scholarly journals Techniques of using circulating tumor DNA as a liquid biopsy component in cancer management

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 370-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Elazezy ◽  
Simon A. Joosse
2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 456-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Fernandes Marques ◽  
Joana Pereira Reis ◽  
Gabriela Fernandes ◽  
Venceslau Hespanhol ◽  
José Carlos Machado ◽  
...  

Liquid biopsy was introduced to the oncology field with the promise of revolutionizing the management of cancer patients, minimizing the exposure to invasive procedures such as tissue biopsy, and providing reliable information regarding therapy response and detection of disease relapse. Despite the significant increase in the number of published studies on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the past years, the emphasis of most studies is on the development of new technologies or on the clinical utility of ctDNA. This leaves a clear gap of knowledge concerning the biology of ctDNA, such as the fundamental mechanisms through which DNA from tumor cells is released into the circulation. Moreover, considering that ctDNA analysis is now currently being applied in clinical practice, the need for rigorous quality control is arising, and with it the necessity to standardize procedures, from sample collection to data analysis. This review focuses on the main aspects of ctDNA, including approaches currently available to evaluate tumor genetics, as well as the points that still require improvement in order to make liquid biopsy a key player in precision medicine.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3443
Author(s):  
Ayanthi A. Wijewardene ◽  
Marthe Chehade ◽  
Matti L. Gild ◽  
Roderick J. Clifton-Bligh ◽  
Martyn Bullock

Liquid biopsies are a novel technique to assess for either circulating tumor cells (CTC) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA and microRNA (miRNA)) in peripheral blood samples of cancer patients. The diagnostic role of liquid biopsy in oncology has expanded in recent years, particularly in lung, colorectal and breast cancer. In thyroid cancer, the role of liquid biopsy in either diagnosis or prognosis is beginning to translate from the lab to the clinic. In this review, we describe the evolution of liquid biopsies in detecting CTC, ctDNA and miRNA in thyroid cancer patients, together with its limitations and future directions in clinical practice.


Tumor Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 101042831770574 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Nadal ◽  
T Winder ◽  
A Gerger ◽  
David Tougeron

Tumor biopsy is currently the gold standard for diagnosis and in determining cell signaling pathways involved in the development of treatment resistance. However, there are major challenges with this technique, including the need for serial sampling to monitor treatment resistance, which is invasive and also has the potential for selection bias due to intra-tumoral and inter-tumoral heterogeneity. These challenges highlight the need for more effective methods for obtaining Tumor samples. Liquid biopsy analyzes genetic material or tumor cells shed into the blood from the primary tumor and metastatic sites and consequently provides a comprehensive, real-time picture of the tumor burden in an individual patient. Indeed, liquid biopsy has the potential to revolutionize cancer management. Here, we review recent studies on the potential clinical applications of liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer, including screening, diagnosis, detection of minimal residual disease after surgery, detection of recurrence, prognosis, predicting treatment response, monitoring tumor burden or response during treatment, and tracking resistance. We also discuss recent data demonstrating the utility of detecting KRAS-mutated circulating tumor DNA, both at diagnosis to determine an appropriate treatment strategy and during anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy to predict treatment resistance. The future integration of liquid biopsy into clinical practice is discussed, together with alternative approaches and key questions that need to be answered in future clinical studies before this technology can be implemented and used routinely.


Author(s):  
María Arechederra ◽  
Matías A. Ávila ◽  
Carmen Berasain

AbstractThe term liquid biopsy is used in contraposition to the traditional “solid” tissue biopsy. In the oncology field it has opened a new plethora of clinical opportunities as tumor-derived material is shedded into the different biofluids from where it can be isolated and analyzed. Common biofluids include blood, urine, saliva, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), pleural effusion or bile. Starting from these biological specimens several analytes can be isolated, among which we will review the most widely used: circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor RNA (ctRNA), proteins, metabolites, and exosomes. Regarding the nature of the biomarkers it will depend on the analyte, the type of tumor and the clinical application of the liquid biopsy and it includes, somatic point mutations, deletions, amplifications, gene-fusions, DNA-methylated marks, tumor-specific miRNAs, proteins or metabolites. Here we review the characteristics of the analytes and the methodologies used for their isolation. We also describe the applications of the liquid biopsy in the management of patients with cancer, from the early detection of cancers to treatment guidance in patients with advanced tumors. Finally, we also discuss some current limitations and still open questions.


