Treatment of stage IV colorectal carcinoma in elderly patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Maria Pasetto ◽  
Tamberi Stefano ◽  
Elena Rossi ◽  
Myriam Katya Paris ◽  
Silvio Monfardini
Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. e13956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Włodzimierz Otto ◽  
Finlay Macrae ◽  
Janusz Sierdziński ◽  
Justyna Smaga ◽  
Maria Król ◽  
...  

BMC Urology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher S. Hollenbeak ◽  
Eric W. Schaefer ◽  
Justin Doan ◽  
Jay D. Raman

Abstract Background Advances in systemic targeted therapies afford treatment opportunities in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Elderly patients with metastatic RCC present a subpopulation for consideration owing to competing causes of mortality and benefits seen with new therapeutic agents. We investigate treatment patterns for elderly patients with stage IV RCC and determine factors associated with not receiving treatment. Methods The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Medicare linked data set contained 949 stage IV RCC patients over age 65 diagnosed between 2007 and 2011. Treatment approach was modeled using multinomial logistic regression. Landmark analysis at 6 months accounted for early death as a potential explanation for no treatment. Results Of the 949 patients with stage IV RCC, 26.2% received surgery and 34.1% received systemic therapy within 6 months of diagnosis. Among our entire cohort, over half (51.2%) had no evidence of receiving surgery or systemic therapy. Among the 447 patients who survived at least 6 months, 26.6% did not receive treatment during this time. Older patients and those with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) had lower odds of being treated with surgery, systemic therapy, or both. Conversely, married patients had higher odds of receiving these therapies. These associations were largely sustained in the 6-month landmark analyses. Conclusions Elderly patients with metastatic RCC present a unique subpopulation for consideration owing to competing causes of mortality. Many elderly patients with stage IV RCC did not receive surgery or systemic therapy up to 6 months from diagnosis. Several clinical and demographic factors were associated with this observation. Further investigation is needed to understand the rationale underlying the underutilization of systemic therapy in elderly patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. e294-e299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel T. Raab ◽  
Aijing Lin ◽  
Grace Clarke Hillyer ◽  
Deborah Keller ◽  
Daniel S. O’Neil ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4663-4663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Anaclerico ◽  
Velia Bongarzoni ◽  
Anna Chierichini ◽  
Maurizio Bartolini ◽  
Piero Iacovino ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: CNS involvement in acute lymphoblastic leukemia/AUL is a well-recognized event and CNS prophylaxis is considered mandatory. In NHL, meningeal relapse occurs more rarely, ranging from 4–14% depending on histology, anatomical location and biological parameters. Flow cytometric analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), however, detected occult lymphomatous meningitis in 22% of NHL cases at risk at diagnosis (Hegde et al. Blood2005;105:496). CNS prophylaxis is currently recommended only in high-risk disease (stage IV/high IPI score) and in patients with extranodal NHL. Sustained-release liposomal cytarabine (DepoCyte®), which is licensed for meningeal relapse in NHL, has proved effective in treating lymphomatous and leukemic meningitis (Glantz et al. J Clin Oncol1999;17:3110; Sancho et al. Haematologica2006;91:ECR02). Intrathecal (IT) liposomal cytarabine is distributed throughout the CSF and has an extended half-life, allowing administration once every 2–4 weeks (Chamberlain et al. Arch Neurol1995;52:912). We therefore tested the efficacy of liposomal cytarabine in CNS prophylaxis for elderly patients with aggressive NHL or AUL, with the aim of testing the safety of IT treatment in elderly patients and the efficacy of liposomal cytarabine in preventing lymphoma/leukemia CNS relapse. Methods: From June to November 2005, 4 patients > 70 years of age entered the study. Diagnoses were: 2 stage IV, IPI 3, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); 1 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and 1 AUL; 2 patients had extranodal bulky disease (1 psoas muscle, 1 retro-orbital plus paranasal sinus involvement). As first-line treatment, the 3 NHL cases were given R-CHOP every 21 days for 6 cycles. The patient with AUL received conventional 3-drug induction (vincristine/idarubicine/prednisone) every week for 3 weeks, followed by 3 courses of L-VAMP (vincristine/cytarabine/intermediate-dose methotrexate/leucovorin rescue) and then conventional maintenance (6-mercaptopurine/methotrexate and monthly re-induction with vincristine/prednisone). All patients received CNS prophylaxis with IT liposomal cytarabine 50 mg followed by systemic steroid injection. In NHL cases, IT therapy was given the day before systemic chemotherapy for a total of 4 administrations; in AUL, prophylaxis was given every 4 weeks during induction and maintenance for a total of 6 doses. Results: Three (2 NHL and 1 AUL) patients achieved a complete response (CR) and 1 (NHL) achieved a partial response, with response durations of 4, 5, 6+ and 8+ months, respectively. As of July 2006, after a median follow-up of 10 months (range 9–12), all patients were alive; 2 (1 DLBCL, 1 AUL) were in continuous CR, and 2 (1 DLBCL, 1 MCL) had progressive disease and were receiving second-line treatment. Isolated relapse of leukemia/lymphoma in the CNS was not seen. Liposomal cytarabine was well tolerated; no drug-related side effects or hematological toxicities were recorded. Conclusions: As occult CNS involvement has been shown to occur in >20% of newly diagnosed patients with high-risk NHL, flow cytometry and cytospin analysis of CSF at diagnosis should be implemented in order to adequately target CNS prophylaxis. Liposomal cytarabine should be the drug of choice for CNS prophylaxis, particularly in elderly patients.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4448-4448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Guariglia ◽  
Giuseppe Pietrantuono ◽  
Oreste Villani ◽  
Maria Carmen Martorelli ◽  
Fiorella D’Auria ◽  
...  

