Everyday discrimination as a predictor of maladaptive and adaptive eating: Findings from EAT 2018

Appetite ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 105878
Author(s):  
Cynthia Y. Yoon ◽  
Vivienne M. Hazzard ◽  
Rebecca L. Emery ◽  
Susan M. Mason ◽  
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Discrimination

scholarly journals Discrimination and Protective Factors to Cognitive Health: Testing NIA’s Health Disparities Framework

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 672-672
Author(s):  
Ernest Gonzales ◽  
Cliff Whetung ◽  
Jane Lee ◽  
Yi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Health Disparities ◽  
Protective Factors ◽  
Cognitive Functioning ◽  
Mixed Models ◽  
Ethnically Diverse ◽  
Cognitive Health ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Health Trajectories ◽  
Structural Inequities ◽  
Everyday Discrimination

Abstract Cognitive impairment is a worldwide epidemic. Informed by NIA’s Health Disparities Framework, this study investigated interpersonal, behavioral, and sociocultural risk and protective factors associated with cognitive health trajectories. Mixed models examined factors associated with cognitive health with data from the Health and Retirement Study among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics (2008-2014, N=4,511). A majority of respondents who experienced everyday discrimination attributed it to ageism among this racially and ethnically diverse sample. Stratified mixed models of everyday discrimination by attribution (racism or ageism) revealed worse cognitive functioning. Major lifetime discrimination was not statistically associated with cognitive functioning. Economic factors (education, income, assets) and religious activity protected cognitive functioning and were particularly salient for Blacks and Hispanics. Strategies that bolster individual resilience as well as social policies that address discrimination and structural inequities will likely reduce health disparities and improve population health.

scholarly journals Everyday Discrimination and Kidney Function Among Older Adults: Evidence From the Health and Retirement Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-521
Author(s):  
Ryon J Cobb ◽  
Roland J Thorpe ◽  
Keith C Norris
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Function ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health And Retirement Study ◽  
Disease Epidemiology ◽  
Lower Egfr ◽  
Everyday Discrimination ◽  
Retirement Study

Abstract Background With advancing age, there is an increase in the time of and number of experiences with psychosocial stressors that may lead to the initiation and/or progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Our study tests whether one type of experience, everyday discrimination, predicts kidney function among middle and older adults. Methods The data were from 10 973 respondents (ages 52–100) in the 2006/2008 Health and Retirement Study, an ongoing biennial nationally representative survey of older adults in the United States. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) derives from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. Our indicator of everyday discrimination is drawn from self-reports from respondents. Ordinary Least Squared regression (OLS) models with robust standard errors are applied to test hypotheses regarding the link between everyday discrimination and kidney function. Results Everyday discrimination was associated with poorer kidney function among respondents in our study. Respondents with higher everyday discrimination scores had lower eGFR after adjusting for demographic characteristics (B = −1.35, p < .05), and while attenuated, remained significant (B = −0.79, p < .05) after further adjustments for clinical, health behavior, and socioeconomic covariates. Conclusions Our study suggests everyday discrimination is independently associated with lower eGFR. These findings highlight the importance of psychosocial factors in predicting insufficiency in kidney function among middle-aged and older adults.

Everyday Discrimination and Mental Stress–Induced Myocardial Ischemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-439
Author(s):  
Izraelle I. McKinnon ◽  
Amit J. Shah ◽  
Bruno Lima ◽  
Kasra Moazzami ◽  
An Young ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Ischemia ◽  
Mental Stress ◽  
Everyday Discrimination

The Everyday Ageism Scale: Development and Evaluation

2021 ◽  
pp. 089826432110361
Author(s):  
Julie Ober Allen ◽  
Erica Solway ◽  
Matthias Kirch ◽  
Dianne Singer ◽  
Jeffrey T. Kullgren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Aging ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
National Poll ◽  
The Everyday ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Health And Well Being ◽  
Everyday Discrimination

Objectives Older adults regularly encounter age-based discrimination and stereotyping in their day-to-day lives. Whether this type of routine ageism negatively affects their health and well-being is unclear, in part due to the absence of validated scales that comprehensively measure this phenomenon and distinguish it from other sources of everyday discrimination. Methods This study describes the development of a novel scale, the Everyday Ageism Scale, and its psychometric evaluation using a nationally representative sample of US adults age 50–80 from the December 2019 National Poll on Healthy Aging ( N = 2012). Results Exploratory factor analysis indicated a 3-factor structure comprised of ageist messages, ageism in interpersonal interactions, and internalized ageism. The ten-item scale was psychometrically sound and demonstrated good internal reliability. Discussion Everyday ageism is a multidimensional construct. Preliminary evaluation of the Everyday Ageism Scale suggests its utility in future studies examining the prevalence of everyday ageism and its relationships with health.

Everyday Discrimination Scale--Modified Version

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney Clark ◽  
Apollonia P. Coleman ◽  
Jeremy D. Novak
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Discrimination

Informant-Reported Discrimination, Dementia, and Cognitive Impairment in Older Brazilians

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jose M. Farfel ◽  
Lisa L. Barnes ◽  
Ana Capuano ◽  
Maria Carolina de Moraes Sampaio ◽  
Robert S. Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Sex Education ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Racially Diverse ◽  
Clinical Dementia Rating ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Poor Cognitive Function ◽  
Diagnosis Of Dementia ◽  
Everyday Discrimination

Background: Self-reported discrimination is a source of psychosocial stress that has been previously associated with poor cognitive function in older African Americans without dementia. Objective: Here, we examine the association of discrimination with dementia and cognitive impairment in racially diverse older Brazilians. Methods: We included 899 participants 65 years or older (34.3% Black) from the Pathology, Alzheimer’s and Related Dementias Study (PARDoS), a community-based study of aging and dementia. A structured interview with informants of the deceased was conducted. The interview included the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale for the diagnosis of dementia and cognitive impairment proximate to death and the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) as a second measure of cognitive impairment. Informant-reported discrimination was assessed using modified items from the Major and Everyday Discrimination Scales. Results: Discrimination was reported by informants of 182 (20.2%) decedents and was more likely reported by informants of Blacks than Whites (25.3% versus 17.6%, p = 0.006). Using the CDR, a higher level of informant-reported discrimination was associated with higher odds of dementia (OR: 1.24, 95% CI 1.08 –1.42, p = 0.002) and cognitive impairment (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.06 –1.39, p = 0.004). Similar results were observed using the IQCODE (estimate: 0.07, SE: 0.02, p = 0.003). The effects were independent of race, sex, education, socioeconomic status, major depression, neuroticism, or comorbidities. Conclusion: Higher level of informant-reported discrimination was associated with higher odds of dementia and cognitive impairment in racially diverse older Brazilians.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document