scholarly journals Surgical outcome after standard abdominoperineal resection: A 15-year cohort study from a single cancer centre

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 83-89
Author(s):  
S. Wilkins ◽  
R. Yap ◽  
K. Loon ◽  
M. Staples ◽  
K. Oliva ◽  
...  
The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.W. Mitus ◽  
P. Blecharz ◽  
J. Jakubowicz ◽  
M. Reinfuss ◽  
T. Walasek ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. e157-e158
Author(s):  
David McGoldrick ◽  
Aghiad Yassin Alsabbagh ◽  
Laura Pettit ◽  
Moinuddin Shaikh ◽  
Sunil Bhatia

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v223
Author(s):  
A. Madi ◽  
M. Gore ◽  
M. McKay ◽  
H. Wong ◽  
G. Cave ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 620-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Marie Davies ◽  
Eugene Batuyong ◽  
Sasha M. Lupichuk ◽  
Robert Hilsden ◽  
Misha Eliasziw ◽  
...  

620 Background: The 2005 ASCO guidelines recommend surveillance testing and frequencies following surgical +/− adjuvant therapy for stage II/III CRC. In Canada, many patients are discharged from their oncologist to their primary care physician (PCP) for ongoing surveillance. However, adherence to surveillance recommendations is low. This cohort study evaluated adherence to surveillance 1 year after treatment of stage II/III CRC prior to and following implementation of a DL. Methods: Cohort 1 (C1) patients were retrospectively identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry following adjuvant therapy (as applicable) at a tertiary cancer centre (07/2006 - 09/2007). Cohort 2 (C2) patients were prospectively identified from the Registry and clinic records following adjuvant therapy (as applicable), as those discharged from the centre (10/2007 - 4/2009); DL was sent to the patient and PCP recommending surveillance tests and dates. Clinical, laboratory, diagnostic imaging, and endoscopy data was collated. Adherence at 1 year follow-up was compared between cohorts using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses. Results: C1 (n=218) was larger than C2 (n=114) despite the longer accrual time for C2. There were no differences between cohorts by age, sex, primary site of disease, stage, or adjuvant oxaliplatin use. During year 1 of follow-up, 11.8% and 11.4% recurred (local or metastatic) and 6.5% and 2.7% died (p=0.1) in C1 and C2 respectively. Comparing C1 with C2, 14.8% vs. 23.0% of patients had one CEA test within 3 months, 45.2% vs. 72.2% within 6 months, and 71.7% vs. 85.1% within 1 year (p<0.001). Only 44.0% (C1) and 68.6% (C2) had 2 CEA tests within 1 year. Only 3.9% (C1) vs. 6.6% (C2) of patients had 4 CEA tests within the year following treatment as recommended. The rate of CT imaging was 32.3% (C1) and 56.1% (C2); endoscopy was 36.7% (C1) and 42.1% (C2). Conclusions: Implementation of a DL improved compliance with surveillance at 1 year of follow-up following discharge from a tertiary cancer centre, although optimal adherence remains low. However, adherence to CT imaging nearly doubled. Evaluation of compliance at 3 years of follow-up is ongoing.


Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Quaranta ◽  
Rahul Nath ◽  
Gautam Mehra ◽  
Yasser Diab ◽  
Ahmad Sayasneh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document