84: Maternal and neonatal outcomes of planned primary cesarean versus vaginal delivery for low risk primiparous women at term

2008 ◽  
Vol 199 (6) ◽  
pp. S37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Olson ◽  
Kimberly Gregory ◽  
Solange Mongoue-Tchokote ◽  
John McConnell ◽  
Cynthia Morris ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Corrao ◽  
Anna Cantarutti ◽  
Anna Locatelli ◽  
Gloria Porcu ◽  
Luca Merlino ◽  
...  

Antenatal care (ANC) aims of monitoring wellbeing of mother and foetus during pregnancy. We validate a set of indicators aimed of measuring the quality of ANC of women on low-risk, uncomplicated pregnancy through their relationship with maternal and neonatal outcomes. We conducted a population-based cohort study including 122,563 deliveries that occurred between 2015 and 2017 in the Lombardy Region, Italy. Promptness and appropriateness of number and timing of gynaecological visits, ultrasounds and laboratory tests were evaluated. We assessed several maternal and neonatal outcomes. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratio (PR), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI), for the exposure→outcome association. Compared with women who adhered with recommendations, those who were no adherent had a significant higher prevalence of maternal intensive care units admission (PR: 3.1, 95%CI: 1.2–7.9; and 2.7, 1.1–7.0 respectively for promptness of gynaecological visits, and appropriateness of ultrasound examinations), low Apgar score (1.6, 1.1–1.2; 1.9, 1.3–2.7; and 2.1, 1.5–2.8 respectively for appropriateness and promptness of gynaecological visits, and appropriateness of ultrasound examinations), and low birth weight (1.8, 1.5–2.3 for appropriateness of laboratory test examinations). Benefits for mothers and newborn are expected from improving adherence to guidelines-driven recommendations regarding antenatal care even for low-risk, uncomplicated pregnancies.


1994 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 751-752
Author(s):  
Anne W. Read ◽  
Walter J. Prendiville ◽  
Vivienne P. Dawes ◽  
Fiona J. Stanley

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Necati Hancerliogullari ◽  
Selen Yaman ◽  
Rifat Taner Aksoy ◽  
Aytekin Tokmak

Objective: To compare surgical complications and maternal and neonatal outcomes of low-risk, late preterm and term pregnant women who have had one or two previous cesarean sections (CSs) with those who have had three or more CSs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 850 patients undergoing repeat CS at a tertiary level maternity hospital in Ankara, Turkey. Of those, 380 had previously undergone one or two CSs (Group-I: second or third CS) and 470 had previously undergone three or four CSs (Group-II: fourth or fifth CS). Outcomes and complications were compared between the groups. Results: The two groups were statistically significantly different in terms of maternal age, parity, body mass index, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, and length of hospital stay (all p<0.001). Although the prevalence of intraperitoneal adhesions and placenta previa was higher in Group-II than in Group-I (p<0.001), there was no statistically significant difference in terms of cesarean hysterectomy and adjacent organ injuries (p>0.05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of neonatal outcomes (p>0.05). Conclusion: Although the increase in the number of CSs appears to be associated with intraperitoneal adhesions and placenta previa, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were not observed in those women with low-risk pregnancies who underwent CS for the fourth or fifth time. Therefore, fourth and fifth CSs may be considered relatively safe surgical procedures in this cohort. How to cite this:Hancerliogullari N, Yaman S, Aksoy RT, Tokmak A. Does an increased number of cesarean sections result in greater risk for mother and baby in low-risk, late preterm and term deliveries? Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(1):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.1.364 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang WEI ◽  
Qin-yan CAO ◽  
Li ZHANG ◽  
Yi XU ◽  
Mei-fan DUAN

Abstract Backgroud: When labour induction should be offered to women at or beyond term is unclear. This work aimed to investigate the effects of the timing of labour induction on maternal and neonatal outcomes in low-risk pregnancies. Methods: This retrospective case-control study involved low-risk primigravid pregnant mothers in whom labour was induced at 40-41+6 weeks at our two hospitals between January and December 2017. According to the gestational age at labour induction, participants were categorized into the study group (40-40+6 weeks, n=284) or to the control group (41-41+6 weeks, n=172), and maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared.Results: The study group showed significantly shorter labour in the first stage (391.8±225.7 vs. 472.0±268.9 min, P=0.006), second stage (65.41±38.66 vs. 53.73±31.58 min, P= 0.008) and total stage (453.0±235.8 vs. 535.7±259.8 min, P=0.005). The two groups showed no significant differences in the methods of labour induction or in the rates of failure of labour induction, of caesarean delivery, of postpartum haemorrhage, or of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.Conclusions: Our retrospective study suggests that inducing labour at 40-40+6 weeks does not increase the risk of adverse maternal or foetal outcomes, and that it shortens labour. These results suggest that labor induction at 40-40+6 weeks was feasible for low-risk primiparas.Trial registration: The research has been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University and Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital, China. Patients gave written informed consent for their anonymized medical data to be analyzed and published for research purposes.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana B. Hernández-López ◽  
Cristina Muriel-Miguel ◽  
Tirso Pérez-Medina ◽  
Aurora Fernández-Cañadas Morillo ◽  
Carolina López-Lapeyrere ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Effective myometrial contractility is important for successful labor, although little attention has been paid to the effect of managing intrapartum fluid intake. Ineffective myometrial contractility leads to prolonged labor, thus increasing obstetric and neonatal adverse outcomes. The risk of prolonged labor can be reduced by increasing the total volume of fluids administered during labor. Objective To determine the hydration strategies applied in nulliparous women undergoing low risk labor and their association with obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted in a Universitary Hospital. The study population included nulliparous women who presented in active labor or induced labor. Sample size was 147. In order to stratify women based on the hydration received, we set as a cut-off point the mean total volume administered per hour (300 ml/h). This enabled to compare obstetric, clinical, and neonatal outcomes in women who had received ≥ 300 mL/h o < 300 mL/h. The primary outcome was total length of labor. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results The study population comprised 148 nulliparous women, mean (DS) age 32.2 (4.4) years, mean (DS) gestational age of 39.4 (1.41) weeks. At admission, median (IQR) dilation was 2 (1–3) cm. Labor was induced in 65.5% (n = 97). Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were more favorable in women who received a ≥ 300 mL/h volume, with statistically significant median differences in the duration total duration of labor (526 vs 735 min; p < 0.001). Clinically relevant differences were also observed with respect to cesarean delivery (14.3% vs 18.7%), fever (5.5% vs 7.7%), weight loss at 24 hours (–2.3% vs − 3%) and at 48 hours (–5.7% vs − 6.3 %), incidence of weight loss > 7% at 48 hours (28.6% vs 39.8%), breastfeeding (94.6% vs 82.4%). Conclusions Higher fluid volume administered to nulliparous women during low-risk labor is associated with improved obstetric and neonatal outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document