scholarly journals 224P Value of bone scintigraphy in breast cancer patients staged with computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S455
Author(s):  
V.N. Evseev ◽  
E.S. Djzelyalov ◽  
R.V. Pavlov
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Nasim Khan ◽  
SM Moinul Islam ◽  
Abrar Al Sakib ◽  
Saiyeeda Mahmood ◽  
Gazi Abul Hossian ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to investigate the additional benefit of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) over whole-body planar bone scintigraphy (planar BS) and SPECT for the detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Materials & methods: Of 112 consecutively examined patients with histologically confirmed breast carcinoma who underwent bone scintigraphy, 39 required further evaluation by SPECT/CT (n= 23) and SPECT alone (n = 16) because a definite diagnosis could not be established using whole body planar BS alone. The 23 SPECT/CT studies were retrospectively evaluated by two nuclear medicine physicians for planar BS and SPECT images, and one nuclear medicine physician and one radiologist for SPECT/CT on consensus. Each focus of abnormal tracer uptake was recorded for differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions. Clinical and imaging follow-up were used as a reference standard. Results: A total of 72 lesions were evaluated in 23 patients examined by three types of imaging modalities. In 57 of the 72 evaluated lesions, the results of planar BS, SPECT and SPECT/CT were concordant; 52 of the 57 lesions were interpreted as malignant and 5 lesions as benign by all modalities. In 15 of the 72 lesions, consensus reading of fused SPECT/CT images changed the image interpretation of 15 planar BS scans and 9 of the 15 SPECT scans: 7 lesions previously interpreted as benign (on both planar BS and SPECT) were re-classified as malignant and 8 lesions (8 by planar BS and 2/8 by SPECT) previously interpreted as malignant were reevaluated as benign. The highest diagnostic gain was in the thoracolumbar spine, thoracic cage & pelvis. The overall accuracy of SPECT/CT was significantly higher on a lesion-based analysis than planar BS and SPECT (100%vs 79%, p < 0.0001 and 100% vs 83%, p = 0.003). Compared to planar BS and SPECT, the results of SPECT/CT changed diagnosis or treatment in 5/23 patients (21.7%). 39 Conclusion: The hybrid imaging system with SPECT/CT is a feasible technique yielding coregistered dual-modality images. The addition of SPECT/CT improves the diagnostic accuracy for the correct interpretation of bony lesions in breast cancer patients undergoing bone scanning for metastases. SPECT/CT should be routinely used in the work up of postoperative breast carcinoma patients with simultaneous CT evaluation to identify metastatic lesions not detected on bone scintigraphy. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjnm.v17i1.22490 Bangladesh J. Nuclear Med. 17(1): 38-49, January 2014


Author(s):  
Nils Martin Bruckmann ◽  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
Wolfgang Peter Fendler ◽  
Robert Seifert ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Da-Chuan Cheng ◽  
Te-Chun Hsieh ◽  
Kuo-Yang Yen ◽  
Chia-Hung Kao

This study aimed to explore efficient ways to diagnose bone metastasis early using bone scintigraphy images through negative mining, pre-training, the convolutional neural network, and deep learning. We studied 205 prostate cancer patients and 371 breast cancer patients and used bone scintigraphy data from breast cancer patients to pre-train a YOLO v4 with a false-positive reduction strategy. With the pre-trained model, transferred learning was applied to prostate cancer patients to build a model to detect and identify metastasis locations using bone scintigraphy. Ten-fold cross validation was conducted. The mean sensitivity and precision rates for bone metastasis location detection and classification (lesion-based) in the chests of prostate patients were 0.72 ± 0.04 and 0.90 ± 0.04, respectively. The mean sensitivity and specificity rates for bone metastasis classification (patient-based) in the chests of prostate patients were 0.94 ± 0.09 and 0.92 ± 0.09, respectively. The developed system has the potential to provide pre-diagnostic reports to aid in physicians’ final decisions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramaiah Vinay Kumar

Abstract Background: Automatic Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) based image matching for set-up verification is recommended as compared to 2-D match for post-operative local / loco-regional radiotherapy of breast cancer patients by Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique. However, in supine position, off-midline peripheral body Clinical Target Volume (CTV) of unilateral breast cancer patients immobilized on Breast and Lung board of All-in-One (AIO) positioning systemmay necessitate augmented movement of couch in ‘x’ and ‘z’ axis thereby raising the risk of collusion of x-ray sources / detectors system with couch. Methods and Materials: VMAT was planned by a pair of partial arc for whole target volume for seven consecutive post-operative breast cancer patients (five post-mastectomy and two post-breast conservation patients). Tattoo based set-up by shift of treatment table in x-, y- and z-axis as determined by Treatment Planning System followed by X-rays with planar image acquisition and online 2-D imaging matching was performed for set-up verification. In-room 360°rotation of x-ray source and detector system of linear accelerator (linac) was performed before x-ray planar image acquisition. Results: Completion of 360°rotation in-room of x-ray source and detector system of linacaround the machine iso-centre was not possible in six out of seven patients due to possibility of collusion of gantry with contralateral side of the couch. Conclusion: Performing CBCT for generating 3D images for computed tomography (CT) reconstruction may not be practical for patient set-up verification of post-operative radiotherapy of unilateral breast cancer patients positioned supine on breast and lung board.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document