In 2019, the National Institute for Museums and
Public Collections in cooperation with the Państwowy Instytut
Wydawniczy published the 1917 book by Mieczysław Treter
titled Contemporary Museums as the first volume in the
Monuments of Polish Museology Series. The study consists of
two parts originally released in ‘Muzeum Polskie’ published by
Treter in Kiev; it was an ephemeral periodical associated with
the Society for the Protection of Monuments of the Past, active
predominantly in the Kingdom of Poland, but also boasting
numerous branches in Polish communities throughout Russia.
The Author opens the first part of a theoretical format with
a synthesized presentation of the genesis of the museum
institution (also on the territory of the Polish-Lithuanian
Commonwealth), to later follow to its analysis in view of its
collecting and displaying character, classification according to
the typical factual areas it covers, chronology, and territory
(general natural history museums, general history ones,
technological ones, ethnographic ones, historical-social ones,
historical-artistic ones); moreover, he tackles questions like
a museum exhibition, management, a museum building.
In Treter’s view the museum’s mission is not to provide
simple entertainment, neither is it to create autonomous
beauty (realm of art), but it is of a strictly scientific character,
meant to serve science and its promotion, though through
this museums become elitist: by serving mainly science,
they cannot provide entertainment and excitement to every
amateur, neither are they, as such, works of art to which
purely aesthetical criteria could be applied.
The second part of Treter’s study is an extensive outline of
the situation of Polish museums on the eve of WWI, in a way
overshadowed by the first congress of Polish museologists,
and in the perspective of the ‘museum world’ of the Second
Polish Republic. It is an outline for the monograph on Polish
museums, a kind of a report on their condition as in 1914
with some references to later years. Through this it becomes
as if a closure of the first period of their history, which the
Author, when involved in writing his study, could obviously
only instinctively anticipate.