Effect of corn preparation methods on dry-grind ethanol production by granular starch hydrolysis and partitioning of spent beer solids

2011 ◽  
Vol 102 (12) ◽  
pp. 6680-6686 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.P. Lamsal ◽  
H. Wang ◽  
L.A. Johnson
2009 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 448-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo C. Vidal ◽  
Kent D. Rausch ◽  
Mike E. Tumbleson ◽  
Vijay Singh

Fuel ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo A. Cinelli ◽  
Jimmy A. López ◽  
Leda R. Castilho ◽  
Denise M.G. Freire ◽  
Aline M. Castro

2012 ◽  
Vol 290 (15) ◽  
pp. 1481-1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Uthumporn ◽  
Y. N. Shariffa ◽  
A. Fazilah ◽  
A. A. Karim

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morakot Krajang ◽  
Kwanruthai Malairuang ◽  
Jatuporn Sukna ◽  
Krongchan Rattanapradit ◽  
Saethawat Chamsart

Abstract Background A single-step ethanol production is the combination of raw cassava starch hydrolysis and fermentation. For the development of raw starch consolidated bioprocessing technologies, this research was to investigate the optimum conditions and technical procedures for the production of ethanol from raw cassava starch in a single step. It successfully resulted in high yields and productivities of all the experiments from the laboratory, the pilot, through the industrial scales. Yields of ethanol concentration are comparable with those in the commercial industries that use molasses and hydrolyzed starch as the raw materials. Results Before single-step ethanol production, studies of raw cassava starch hydrolysis by a granular starch hydrolyzing enzyme, StargenTM002, were carefully conducted. It successfully converted 80.19% (w/v) of raw cassava starch to glucose at a concentration of 176.41 g/L with a productivity at 2.45 g/L/h when it was pretreated at 60 °C for 1 h with 0.10% (v/w dry starch basis) of Distillase ASP before hydrolysis. The single-step ethanol production at 34 °C in a 5-L fermenter showed that Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Fali, active dry yeast) produced the maximum ethanol concentration, pmax at 81.86 g/L (10.37% v/v) with a yield coefficient, Yp/s of 0.43 g/g, a productivity or production rate, rp at 1.14 g/L/h and an efficiency, Ef of 75.29%. Scale-up experiments of the single-step ethanol production using this method, from the 5-L fermenter to the 200-L fermenter and further to the 3000-L industrial fermenter were successfully achieved with essentially good results. The values of pmax,Yp/s, rp, and Ef of the 200-L scale were at 80.85 g/L (10.25% v/v), 0.42 g/g, 1.12 g/L/h and 74.40%, respectively, and those of the 3000-L scale were at 70.74 g/L (8.97% v/v), 0.38 g/g, 0.98 g/L/h and 67.56%, respectively. Because of using raw starch, major by-products, i.e., glycerol, lactic acid, and acetic acid of all three scales were very low, in ranges of 0.940–1.140, 0.046–0.052, 0.000–0.059 (% w/v), respectively, where are less than those values in the industries. Conclusion The single-step ethanol production using the combination of raw cassava starch hydrolysis and fermentation of three fermentation scales in this study is practicable and feasible for the scale-up of industrial production of ethanol from raw starch.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping Wang ◽  
Vijay Singh ◽  
David B. Johnston ◽  
Kent D. Rausch ◽  
M.E. Tumbleson
Keyword(s):  

Processes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurambhatti ◽  
Kumar ◽  
Singh

Use of corn fractionation techniques in dry grind process increases the number of coproducts, enhances their quality and value, generates feedstock for cellulosic ethanol production and potentially increases profitability of the dry grind process. The aim of this study is to develop process simulation models for eight different wet and dry corn fractionation techniques recovering germ, pericarp fiber and/or endosperm fiber, and evaluate their techno-economic feasibility at the commercial scale. Ethanol yields for plants processing 1113.11 MT corn/day were 37.2 to 40 million gal for wet fractionation and 37.3 to 31.3 million gal for dry fractionation, compared to 40.2 million gal for conventional dry grind process. Capital costs were higher for wet fractionation processes ($92.85 to $97.38 million) in comparison to conventional ($83.95 million) and dry fractionation ($83.35 to $84.91 million) processes. Due to high value of coproducts, ethanol production costs in most fractionation processes ($1.29 to $1.35/gal) were lower than conventional ($1.36/gal) process. Internal rate of return for most of the wet (6.88 to 8.58%) and dry fractionation (6.45 to 7.04%) processes was higher than the conventional (6.39%) process. Wet fractionation process designed for germ and pericarp fiber recovery was most profitable among the processes.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaorong Wu ◽  
Yijun Sang ◽  
Renyong Zhao ◽  
Paul A Seib ◽  
Yongcheng Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document