Effect of Seismic Zone and Story Height on Response Reduction Factor for SMRF Designed According to IS 1893(Part-1):2002

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Pravin Venkat Rao ◽  
L. M. Gupta
Author(s):  
Alok Bhowmick ◽  
Harpreet Singh

<p>Evolution of seismic design provisions in various Indian Standards over the last 50 years have been reviewed in this paper. Seismic provisions of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) code (IS 1893), Indian Road Congress (IRC) standard (IRC:6 &amp; IRC:SP:114) and Indian Railway standards (IRS code) are compared. Design parameters for comparison include the seismic zone factor / peak ground acceleration, importance factor, local soil condition, design spectra and response reduction factor.</p>


Author(s):  
Akihisa Sugiyama ◽  
Koji Setta ◽  
Yoji Kawamoto ◽  
Koji Hamada ◽  
Hideyuki Morita ◽  
...  

As for thin walled cylindrical liquid storage tanks in nuclear power plants, the current elastic design guideline against seismic loading might result in too conservative component design as compared with elasto-plastic design in general industries. Therefore, it is thought possible to make the design guideline more reasonable by taking dynamic response reduction into account. In this series of study, experiments using scaled models were carried out, and seismic behavior of thin walled cylindrical liquid storage tanks was simulated to investigate energy absorption capacity and seismic resistance of those tanks. In this 3rd report of series of studies, seismic behavior of tanks was simulated to estimate a dynamic response reduction factor. This factor is based on the energy absorption capacity of structures. Through experiments and numerical study, a response reduction factor to design thin walled cylindrical liquid storage tanks has been proposed.


1989 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Suzuki ◽  
A. Sone

A new load combination scheme for seismic response calculation of piping systems subjected to multiple support excitations is presented. This scheme has an advantage, such that the cross-correlation among support excitations are properly taken into account by use of a stationary random vibration approach. The authors also present the idea of generating a “multi-excitation floor response spectrum.” First, using a simple analytical SDOF piping system to two support excitations and a simple Z-shaped piping model for shaking test, the combination law is supplied to various correlation cases of two support excitations and the maximum responses of piping in a fundamental mode is calculated. Second, nonlinear characteristics such as gap and friction appearing between piping itself and supports are specifically investigated. The response effect due to these nonlinearities is evaluated by the results through the shaking test with a piping-support structural model, and the amount of response reduction effect is represented by “a response reduction factor β.”


2020 ◽  
pp. 136943322097556
Author(s):  
Jun Chen ◽  
Jingya Ren ◽  
Vitomir Racic

Bouncing is a typical rhythmic crowd activity in entertaining venues, such as concert halls and stadia. When the activity’s frequency is close to the natural frequency of the occupied structure, the corresponding bouncing loads can cause intense structural vibrations resulting in vibration serviceability problems, even structural damage. This study suggests a method for prediction of vibration response due to crowd bouncing by a response reduction factor (RRF) in conjunction with a previously established response spectrum approach pertinent to a single person bouncing. The RRF is defined as a ratio between structural responses with and without taking into account synchronization of body movements of individuals in a bouncing crowd. The variations of RRF with number of persons, structural frequency, bouncing frequency and structural damping ratios have been studied using experimental records of crowd bouncing loads. Based on the findings a practical design curve for RRF has been proposed. Application of the proposed method has been validated on numerical simulations and field measurements of a long-span floor subjected to crowd bouncing loads.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Mayank Desai ◽  
Anurag Nambiar ◽  
Shefali Gahrana ◽  
Ronak Motiani ◽  
J.R. Kunal

Author(s):  
Tatsuya Yamauchi ◽  
Kazumasa Tsuchikawa ◽  
Arata Masuda ◽  
Akira Sone

A load combination method for seismic response calculation of piping systems with friction characteristics to multiple support excitations is presented. This method has an advantage, such that the cross-correlation among support excitations and “response reduction factor” due to friction are taken into account by use of a stationary random vibration theory approach. Using a simple analytical SDOF piping system with friction characteristics to two support excitations, This method is supplied to various correlation cases of two support excitations and friction characteristics and the maximum responses of piping is calculated. From these calculation results, it is clear that the maximum acceleration responses of nonlinear piping systems can also depend on the cross-correlation among support excitations and can be reduced due to the friction effect. Finally, the conventional equation of the response reduction factor and the maximum response calculated by the proposed method are presented for practical use.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagun Kandel ◽  
Rajan Suwal

It is important for the structure to be economical and still have a high level of life safety. The lateral force sustained by the structures during a large earthquake would be several times larger than the lateral force for which the structures are designed. This is opposite to the fact that design loads such as gravity in codes are usually higher than the actual anticipated load. It is based on the probability that the occurrence of large earthquakes is quite rare and the capacity of the structure to absorb energy. The co-factors of response reduction factor which is the overstrength factor and ductility factor reduce the design horizontal base shear coefficient. A total of 36 low-rise residential buildings having different storey, bay and bay lengths are selected and analysed in this paper. NBC 105: 2020 is selected for the seismic design of RC buildings while provision provided in FEMA 356:2000 is used to carry out non-linear pushover analysis. The results indicated that between the different structures, the value of overstrength factor and ductility factor has a high deviation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1197 (1) ◽  
pp. 012005
Author(s):  
Trupti Dongare ◽  
Preeti Kulkarni

Abstract In recent times, the RC building construction with vertical discontinuity that is floating column structures are unavoidable feature and increases trends day by day. To reduce lateral forces the earthquake resistance structures are designed so the response reduction factor (R) is used to determine these lateral forces by using base shear values. The R factor depends upon the overstrength factor, ductility factor, redundancy factor also the sizes of columns, types of soil, zones and load transferring path, etc. The IS code provides response reduction factor only for OMRF and SMRF along with other structures like Braced frame system, Structural wall system, Dual system, Flat slab structure wall system, etc. so there are no codal provisions for floating column structures. Thus it is essential to study the real behaviours of RC buildings with discontinuity in load transferring path through non-linear static analysis, so the present research work is done on trying to find R factor for vertical discontinuous asymmetrical structure for different soil conditions and different positions of floating column using moment resisting frames. And the structure is analyzed by response spectrum analysis and non-linear static analysis using SAP2000 software.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document