Abstract
Background
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated their guidance for the management of patients with stable chest pain and recommended that all patients undergo computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). This update has sparked a great deal of debate, and was followed by upgrade of CTCA into a Class I indication in the recent ESC guidelines. The cost-effectiveness of using CTCA as first line investigation is still unclear.
Purpose
To describe the current clinical pathway of patients with stable chest pain presented to outpatient clinics, assess the compliance with the updated NICE guideline, and explore the costs and health outcomes of different non-invasive diagnostic tests in real-world clinical setting.
Methods
We used data of 4,297 patients who attended chest pain clinics in Oxford between 1 January 2014 and 31 July 2018. Data included clinical presentation (e.g. age and previous cardiovascular conditions), diagnostic tests, outpatient visits, hospitalization, and hospital mortality and was compared between 6 alternative first-line diagnostic tests. Multinomial regressions were performed to estimate the probability of receiving each alternative and the associated cost after adjusting for clinical presentation. A decision tree was developed to describe the clinical pathway for each alternative first-line diagnostic in terms of subsequent diagnostic tests and treatments and to estimate the associated costs and life days.
Results
The proportion of patients who received CTCA as first line diagnostic test increased from 1% in 2014 to 17% in 2018, while the publication of the updated NICE guidelines in 2016 led to a threefold increase in this proportion. CTCA is less likely to be provided as a first-line diagnostic to patients who are younger age, males, smokers, and have angina, PVD, or diabetes. The standardised rate of hospital admission was the lowest in the exercise ECG cohort (0.35 admissions per 1,000 life-days) followed by the CTCA cohort (0.40 admissions per 1,000 life-days) while the latter cohort had the lowest standardised rate of cardiovascular treatment (2.74% per 1,000 life days). Stress echocardiography and MPS were associated with higher costs compared with CTCA, other ECG, and exercise ECG after adjusting for clinical presentation and days of follow-up. CTCA is the pathway most likely to be cost-effective, even compared to exercise ECG, while the other diagnostic alternatives are dominated (i.e. they cost more for less life-days).
Conclusions
Currently, the updated NICE guidelines for stable chest pain are implemented only to a fifth of the cases in England. Our findings support existing evidence that CTCA is the most-cost effective first-line diagnostic test for this population. Hopefully, this will inform the debate around the implementation of the guidelines and help commissioning and clinical decision processes worldwide.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Institute of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Real world cost and health outcomes of patients presented with chest pain in England: which is the most cost-effective first-line test?