The Analyst ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojun Liu ◽  
Zhangjian Wu ◽  
Xinyi Lin ◽  
Wei Bu ◽  
Lei Qin ◽  
...  

Monitoring ctDNA in blood is important to cancer management. Here, we develop a one-step single particle counting approach for directly quantifying ctDNA in plasma. Hairpin DNA containing a triple helix...


Author(s):  
Annarita Perillo ◽  
Mohamed Vincenzo Agbaje Olufemi ◽  
Jacopo De Robbio ◽  
Rossella Margherita Mancuso ◽  
Anna Roscigno ◽  
...  

Lung cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. To date, tissue biopsy has been the gold standard for the diagnosis and the identification of specific molecular mutations, to guide choice of therapy. However, this procedure has several limitations. Liquid biopsy could represent a solution to the intrinsic limits of traditional biopsy. It can detect cancer markers such as circulating tumor DNA or RNA (ctDNA, ctRNA), and circulating tumor cells, in plasma, serum or other biological fluids. This procedure is minimally invasive, reproducible and can be used repeatedly. The main clinical applications of liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are the early diagnosis, stratification of the risk of relapse, identification of mutations to guide application of targeted therapy and the evaluation of the minimum residual disease. In this review, the current role of liquid biopsy and associated markers in the management of NSCLC patients was analyzed, with emphasis on ctDNA and CTCs, and radiotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (0) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Atsushi Imai ◽  
Kiyoshi Misawa ◽  
Satoshi Yamada ◽  
Jun Okamura ◽  
Daiki Mochizuki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3506-3506
Author(s):  
Andrea Sartore-Bianchi ◽  
Filippo Pietrantonio ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Benedetta Mussolin ◽  
Francesco Rua ◽  
...  

3506 Background: Despite advances in molecular segmentation of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), beyond RAS status therapeutic actionability remains confined to the limited subgroups of ERBB2 amplified, BRAF mutated and MSI-H patients. Optimization of available treatments is therefore warranted. Rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies is often empirically used with some benefit as late-line therapy. We previously found that mutant RAS and EGFR ectodomain clones, which emerge in blood during EGFR blockade, decline upon antibody withdrawal leading to regain drug sensitivity. Based on this rationale, we designed CHRONOS, a multicenter phase II trial of anti-EGFR therapy rechallenge guided by monitoring of the mutational status of RAS, BRAF and EGFR in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). To our knowledge, this is the first interventional clinical trial of liquid biopsy for driving anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in mCRC. Methods: Eligible patients were PS ECOG 0-2 RAS/BRAF WT mCRC having first achieved an objective response and then progression in any treatment line with an anti-EGFR antibody containing regimen, displaying RAS, BRAF and EGFR ectodomain WT status in ctDNA at molecular screening after progression to the last anti-EGFR-free regimen. Clonal evolution in ctDNA was analyzed by ddPCR and next generation sequencing. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg was administered IV every two weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST version 1.1 with independent central review. 27 total patients and 6 responses were required to declare the study positive (power = 85%, type I error = 0.05). Results: Between Aug 19, 2019 and Nov 6, 2020 52 patients were screened by liquid biopsy and 36 (69%) were negative in ctDNA for RAS/BRAF/EGFR mutations. Of these, 27 patients were enrolled in 4 centers. Median age was 64 years (range: 42-80). PS ECOG was 0/50%, 1/46%, 2/4%. Previous anti-EGFR was administered in 1st line in 63%, 2nd in 15% and > 2nd in 22%. Median number of previous treatments was 3. The primary endpoint was met, with 8/27 partial responses (PR) observed (2 unconfirmed) (ORR = 30%, 95% CI: 12-47%). Stable disease (SD) was obtained in 11/27 (40%, 95% CI: 24-59%), lasting > 4 months in 8/11. Disease control rate (PR plus SD > 4 months) was therefore obtained in 16/27 (59%, 95% CI: 41-78%). Median progression-free survival was 16 weeks. Median duration of response was 17 weeks (1 ongoing). Maximal grade toxicity was G3, limited to dermatological and occurring in 19% of patients. ctDNA dynamics were studied in all patients. Conclusions: Liquid biopsy-driven rechallenge with anti-EGFR antibodies leads to further objective responses in one third of patients. Genotyping tumor DNA in the blood to direct therapy can be effectively incorporated in the management of advanced CRCs. Clinical trial information: 2016-002597-12.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document