Therapeutic drug monitoring improves seizure control and reduces anticonvulsant side-effects in patients with refractory epilepsy

Seizure ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J.W. McKee ◽  
I. Percy-Robb ◽  
M.J. Brodie
Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 263
Author(s):  
Carolina Osorio ◽  
Laura Garzón ◽  
Diego Jaimes ◽  
Edwin Silva ◽  
Rosa-Helena Bustos

Antimicrobial resistance (AR) is a problem that threatens the search for adequate safe and effective antibiotic therapy against multi-resistant bacteria like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) and Clostridium difficile, among others. Daptomycin is the treatment of choice for some infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria, indicated most of the time in patients with special clinical conditions where its high pharmacokinetic variability (PK) does not allow adequate plasma concentrations to be reached. The objective of this review is to describe the data available about the type of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) method used and described so far in hospitalized patients with daptomycin and to describe its impact on therapeutic success, suppression of bacterial resistance, and control of side effects. The need to create worldwide strategies for the appropriate use of antibiotics is clear, and one of these is the performance of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). TDM helps to achieve a dose adjustment and obtain a favorable clinical outcome for patients by measuring plasma concentrations of an administered drug, making a rational interpretation guided by a predefined concentration range, and, thus, adjusting dosages individually.


2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1928-1931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven C Stoner ◽  
Jessica W Lea ◽  
Angel L Wolf ◽  
Arnaldo A Berges

OBJECTIVE To report the case of a patient who experienced adverse events in succession to antiepileptic medications being used for both antiepileptic and mood-stabilization benefit. CASE SUMMARY A 46-year-old white woman developed hyponatremia with carbamazepine, hyperammonemia with divalproex, cognitive impairment with topiramate, and hyponatremia with oxcarbazepine. The patient was stabilized physically and psychiatrically on levetiracetam without any noted adverse events. DISCUSSION The adverse events in this report have been associated with the medications in question. The patient's presentation is unique, as she developed adverse events in succession to antiepileptic drugs being used to treat both a seizure disorder and symptoms of mood instability. The Naranjo rankings for the reported adverse events indicated the associations were probable (carbamazepine, divalproex, oxcarbazepine) and possible (topiramate). After repeated incidences of intolerability to these drugs, levetiracetam was initiated and provided both seizure control and mood-stabilizing benefits, which eventually led to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS Levetiracetam may provide mood-stabilizing qualities through a mechanism that is unique from that of other antiepileptic agents used for their mood-stabilizing properties. There are potential advantages with levetiracetam, as no specific therapeutic drug monitoring parameters need to be followed after its introduction. Additionally, this case emphasizes the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring and frequent assessments to prevent physical and psychiatric adverse reactions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zanab Al-Roubaie ◽  
Elena Guadagno ◽  
Agnihotram V. Ramanakumar ◽  
Afsheen Q. Khan ◽  
Kenneth A. Myers

ObjectiveTo systematically review and evaluate the available evidence supporting or refuting clinical use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Cochrane, PubMed, Africa-Wide Information, Web of Science, and grey literature. Randomized controlled studies and observational studies that compared the clinical outcomes of TDM vs non-TDM were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. The primary outcome was seizure control; adverse effects were considered as secondary outcomes. The PROSPERO ID of this systematic review's protocol is CRD42018089925.ResultsSixteen studies were identified meeting eligibility requirements. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 meta-analysis, and 11 quasiexperimental (QE) studies were included in the systematic review. Results from the analysis of RCTs showed no significant positive effect of TDM on seizure outcome (only 25% positive effect of phenytoin). However, some of the QE studies found that TDM was associated with better seizure control or lower rates of adverse effects. The existing evidence from various designs has shown various methodological implications, which warrants inconclusive results and highlights the requirement of more number of studies in this line.ConclusionsIf optimally implemented, TDM may enhance clinical care, particularly for phenytoin and other AEDs with complex pharmacokinetics. However, the ideal method for implementation is unclear, and serum drug levels should be considered in context with patient-reported clinical data regarding seizure control and adverse events.


AIDS ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 2083-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Gatti ◽  
Antonio Di Biagio ◽  
Rosetta Casazza ◽  
Cleta De Pascalis ◽  
Matteo Bassetti ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 1-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakila Thangaratinam ◽  
Nadine Marlin ◽  
Sian Newton ◽  
Annalise Weckesser ◽  
Manny Bagary ◽  
...  

