Identifying causal variants at the interferon lambda locus in case-control studies: Utilizing non-synonymous variant rs117648444 to probe the role of IFN-λ4

Gene ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 664 ◽  
pp. 168-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Bhushan ◽  
Sreedhar Chinnaswamy
Keyword(s):  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Interferon Lambda ◽  
Causal Variants ◽  
Synonymous Variant

scholarly journals Role of Matching in Case-Control Studies of Antimicrobial Resistance

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cerceo ◽  
Ebbing Lautenbach ◽  
Darren R. Linkin ◽  
Warren B. Bilker ◽  
Ingi Lee
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Matched Case

Of 57 case-control studies of antimicrobial resistance, matching was used in 23 (40%). Matched variables differed substantially across studies. Of these 23 matched case-control studies, 12 (52%) justified the use of matching, and 9 (39%) noted the strengths or limitations of this approach. Analysis that accounted for matching was performed in only 52% of the case-control studies.

scholarly journals Association between Risk Factors for Vascular Dementia and Adiponectin

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhyun Song ◽  
Won Taek Lee ◽  
Kyung Ah Park ◽  
Jong Eun Lee
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Vascular Dementia ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Insulin Signal Transduction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Brain

Vascular dementia is caused by various factors, including increased age, diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and stroke. Adiponectin is an adipokine secreted by adipose tissue. Adiponectin is widely known as a regulating factor related to cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Adiponectin plasma levels decrease with age. Decreased adiponectin increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Adiponectin improves hypertension and atherosclerosis by acting as a vasodilator and antiatherogenic factor. Moreover, adiponectin is involved in cognitive dysfunction via modulation of insulin signal transduction in the brain. Case-control studies demonstrate the association between low adiponectin and increased risk of stroke, hypertension, and diabetes. This review summarizes the recent findings on the association between risk factors for vascular dementia and adiponectin. To emphasize this relationship, we will discuss the importance of research regarding the role of adiponectin in vascular dementia.

Effect of Exposure to Cats and Dogs on the Risk of Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 703-714
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Gao ◽  
Mei Yin ◽  
Pei Yang ◽  
Xia Li ◽  
Lingling Di ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Favorable Effect ◽  
Case Control Studies

Background Controversies persist regarding whether exposure to cat or dog increases the risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis. Objective This meta-analysis aimed to assess the associations between exposure to cats or dogs and the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis. Methods A systematic review was performed to identify case-control and cohort studies before May 2019, evaluating the association between exposure to cats and dogs and the risk of asthma and rhinitis. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. The odds ratios (ORs) and risk ratios (RRs) were pooled for case-control and cohort studies, respectively. Subgroup analyses were performed on prespecified study-level characteristics. Results The meta-analysis of 34 cohort studies showed a protective role of exposure to cats [RR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77–0.99] or dogs (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73–0.97) in the development of asthma. The subgroup analysis of birth cohort (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56–0.93) and children population (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70–0.96) also suggested a favorable role of exposure to dogs in the development of asthma. Pooled evidence from 13 case-control studies indicated no significant impact of cats (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.39–2.94) and dogs (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.92–1.52) on the development of asthma. A pooled analysis of five cohort studies showed a favorable effect of exposure to cats (RR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.33–0.86) or dogs (RR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–0.90) on the development of allergic rhinitis. Conclusion The findings indicated a protective effect of exposure to cats and dogs, especially ownership, on the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis.

Epstein–Barr virus and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (24) ◽  
pp. 2873-2885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Farahmand ◽  
Seyed Hamidreza Monavari ◽  
Zabihollah Shoja ◽  
Hadi Ghaffari ◽  
Mehdi Tavakoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Ebv Infection ◽  
Epstein Barr

Despite the numerous publications regarding the role of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in breast cancer development, the topic has still remained controversial. The aim of the meta-analysis was to estimate the overall prevalence of EBV in the breast cancer population, and to investigate the association between EBV and breast cancer risk. The overall prevalence of EBV was calculated 26.37% (95% CI: 22–31%) from the 44 included studies. Meta-analysis of 30 case–control studies showed that the pooled association between EBV and risk of breast cancer is odds ratio 4.74 (95% CI: 2.92–7.69; Z = 6.30; p < 0.0001). Our analyses indicate a strong statistical relationship between EBV infection and risk of breast cancer, suggesting a potential role of EBV infection in the development of breast cancer.

Evidence Hierarchy

2020 ◽  
pp. 61-77
Author(s):  
Julie Sin
Keyword(s):  
Case Control ◽  
Weight Of Evidence ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Cause And Effect ◽  
Making Sense ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
Basic Concepts ◽  
The Many ◽  
Study Designs

This chapter is about making sense of evidence from research studies from a commissioner and evidence-user perspective. A basic evidence hierarchy is described for general orientation to the concept that some study designs are more reliable than others in attempting to understand cause and effect, and there is orientation to the main study types in the hierarchy (randomized trials, cohort and case-control studies, etc.) Clearly it is the overall weight of evidence for a particular course of action that is important, although familiarity with basic concepts of study robustness remains useful in itself for making sense of the many items of evidence that present in everyday practice. The value of evidence from studies addressing non cause and effect type questions (for example seeking understanding about behaviours and beliefs) is discussed. The role of the evidence-user in making use of these concepts and enabling evidence informed practice is also described.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document