A Lifestyle Management for Arthritis Group education intervention for people with inflammatory and degenerative arthritis: An observational study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Brownlee ◽  
Emer Sheridan ◽  
Aoife Synnott ◽  
Aoife McCormack ◽  
Mary Bell ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Nurleny Nurleny

ABSTRACT WHO (2008), put Indonesia 4.8% as the country with the third highest number of smokers in the world after China as much as 30% and India as much as 11.2%. Smokers in Indonesia on average start smoking at the age of 15-19 years, which at age is the age of adolescents. One effort to provide information about the dangers of smoking in adolescents is through peers ( peer group). The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Peer Group Education on smoking behavior in adolescents at SMK TAMAN SISWA Padang in 2018. The research type is pre-experiment with One-Group Pre-Test-Post-Test approach implemented in SMK Taman Siswa Padang in December 2017 until May 2018. The population is class X and class XI total of 60 people where class X there are 25 students and class XI 35 student at SMP Taman Siswa Padang with sample amounted to 24 students. Univariate data analysis with frequency distribution and bivariate analysis with paired sample t-test with a confidence level of 95%.  Results showed average knowledge teenager before getting peer group education intervention was 6.21, after getting peer group education intervention was 14.54, average adolescent attitude before getting peer group education intervention is 34.88, after getting peer group education intervention was 52.25, the average teenage action before getting peer group education intervention was 3.33 and after obtaining peer group education intervention was 8.12 . It can be concluded differences in knowledge, attitude and practice about smoking before and after getting peer group education intervention. Suggestion for school parties needs to work with local health agencies to conduct cooperation in the form of health education to students, especially about the dangers of smoking for students. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 142-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Randle ◽  
Antony Arthur ◽  
Natalie Vaughan ◽  
Heather Wharrad ◽  
Richard Windle

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erna Irawan ◽  
Hudzaifah Alfatih ◽  
Faisal .

Background: The number of people with diabetes mellitus is increasing with the most cases being Type II Diabetes Mellitus which is a chronic condition and if not treated seriously can cause complications such as kidney disease, amputation and blindness. Families play an important role in prevention and help deal with patients’ disease problems. One of the factorsthat influence the health of DM patientsis family support. It has a significant influence on the success of diabetes management. The most influential factor for family support is health knowledge and education. Peer education intervention group is one type of health education that provides increased knowledge, psychosocial, and more effective expenditure, rather than personal counseling. Family as a function of health that requires peers from their own family members.  Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify the effectiveness of the peer group Educationin tervention family against the family support of type II DM patients. Methods: The designused in this study included the randomized pretest and -posttest control group design. Sampling was done by purposive sampling with family inclusion criteria in which one family member suffered from type II DM, stayed with the patient, and was willing to become a respondent. Data collection is using family support questionnaire. Data analysis used a t-test. Results: The results showed there were significant differences between pre and post intervention. The peer group education intervention increased the family support of type II DM patients after the post intervention (p = 0.00). the peer group education intervention family increases the family support of type II DM patients in the intervention group compared to controls (p =0.00). Conclusion: The results showed that peer group intervention education was more significant than health education usually in increasing the family support of diabetes mellitus patients,so that it could be used as an intervention choice for community nurses in increasing family support for DM patients.    


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Craig Uejo ◽  
Stephen Demeter

Abstract In the AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, distal clavicle resection (resection arthroplasty of the acromioclavicular joint [ACJ]) results in ratable impairment, but only a single diagnosis within a region may be rated. Therefore, if another impairing condition is present in the shoulder region (eg, impingement syndrome or rotator cuff disease) only that resulting in the greatest causally related impairment is rated. In the setting of an occupational or other compensable injury or illness, causation of the impairment often is a key issue because, typically, only impairment that is causally related to the injury can be rated. For example, assume that a lifting injury at work caused a tear in a rotator cuff tendon that was already attenuated by repetitive impingement on inferiorly projecting spurs from longstanding degenerative arthritis of the ACJ. If surgery was performed for a traumatic rotator cuff tear and the distal clavicle also was resected due to preexisting ACJ arthritis, the latter surgery is not considered to be related to the injury. In other words, because the ACJ arthritis was neither caused nor worsened by the injury, this condition is not rated. The distal clavicular resection may have been warranted to diminish pain due to ACJ arthritis and/or eliminate the distal clavicle as a source of impingement.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles N. Brooks ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract Meniscal tears and osteoarthritis (osteoarthrosis, degenerative arthritis, or degenerative joint disease) are two of the most common conditions involving the knee. This article includes definitions of apportionment and causes; presents a case report of initial and recurrent tears of the medial meniscus plus osteoarthritis (OA) in the medial compartment of the knee; and addresses questions regarding apportionment. The authors, experienced impairment raters who are knowledgeable regarding the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), show that, when instructions on impairment rating are incomplete, unclear, or inconsistent, interrater reliability diminishes (different physicians may derive different impairment estimates). Accurate apportionment of impairment is a demanding task that requires detailed knowledge of causation for the conditions in question; the mechanisms of injury or extent of exposures; prior and current symptoms, functional status, physical findings, and clinical study results; and use of the appropriate edition of the AMA Guides. Sometimes the available data are incomplete, requiring the rating physician to make assumptions. However, if those assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the medical literature and facts of the case, if the causation analysis is plausible, and if the examiner follows impairment rating instructions in the AMA Guides (or at least uses a rational and hence defensible method when instructions are suboptimal), the resulting apportionment should be credible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document