Background Pregnant women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may experience a reduction in serum AED levels. This has the potential to worsen seizure control. Objective To determine if, in pregnant women with epilepsy on AEDs, additional therapeutic drug monitoring reduces seizure deterioration compared with clinical features monitoring after a reduction in serum AED levels. Design A double-blind, randomised trial nested within a cohort study was conducted and a qualitative study of acceptability of the two strategies was undertaken. Stratified block randomisation with a 1 : 1 allocation method was carried out. Setting Fifty obstetric and epilepsy clinics in secondary and tertiary care units in the UK. Participants Pregnant women with epilepsy on one or more of the following AEDs: lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin or levetiracetam. Women with a ≥ 25% decrease in serum AED level from baseline were randomised to therapeutic drug monitoring or clinical features monitoring strategies. Interventions In the therapeutic drug monitoring group, clinicians had access to clinical findings and monthly serum AED levels to guide AED dosage adjustment for seizure control. In the clinical features monitoring group, AED dosage adjustment was based only on clinical features. Main outcome measures Primary outcome – seizure deterioration, defined as time to first seizure and to all seizures after randomisation per woman until 6 weeks post partum. Secondary outcomes – pregnancy complications in mother and offspring, maternal quality of life, seizure rates in cohorts with stable serum AED level, AED dose exposure and adverse events related to AEDs. Analysis Analysis of time to first and to all seizures after randomisation was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariate failure time analysis by the Andersen–Gill model. The effects were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios. Results A total of 130 women were randomised to the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 133 to the clinical features monitoring group; 294 women did not have a reduction in serum AED level. A total of 127 women in the therapeutic drug monitoring group and 130 women in the clinical features monitoring group (98% of complete data) were included in the primary analysis. There were no significant differences in the time to first seizure (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.2) or timing of all seizures after randomisation (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.7 to 2.5) between both trial groups. In comparison with the group with stable serum AED levels, there were no significant increases in seizures in the clinical features monitoring (odds ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.5) or therapeutic drug monitoring group (odds ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.5) associated with a reduction in serum AED levels. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups, except for higher cord blood levels of lamotrigine (MD 0.55 mg/l, 95% CI 0.11 to 1 mg/l) or levetiracetam (MD 7.8 mg/l, 95% CI 0.86 to 14.8 mg/l) in the therapeutic drug monitoring group than in the clinical features monitoring group. There were no differences between the groups on daily AED exposure or quality of life. An increase in exposure to lamotrigine, levetiracetam and carbamazepine significantly increased the cord blood levels of the AEDs, but not maternal or fetal complications. Women with epilepsy perceived the need for weighing up their increased vulnerability to seizures during pregnancy against the side effects of AEDs. Limitations Fewer women than the original target were recruited. Conclusion There is no evidence to suggest that regular monitoring of serum AED levels in pregnancy improves seizure control or affects maternal or fetal outcomes. Future work recommendations Further evaluation of the risks of seizure deterioration for various threshold levels of reduction in AEDs and the long-term neurodevelopment of infants born to mothers in both randomised groups is needed. An individualised prediction model will help to identify those women who need close monitoring in pregnancy. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01253916. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 22, No. 23. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (02) ◽  
pp. 197-201
Author(s):  
Shah KHALID ◽  
MOWADAT HUSSAIN RANA ◽  
NAJAM AKHTAR

Introduction: Despite advancements in the treatment of depression and availability of newer compounds, TCAs likeamitriptyline remain to be the cornerstone of antidepressive therapy for more than three decades, however significantly more patients receivinga tricyclic withdraw from treatment mainly because of side effects. Higher response, lower incidence of side effects and improved compliancecan be enhanced by the optimal use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM). No research data is currently available on the therapeutic drugmonitoring of TCAs in Pakistan. Objectives: To compare the relative efficacy of Tricyclic antidepressant in the treatment of depression, with andwithout Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Main Outcome Measures: Changes in HAMD scores in patients on TCAs. Study Design: A Quasiexperimental study design was used. Setting: The study was conducted at Department of Psychiatry, Military Hospital Rawalpindi. Subjects:34 patients completed the study in the monitored group (with TDM) and 33 in control group (without TDM). Methods: Serum TCA levels andHAMD scores at baseline and subsequently at sixth, eighth and tenth week of treatment were collected. In all the subjects, all the blood sampleswere drawn as a fasting sample in early morning. Results: The mean age of the monitored group was 31.97 years (SD=10.432) while that of thecontrol group was 33.52 years (SD=9.385). in the monitored group 20 (58.82 %) of the patients were males while 14 (41.17%) were females, inthe control group 22 (66.66%) were males and 11(33.33%) were female patients. A significant reduction in HAMD scores was noted at 8 weeksof treatment. The groups did not differ in terms of efficacy of TCAs, however the monitored group had fewer dropouts than the control group.Conclusions: Lower incidence of side effects and improved compliance can be enhanced by the optimal use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring(TDM) of TCAs.


Drug Safety ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 919-990
Author(s):  
A S Lemaire-Hurtel ◽  
L Masson ◽  
L Hary ◽  
H Masson ◽  
M Andrejak

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (35) ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
T. A. Rodina ◽  
E. S. Melnikov

There was shown that therapeutic drug monitoring by liquid tandem mass spectrometry is essential not only for the drugs with a narrow therapeutic window but also for “simple” medicines like anti‑hypertension and anticoagulant drugs. The examples of choosing an individual therapy and adjusting the drug dosage to eliminate side effects were given. The cases of solving non‑standard situations that arise during bioanalytical studies were considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document