Nuclear PKM2 expression, an independent risk factor for ER after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 1858-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fangtian Fan ◽  
Hongyan Wu ◽  
Zhaoguo Liu ◽  
Xianbang Hou ◽  
Wenxin Chen ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 12-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikuo Nakamura ◽  
Yuji Iimuro ◽  
Seikan Hai ◽  
Yuichi  Kondo ◽  
Etsuro Hatano ◽  
...  

Background: Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was recently defined with the corresponding recommendations as follows: grade A, no change in clinical management; grade B, clinical management with noninvasive treatment; and grade C, clinical management with invasive treatment. In this study, we identified the risk factors for grade B and C PHLF in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Of 339 HCC patients who underwent curative hepatic resection, 218 were included for analysis. The LHL15 index (uptake ratio of the liver to that of the liver and heart at 15 min) was measured by 99m Tc-GSA (99m technetium-labelled galactosyl human serum albumin); remnant LHL15 was calculated as LHL15 × [1 − (resected liver weight − tumor volume)/whole liver volume without tumor]. Results: A total of 163 patients were classified as having no PHLF, whereas 17, 37, and 1 patient had PHLF grade A, B, and C, respectively. There were significant differences in indocyanine green R15, serum albumin, prothrombin time, Child-Pugh classification, LHL15 and remnant LHL15 between patients with grades B/C PHLF and patients with grade A or no PHLF. Only remnant LHL15 was identified as an independent risk factor for grades B/C PHLF (p = 0.023), with a cut-off value of 0.755. Conclusions: Remnant LHL15 was an independent risk factor for grades B/C PHLF. Patients with impaired remnant LHL15 value of <0.755 should be carefully monitored for PHLF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1576-1582
Author(s):  
Jian Hu ◽  
Zhi-Qing Zhang ◽  
Wei Zhu ◽  
Zhen-Ru Wu ◽  
Yu You ◽  
...  

Abstract The difference of the patients bearing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with and without cirrhosis at clinical level has not been completely determined. This study compared their differences in clinicopathological traits and prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Animal model was established to validate the result of clinical observation. As a result, 82 patients bearing HCC with no cirrhosis (HCC-NC) and 146 patients bearing HCC with cirrhosis (HCC-C) were included. HCC-NC exhibited shorter prothrombin time and higher plasma albumin than HCC-C. In HCC-NC, satellite nodule was an independent risk factor for OS, and high γ-glutamyl transpeptidase was an independent risk factor for RFS. In HCC-C, female sex was an independent risk factor for OS. Stratified analysis showed the OS and RFS of HCC-NC were better than HCC-C in conditions like without cancer embolus (in the portal vein or bile duct), without lymphadenopathy in hepatic portal, without satellite nodule and with small or high-differentiated tumor. Animal model analysis showed HCC-NC had a higher liver/body weight ratio, less tumor count and smaller max tumor volume than HCC-C. In conclusion, clinicopathological traits and risk factors influencing postoperative OS and RFS differed between patients with HCC-C and HCC-NC.


2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. 1430-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
W-P Koh ◽  
K Robien ◽  
R Wang ◽  
S Govindarajan ◽  
J-M Yuan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document