The role of functional polymorphisms of the TNF-α gene promoter in the risk of ischemic stroke in Chinese Han and Uyghur populations: Two case–control studies

2010 ◽  
Vol 411 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 1291-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeqing Tong ◽  
Yijie Geng ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
Zhihong Wang ◽  
Yanwei Zhang ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Li Shi ◽  
Bing He ◽  
Jian-Jun Wang ◽  
Li-Ping Zou

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cerceo ◽  
Ebbing Lautenbach ◽  
Darren R. Linkin ◽  
Warren B. Bilker ◽  
Ingi Lee

Of 57 case-control studies of antimicrobial resistance, matching was used in 23 (40%). Matched variables differed substantially across studies. Of these 23 matched case-control studies, 12 (52%) justified the use of matching, and 9 (39%) noted the strengths or limitations of this approach. Analysis that accounted for matching was performed in only 52% of the case-control studies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhyun Song ◽  
Won Taek Lee ◽  
Kyung Ah Park ◽  
Jong Eun Lee

Vascular dementia is caused by various factors, including increased age, diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and stroke. Adiponectin is an adipokine secreted by adipose tissue. Adiponectin is widely known as a regulating factor related to cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Adiponectin plasma levels decrease with age. Decreased adiponectin increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Adiponectin improves hypertension and atherosclerosis by acting as a vasodilator and antiatherogenic factor. Moreover, adiponectin is involved in cognitive dysfunction via modulation of insulin signal transduction in the brain. Case-control studies demonstrate the association between low adiponectin and increased risk of stroke, hypertension, and diabetes. This review summarizes the recent findings on the association between risk factors for vascular dementia and adiponectin. To emphasize this relationship, we will discuss the importance of research regarding the role of adiponectin in vascular dementia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 703-714
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Gao ◽  
Mei Yin ◽  
Pei Yang ◽  
Xia Li ◽  
Lingling Di ◽  
...  

Background Controversies persist regarding whether exposure to cat or dog increases the risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis. Objective This meta-analysis aimed to assess the associations between exposure to cats or dogs and the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis. Methods A systematic review was performed to identify case-control and cohort studies before May 2019, evaluating the association between exposure to cats and dogs and the risk of asthma and rhinitis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RRs) were pooled for case-control and cohort studies, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed on prespecified study-level characteristics. Results The meta-analysis of 34 cohort studies showed a protective role of exposure to cats [RR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77–0.99] or dogs (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.97) in the development of asthma. The subgroup analysis of birth cohort (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56–0.93) and children population (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70–0.96) also suggested a favorable role of exposure to dogs in the development of asthma. Pooled evidence from 13 case-control studies indicated no significant impact of cats (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.39–2.94) and dogs (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.92–1.52) on the development of asthma. A pooled analysis of five cohort studies showed a favorable effect of exposure to cats (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.33–0.86) or dogs (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–0.90) on the development of allergic rhinitis. Conclusion The findings indicated a protective effect of exposure to cats and dogs, especially ownership, on the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. vii16-vii17
Author(s):  
K. Guleria ◽  
V. Sambyal ◽  
R. Kapahi ◽  
M. Manjari ◽  
M. Sudan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Xhevat Lumi ◽  
Mateja M. Jelen ◽  
Daša Jevšinek Skok ◽  
Emanuela Boštjančič ◽  
Metka Ravnik-Glavač ◽  
...  

The present study investigated the distribution of genotypes within single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes, related to PVR pathogenesis across European subpopulations. Genotype distributions of 42 SNPs among 96 Slovenian healthy controls were investigated and compared to genotype frequencies in 503 European individuals (Ensembl database) and their subpopulations. Furthermore, a case-control status was simulated to evaluate effects of allele frequency changes on statistically significant results in gene-association studies investigating functional polymorphisms. In addition, 96 healthy controls were investigated within 4 SNPs: rs17561 (IL1A), rs2069763 (IL2), rs2229094 (LTA), and rs1800629 (TNF) in comparison to PVR patients. Significant differences (P<0.05) in distribution of genotypes among 96 Slovenian participants and a European population were found in 10 SNPs: rs3024498 (IL10), rs315952 (IL1RN), rs2256965 (LST1), rs2256974 (LST1), rs909253 (LTA), rs2857602 (LTA), rs3138045 (NFKB1A), rs3138056 (NFKB1A), rs7656613 (PDGFRA), and rs1891467 (TGFB2), which additionally showed significant differences in genotype distribution among European subpopulations. This analysis also showed statistically significant differences in genotype distributions between healthy controls and PVR patients in rs17561 of the IL1A gene (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 0.77–11.75; P=0.036) and in rs1800629 of the TNF gene (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27–0.87; P=0.014). Furthermore, we have shown that a small change (0.02) in minor allele frequency (MAF) significantly affects the statistical p value in case-control studies. In conclusion, the study showed differences in genotype distributions in healthy populations across different European countries. Differences in distribution of genotypes may have had influenced failed replication results in previous PVR-related SNP-association studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document