>Métodos:</strong> estudio de validación de prueba diagnóstica. Se seleccionaron 295 participantes sin diagnóstico de dm2, adscritos a una unidad de medicina familiar de Acapulco, Guerrero, México, mediante muestreo aleatorio simple. Se aplicó el cuestionario findrisc para calificar el nivel de riesgo para desarrollo de dm2. Se realizó toma de glucosa en ayuno como estándar de oro para diagnóstico de dm2. Se realizó prueba de </span><span>χ</span><span>2 de Mantel y Haenszel y cálculo de or para medir la asociación y la magnitud de ésta, así como el cálculo de sensibilidad, especificidad y valores predictivos para evaluar el desempeño del cuestionario. <strong>Resultados:</strong> se determinó que 156 pacientes (52.84%) presentaban alto riesgo para desarrollar dm2 en el cuestionario, 35 de los cuales fueron diagnosticados con dm2 y 49 con prediabetes. De los pacientes con riesgo bajo en el cuestionario, 26 presentaron prediabetes y 5 dm2. Un puntaje ≥15 por findrisc se asoció con glucosa alterada en ayuno ≥100mg/dl (or: 4.06, p=0.0001), prediabetes (or: 2.82, p=0.0002) y dm2 (or: 7.75, p=0.0001). La sensibilidad y especificidad del cuestionario para el diagnóstico de dm2 fue 87.50% y 52.55% respectivamente, con ic 95% estadísticamente significativos. <strong>Conclusión:</strong> el findrisc es una herramienta que potencialmente se puede ocupar para el tamizaje de dm2 en la población mexicana, es práctica, sencilla, rápida, no invasiva, económica y puede ser utilizada en la práctica diaria del médico familiar.</span></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110185
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Nanda ◽  
Audry S. Chacin Suarez ◽  
Loren Toussaint ◽  
Ann Vincent ◽  
Karen M. Fischer ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to investigate body mass index, multi-morbidity, and COVID-19 Risk Score as predictors of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Patients Patients from this study are from a well-characterized patient cohort collected at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2020 and May 23, 2020; with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis defined as a positive result on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assays from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Measures Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical record. The data included: date of birth, gender, ethnicity, race, marital status, medications (active COVID-19 agents), weight and height (from which the Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated, history of smoking, and comorbid conditions to calculate the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the U.S Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) multi-morbidity score. An additional COVID-19 Risk Score was also included. Outcomes included hospital admission, ICU admission, and death. Results Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the impact on mortality or hospital admission. Age, sex, and race (white/Latino, white/non-Latino, other, did not disclose) were adjusted for in the model. Patients with higher COVID-19 Risk Scores had a significantly higher likelihood of being at least admitted to the hospital (HR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.30, 2.50; P < .001), or experiencing death or inpatient admission (includes ICU admissions) (HR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.42; P = .028). Age was the only statistically significant demographic predictor, but obesity was not a significant predictor of any of the outcomes. Conclusion Age and COVID-19 Risk Scores were significant predictors of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Further work should examine the properties of the COVID-19 Risk Factors Scale.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne F. Awad ◽  
Soha R. Dargham ◽  
Amine A. Toumi ◽  
Elsy M. Dumit ◽  
Katie G. El-Nahas ◽  
...  

AbstractWe developed a diabetes risk score using a novel analytical approach and tested its diagnostic performance to detect individuals at high risk of diabetes, by applying it to the Qatari population. A representative random sample of 5,000 Qataris selected at different time points was simulated using a diabetes mathematical model. Logistic regression was used to derive the score using age, sex, obesity, smoking, and physical inactivity as predictive variables. Performance diagnostics, validity, and potential yields of a diabetes testing program were evaluated. In 2020, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.79 and sensitivity and specificity were 79.0% and 66.8%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 36.1% and 93.0%, with 42.0% of Qataris being at high diabetes risk. In 2030, projected AUC was 0.78 and sensitivity and specificity were 77.5% and 65.8%. PPV and NPV were 36.8% and 92.0%, with 43.0% of Qataris being at high diabetes risk. In 2050, AUC was 0.76 and sensitivity and specificity were 74.4% and 64.5%. PPV and NPV were 40.4% and 88.7%, with 45.0% of Qataris being at high diabetes risk. This model-based score demonstrated comparable performance to a data-derived score. The derived self-complete risk score provides an effective tool for initial diabetes screening, and for targeted lifestyle counselling and prevention programs.


Author(s):  
Nandakrishna Bolanthakodi ◽  
Avinash Holla ◽  
Sudha Vidyasagar ◽  
Laxminarayan Bairy ◽  
B. A. Shastry ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e0141260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Hu ◽  
Chad D. Huff ◽  
Yuko Yamamura ◽  
Xifeng Wu ◽  
Sara S. Strom

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document