The Role of Fibrinolytic Therapy in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism

2005 ◽  
Vol 51 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 124-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Comerota
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-350
Author(s):  
Dr. Girish.L Dandagi ◽  
◽  
Venkat kalyana kumar. P ◽  
Dr. Dr.Isaac Mathew ◽  
Dr. Dr.G S Gaude Dr. Dr.G S Gaude

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 2627
Author(s):  
Francisco Galeano-Valle ◽  
Lucía Ordieres-Ortega ◽  
Crhistian Mario Oblitas ◽  
Jorge del-Toro-Cervera ◽  
Luis Alvarez-Sala-Walther ◽  
...  

The relationship between inflammation and venous thrombosis is not well understood. An inflammatory response may be both the cause and consequence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In fact, several risk factors of VTE modulate thrombosis through inflammatory markers. Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is burdened by a remarkable mortality rate, up to 34% in severely ill patients presenting with hemodynamic instability. Initial mortality risk stratification is based on hemodynamic instability. Patients with a situation of hemodynamic stability require immediate further risk assessment based on clinical, imaging, and circulating biomarkers, as well as the presence of comorbidities. Some inflammatory biomarkers have shown potential usefulness in the risk stratification of patients with VTE, especially acute PE. C-reactive protein on admission is associated with 30-day mortality and bleeding in VTE patients. P-selectin is associated with right ventricle dysfunction in PE patients and might be associated with VTE recurrences and the extension of thrombosis. Tissue factor microparticles are associated with VTE recurrence in cancer-associated thrombosis. Other inflammatory biomarkers present scarce evidence (inflammatory cytokines, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fibrinogen, leukocyte count). In this manuscript, we will review the prognostic role of different inflammatory biomarkers available both for clinical practice and research in VTE patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (02) ◽  
pp. 171-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Baba-Ahmed ◽  
Grégoire Le Gal ◽  
Francis Couturaud ◽  
Karine Lacut ◽  
Emmanuel Oger ◽  
...  

SummaryAmong candidate risk factors associated with postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), the role of factorV Leiden (FVL) mutation remains unclear. We performed a case-control study to assess the potential significance of FVL mutation in postoperative VTE cases despite prophylaxis. We used data from the ongoing case-control “EDITH” study. We extracted 133VTE cases and 144 controls who had undergone either surgery or had plaster cast in the previous three months. Prophylaxis adequacy with regard to the recommendations published by theAmerican College of Chest Physicians was retrospectively assessed. FVL mutation was present in 20VTE cases and four controls (OR 5.9, 95% CI 2–18). Prophylaxis was judged as adequate in 116 cases (88.5 %) and in 129 controls (87.2 %) (p = 0.66). The frequency of FVL mutation was not different in VTE cases occurring while on adequate prophylaxis and in VTE cases occurring after the end of adequate prophylaxis (p = 0.27). FVL mutation was closely associated with postoperative VTE in patients classified as having received an adequate prophylaxis (8.4; 95% CI, 2.4 to 29). This study shows a close association between the presence of factorV Leiden mutation in symptomaticVTE occurring after surgery despite prophylaxis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document