Abstract Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is recognized as a distinct clinico-pathologic entity, accounting for 3–10% of all non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, with median overall survival not exceeding 3–4 years. Patients with MCL are typically older adults with a male predominance and usually present with stage IV disease. The neoplastic cells are characterized as CD20+ CD5+ CD23−, with a t(11;14)(q13;q32) and cyclin D1 overexpression on immunohistochemistry. The current, most diffused regimens for the treatment of MCL include either R-CHOP or R-HyperCVAD, followed by autologous stem cell transplantation or observation, depending on the patient’s eligibility. However, considering that MCL is frequently diagnosed in elderly subjects with relevant co-morbidities, high dose chemotherapy or the use of drugs with potential cardiotoxicity, such as anthracyclines, may result not feasible in a significant proportion of patients. In this setting, recent data suggest that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is well tolerated and has significant single-agent activity in patients with MCL. Thus, we evaluated safety and efficacy of the RBC regimen, a 21-day cycle, anthracycline-free combination of rituximab (375 mg/m(2) on day 1), bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)/d given as a double, three-hour infusion on days 1–3) in “true” (≥ 75 year-old) elderly patients with advanced MCL. Diagnosis was made according to standard histological, phenotypic and molecular criteria. The results of an early analysis on feasibility in the first six patients enrolled (3 male, 3 female) are reported here. Mean age was 79.8 years (range 75–84). All patients had stage IV disease, evidencing extranodal localizations (n. 2) or marrow/leukemic involvement (n. 4). IPI score was 2 in three patients, 3 in two patients and 4 in one patient. Three patients received RBC as first line therapy, the others were treated at relapse after (R)-CHOP- like regimens. Hematological toxicities consisted in grade 1 (n. 2) and grade 2 (n. 1) thrombocytopenia, while one patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia, requiring G-CSF support. No extra-hematological toxicities higher than grade 1 were observed. Full doses of RBC were constantly administered. One patient, who presented with a WBC count > 200.000/μl, died during the first cycle due to progressive disease; another patient showed an initial response in extranodal sites and then progressed before the fourth planned cycle. The remaining four patients received six cycles: one patient achieved a partial response and three obtained a complete response, one of whom showing a molecular remission using PCR for t(11;14) bcl-1/IgH determination. All responders (66.6%) maintain their remission phase 7–10 months after the start of RBC treatment. Although very preliminary, these results indicate that RBC regimen is feasible, well tolerated and may be effective (including the possibility to obtain molecular response) in very elderly patients with advanced MCL. Larger and more mature data will be presented at the Meeting.


Author(s):  
Rolof G.P. Gijtenbeek ◽  
Gea Helfrich ◽  
Ben J.W. Venmans ◽  
Anneke Ten Brinke ◽  
Kim De Jong ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 657-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley James D'Silva ◽  
Efrat Dotan ◽  
Dwight D. Kloth ◽  
Andrew Beck ◽  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
...  

657 Background: Limited data are available regarding the tolerance of older mCRC patients to anti-EGFR therapy. To evaluate the treatment patterns and tolerability of cetuximab/panitumumab in this patient population, we conducted a retrospective review of elderly patients treated with these agents at Fox Chase Cancer Center between 2004-2010. Methods: Patients ≥ age 65 with mCRC treated with cetuximab/panitumumab were included in the analysis. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment drugs and duration, KRAS status and overall survival were recorded. Toxicity evaluation included review of common hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities seen with these agents. Results: 118 patients were included; 100 received cetuximab and 18 received panitumumab therapy. The majority of patients were male (59.3%) with colon cancer (82.2%) and stage IV disease at presentation (50.8%). The median age at treatment initiation was 73 yrs (range: 65-90). Median overall survival was 510 days, and the median time on treatment 73 days. Most patients were treated prior to the incorporation of routine KRAS testing thus, KRAS status was available for 35 patients (29.7%) with 14.2% KRAS mutant tumors. 66% of cetuximab and 45% of panitumumab treatments were given in combination with another agent. The overall incidence of any grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity was 36% (34% for single agent; 37.8% for combination therapy). Common grade 3/4 non-heme toxicities were: hypomagnesemia-16.9%, diarrhea-10.2%, and rash-9.3%. Diarrhea and hypomagnesemia were more common among patients receiving combination therapy. The overall incidence of any grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was 15.2% (6.8% for single agent ; 20.3% for combination therapy). Anemia was the most common heme toxicity in both single and combination therapy. Advanced age at treatment initiation was associated with higher incidence of single agent therapy (p=0.0005, ANOVA statistics). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that elderly patients with mCRC tolerate anti-EGFR therapy, with toxicity rates similar to those reported in large clinical trials with younger patient populations. Older mCRC patients can safely receive anti-EGFR treatment as part of their therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document