The effectiveness and patient acceptability of dietitian-led group education in the dietary and lifestyle management of gestational diabetes

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 260
Author(s):  
A. Twomey ◽  
L. Goff ◽  
A. Prince ◽  
N. Donnelly
2017 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Alayoub ◽  
S. Curran ◽  
M. Coffey ◽  
M. Hatunic ◽  
M. Higgins

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caro Minschart ◽  
Kelly Amuli ◽  
Anouk Delameillieure ◽  
Peggy Calewaert ◽  
Chantal Mathieu ◽  
...  

The value of diabetes education, focusing on lifestyle measures, in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is acknowledged, but requires intensive education and input of resources if done on an individual basis. Group education could be a valuable alternative to individual education. This study aims to investigate the impact of multidisciplinary group education on women’s knowledge about GDM, education, treatment satisfaction, and emotional status. Two hundred women with GDM were enrolled in a prospective observational study. Dutch speaking women were offered group education at their first visit after GDM diagnosis. Non-Dutch speaking women or women for whom group education was not possible received individual education. Individual follow-up with a dietitian was planned within two weeks for all women. Women receiving individual education (n = 100) were more often from an ethnic minority background compared to women in group education (n = 100) (32.0% (n = 31) vs. 15.3% (n = 15), p = 0.01). Knowledge about GDM significantly improved after education, with few differences between the two education settings. Both patients in group and individual education were equally satisfied with the content and duration of the initial and follow-up education. Of all group participants, 91.8% (n = 90) were satisfied with group size (on average three participants) and 76.5% (n = 75) found that group education fulfilled their expectations. In conclusion, women diagnosed with GDM were overall satisfied with the education session’s content leading to a better understanding of their condition, independent of the education setting. Group education is a valuable alternative to better manage the increasing workload and is perceived as an added value by GDM patients.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e045503
Author(s):  
Tingting Xu ◽  
Xiaozhen Lai ◽  
Kun He ◽  
Liangkun Ma ◽  
Hai Fang

IntroductionGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has become an increasing health problem among pregnant women in western rural China. Insufficient compliance and motivation due to economic factors is one of the major contributors to the currently low GDM screening and management rate. A subsidy program offering GDM screening and lifestyle management might be an effective way to increase pregnant women’s awareness of GDM, and further improve maternal and neonatal health in western rural China. This study had two primary purposes: (1) to examine whether the subsidy program would increase the screening and management rates of GDM and reduce adverse complications for mothers and new-born babies and (2) to evaluate whether the subsidy program is cost-effective from a societal perspective.Methods and analysisThis randomised controlled trial will include 3000 pregnant women (at 24–28 weeks of pregnancy) who will be followed up at six hospitals in the provinces of Yunnan, Sichuan and Shaanxi in China. Pregnant women without overt diabetes, with a singleton pregnancy, with telephone access and with written informed consent will be invited. The intervention group will receive subsidies and standard care, and the control group will only receive usual antenatal care. The randomisation sequence will be stratified by study sites with balanced blocks of six patients. Data will be collected using self-report questionnaires and hospital records. Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcomes are the maternal and neonatal complications. Secondary outcomes are the mother’s cognition scores, screening rate, number of re-examinations, weight gain during pregnancy, changes in diet and exercise, and quality of life. Group comparisons will be conducted using χ2 test for categorical variables, and t-test or the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test for continuous variables where applicable. Multiple logistic regression will also be performed for the primary outcomes.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Peking University Health Science Center. Findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, seminars and national and international conferences.Trial registration numberChiCTR1800017488.


The author, who has type 2 diabetes (T2D) for 26 years, conducted his diabetes research over the past 11 years. Since 2020, he has published 400+ medical research papers in various medical journals. Recently, he received invitations to submit his medical research notes to a gynecology journal but he hesitated because he was not a gynecologist. However, the editor convinced him that his research results may be beneficial to some patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) since diabetes conditions are quite similar, if not the same. Therefore, he started to review some medical papers online on the subject of gestational diabetes. Finally, he uncovered that his research results could indeed benefit some GDM patients to some degree and decided to write this summary note. Although his research specialties are in the areas of endocrinology, diabetes, and lifestyle, after 11 years of dedicated medical research with additional self-studying on GDM, he discovered that approximately 90% of his diabetes research findings are applicable to this special group. In summary, three areas with special emphasis are highlighted for GDM patients. The first and major area is food nutrition in a lifestyle management program. Due to the concerns of hyperglycemia, the author eats high-quality protein, a lot of fish and vegetables, particularly green leafy vegetables, portioncontrolled shellfish and fruits, along with avoidance of red meat and sweetened food. However, for a GDM patient, he highly recommends them to follow a “nutritional balanced” meal plan, avoiding high-carbs, sugar-based, and processed food in general to prevent unhealthy chemical additives. The fetus in utero needs good nutrition supplied by its mother; therefore, the mother must eat nutritional balanced meals that meet nutritional requirements and glucose concerns. The second area is specific weight-gain management. The author focuses on the food portion percentage with a strong willpower to resist his food cravings plus persistence each day, so that he can achieve his weight reduction target. However, for a GDM patient, she must constantly monitor the amount of weight gained according to the Mayo Clinic’s “weight-gain guidelines”. Maintenance in this area is important for the benefit of the baby’s development and mother’s health during pregnancy. However, both of his food portion percentage and persistent weight control are good examples to follow and useful for a GDM patient. The third area is medication treatment for gestational diabetes. Although the author ceased taking medications in controlling his diabetes symptoms, he decided to implement a rather stringent lifestyle management program in order to control or even reverse his diabetes conditions at the root-cause level. Nevertheless, it is a difficult route that takes a longer time span to be able to see significant improvements. Since the pregnancy period is relatively shorter, less than 10 months, a gestational diabetes patient must follow her physician’s advice to pursue all the necessary medication treatments or insulin injections. The information in particular the high correlation coefficients between any two variables, from Figures 2 through 5, provide useful knowledge for a GDM patient to learn in order to control her glucose levels during pregnancy. The most important goal is the safe delivery of a healthy new born


2016 ◽  
Vol 214 (1) ◽  
pp. S92-S93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Workineh G. Tadesse ◽  
Fiona Dunlevy ◽  
Syeda F. Nazir ◽  
H. Doherty ◽  
M.J. Turner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document