Diagnosis of meniscal tears through automated interpretation of medical reports via machine learning

Author(s):  
Aydin Eresen
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (01) ◽  
pp. 031-041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Rabhi ◽  
Jérémie Jakubowicz ◽  
Marie-Helene Metzger

Objective The objective of this article was to compare the performances of health care-associated infection (HAI) detection between deep learning and conventional machine learning (ML) methods in French medical reports. Methods The corpus consisted in different types of medical reports (discharge summaries, surgery reports, consultation reports, etc.). A total of 1,531 medical text documents were extracted and deidentified in three French university hospitals. Each of them was labeled as presence (1) or absence (0) of HAI. We started by normalizing the records using a list of preprocessing techniques. We calculated an overall performance metric, the F1 Score, to compare a deep learning method (convolutional neural network [CNN]) with the most popular conventional ML models (Bernoulli and multi-naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, random forests, extra-trees, gradient boosting, support vector machines). We applied the hyperparameter Bayesian optimization for each model based on its HAI identification performances. We included the set of text representation as an additional hyperparameter for each model, using four different text representations (bag of words, term frequency–inverse document frequency, word2vec, and Glove). Results CNN outperforms all other conventional ML algorithms for HAI classification. The best F1 Score of 97.7% ± 3.6% and best area under the curve score of 99.8% ± 0.41% were achieved when CNN was directly applied to the processed clinical notes without a pretrained word2vec embedding. Through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we could achieve a good balance between false notifications (with a specificity equal to 0.937) and system detection capability (with a sensitivity equal to 0.962) using the Youden's index reference. Conclusions The main drawback of CNNs is their opacity. To address this issue, we investigated CNN inner layers' activation values to visualize the most meaningful phrases in a document. This method could be used to build a phrase-based medical assistant algorithm to help the infection control practitioner to select relevant medical records. Our study demonstrated that deep learning approach outperforms other classification learning algorithms for automatically identifying HAIs in medical reports.


CNS Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. CNS56
Author(s):  
Siri Sahib S Khalsa ◽  
Todd C Hollon ◽  
Arjun Adapa ◽  
Esteban Urias ◽  
Sudharsan Srinivasan ◽  
...  

The discovery of a new mass involving the brain or spine typically prompts referral to a neurosurgeon to consider biopsy or surgical resection. Intraoperative decision-making depends significantly on the histologic diagnosis, which is often established when a small specimen is sent for immediate interpretation by a neuropathologist. Access to neuropathologists may be limited in resource-poor settings, which has prompted several groups to develop machine learning algorithms for automated interpretation. Most attempts have focused on fixed histopathology specimens, which do not apply in the intraoperative setting. The greatest potential for clinical impact probably lies in the automated diagnosis of intraoperative specimens. Successful future studies may use machine learning to automatically classify whole-slide intraoperative specimens among a wide array of potential diagnoses.


Author(s):  
Joel En Wei Koh ◽  
Simona De Michele ◽  
Vidya K Sudarshan ◽  
V Jahmunah ◽  
Edward J. Ciaccio ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. R115-R125 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Alsharqi ◽  
W J Woodward ◽  
J A Mumith ◽  
D C Markham ◽  
R Upton ◽  
...  

Echocardiography plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. However, interpretation remains largely reliant on the subjective expertise of the operator. As a result inter-operator variability and experience can lead to incorrect diagnoses. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies provide new possibilities for echocardiography to generate accurate, consistent and automated interpretation of echocardiograms, thus potentially reducing the risk of human error. In this review, we discuss a subfield of AI relevant to image interpretation, called machine learning, and its potential to enhance the diagnostic performance of echocardiography. We discuss recent applications of these methods and future directions for AI-assisted interpretation of echocardiograms. The research suggests it is feasible to apply machine learning models to provide rapid, highly accurate and consistent assessment of echocardiograms, comparable to clinicians. These algorithms are capable of accurately quantifying a wide range of features, such as the severity of valvular heart disease or the ischaemic burden in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the applications and their use are still in their infancy within the field of echocardiography. Research to refine methods and validate their use for automation, quantification and diagnosis are in progress. Widespread adoption of robust AI tools in clinical echocardiography practice should follow and have the potential to deliver significant benefits for patient outcome.


Author(s):  
Maria Frasca ◽  
Genoveffa Tortora

AbstractIn the last few years, the integration of researches in Computer Science and medical fields has made available to the scientific community an enormous amount of data, stored in databases. In this paper, we analyze the data available in the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI), a comprehensive observational, multi-center study designed to identify progression biomarkers important for better treatments for Parkinson’s disease. The data of PPMI participants are collected through a comprehensive battery of tests and assessments including Magnetic Resonance Imaging and DATscan imaging, collection of blood, cerebral spinal fluid, and urine samples, as well as cognitive and motor evaluations. To this aim, we propose a technique to identify a correlation between the biomedical data in the PPMI dataset for verifying the consistency of medical reports formulated during the visits and allow to correctly categorize the various patients. To correlate the information of each patient’s medical report, Information Retrieval and Machine Learning techniques have been adopted, including the Latent Semantic Analysis, Text2Vec and Doc2Vec techniques. Then, patients are grouped and classified into affected or not by using clustering algorithms according to the similarity of medical reports. Finally, we have adopted a visualization system based on the D3 framework to visualize correlations among medical reports with an interactive chart, and to support the doctor in analyzing the chronological sequence of visits in order to diagnose Parkinson’s disease early.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrthe Faber

Abstract Gilead et al. state that abstraction supports mental travel, and that mental travel critically relies on abstraction. I propose an important addition to this theoretical framework, namely that mental travel might also support abstraction. Specifically, I argue that spontaneous mental travel (mind wandering), much like data augmentation in machine learning, provides variability in mental content and context necessary for abstraction.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract Meniscal tears and osteoarthritis (osteoarthrosis, degenerative arthritis, or degenerative joint disease) are two of the most common conditions involving the knee. This article includes definitions of apportionment and causes; presents a case report of initial and recurrent tears of the medial meniscus plus osteoarthritis (OA) in the medial compartment of the knee; and addresses questions regarding apportionment. The authors, experienced impairment raters who are knowledgeable regarding the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), show that, when instructions on impairment rating are incomplete, unclear, or inconsistent, interrater reliability diminishes (different physicians may derive different impairment estimates). Accurate apportionment of impairment is a demanding task that requires detailed knowledge of causation for the conditions in question; the mechanisms of injury or extent of exposures; prior and current symptoms, functional status, physical findings, and clinical study results; and use of the appropriate edition of the AMA Guides. Sometimes the available data are incomplete, requiring the rating physician to make assumptions. However, if those assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the medical literature and facts of the case, if the causation analysis is plausible, and if the examiner follows impairment rating instructions in the AMA Guides (or at least uses a rational and hence defensible method when instructions are suboptimal), the resulting apportionment should be credible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document