A four-year naturalistic prospective study of cardiometabolic disease in antipsychotic-treated patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Mackin ◽  
T. Waton ◽  
H.M. Watkinson ◽  
P. Gallagher

AbstractThe relationship between antipsychotic use and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is controversial. There is a lack of long-term prospective studies investigating changes in cardiometabolic risk in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs. We report data from a 4-year prospective study. Patients (89) underwent detailed metabolic and cardiovascular risk assessment at 4-years which included anthropometric assessment, blood pressure, lipid profile, and an oral glucose tolerance test. We used the homeostatic model assessment to determine insulin resistance, and calculated 10-year cardiovascular risk scores. Mean age of subjects was 44.7 (±11.5) years, and 52% were male. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 8%, and 38.4% fulfilled diagnostic criteria for the metabolic syndrome. With the exception of increased central adiposity over the 4-year follow-up period (p < 0.001), other cardiometabolic parameters were generally unchanged. There was a high prevalence of dyslipidaemia, but only 16.9% were prescribed lipid-lowering treatment. Commencing lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular risk score (OR 7.9, 95% CI = 1.3 to 48.7; p = 0.02). Patients established on longer-term antipsychotic treatment show less dramatic metabolic changes than those occurring in the early stages of treatment, but have a high burden of cardiovascular risk. Lipid-lowering therapy is associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular risk.

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 409-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette M. Galema-Boers ◽  
Mattie J. Lenzen ◽  
Sophie R. Engelkes ◽  
Eric J. Sijbrands ◽  
Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy A Lauderdale ◽  
Amy Heck Sheehan

OBJECTIVE: To describe current data evaluating the use of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients with coronary heart disease. DATA SOURCES: A literature search using MEDLINE (1966–September 2004) was conducted using the search terms lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, coronary arteriosclerosis, and coronary disease to identify published trials comparing the effects of intensive and conventional lipid-lowering therapy. DATA SYNTHESIS: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy reduces LDL-C levels significantly more than conventional treatment and appears to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients who have recently experienced acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, evidence suggesting clinical benefits in patients with stable coronary heart disease is currently lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Although data are limited, patients with ACS may benefit from intensive lipid-lowering therapy. Several studies are underway to determine the appropriate role of intensive lipid-lowering therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-73
Author(s):  
Daria Yu. Sedykh ◽  
◽  
Natalia V. Fedorova ◽  
Vasily V. Kashtalap ◽  
◽  
...  

The article demonstrates the possibility of prescribing an effective and safe lipid-lowering combination of the most tolerated doses of statins in combination with ezetimibe, using the example of a patient with severe lipid metabolism disorders in the post-infarction period. It has been shown that in real clinical practice, patients with acute coronary syndrome and persisting high LDL values are quite common, despite of the prescription of statins. These patients need closer follow-up and wider use of combined lipid-lowering therapy by adding ezetimibe to maximally tolerated doses of statins. Current clinical guidelines allow this to be done when patients fail to achieve target LDL values (>1.4 mmol/L) with statins monotherapy. This approach is effective and safe, which is illustrated by this hereditary clinical case. In routine clinical practice mandatory lipids control is required 4–6 weeks after patient’s discharge from the hospital for acute coronary syndrome. If the target lipids values were not achieved with the maximum dosage of statins, a mandatory using the combination therapy with ezetimibe is required. Keywords: myocardial infarction, dyslipidemia, improved prognosis, statins, ezetimibe For citation: Sedykh DYu, Fedorova NV, Kashtalap VV. Possibilities of combination lipid-lowering therapy in a patient with very high cardiovascular risk (сlinical case). Consilium Medicum. 2021; 23 (1): 70–73. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2021.1.200604


Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma EF Kleipool ◽  
Johannes AN Dorresteijn ◽  
Yvo M Smulders ◽  
Frank LJ Visseren ◽  
Mike JL Peters ◽  
...  

Due to an increasing number of older adults with (risk factors for) cardiovascular disease (CVD), the sum of older adults eligible for lipid-lowering drugs will increase. This has risen questions about benefits and harms of lipid-lowering therapy in older adults with a varying number of (cardiovascular) comorbidities and functional status. The heterogeneity in physical and functional health increases with age, leading to a much wider variety in cardiovascular risk and life expectancy than in younger adults. We suggest treatment decisions on hypercholesterolaemia in adults aged ≥75 years should shift from a strictly 10-year cardiovascular risk-driven approach to a patient-centred and lifetime benefit-based approach. With this, estimated 10-year risk of CVD should be placed into the perspective of life expectancy. Moreover, frailty and safety concerns must be taken into account for a risk–benefit discussion between clinician and patient. Based on the Dutch addendum ‘Cardiovascular Risk Management in (frail) older adults’, our approach offers more detailed information on when not to initiate or deprescribe therapy than standard guidelines. Instead of using traditional risk estimating tools which tend to overestimate risk of CVD in older adults, use a competing risk adjusted, older adults-specific risk score (available at https://u-prevent.com). By filling in a patient’s (cardiovascular) health profile (eg, cholesterol, renal function), the tool estimates risk of CVD and models the effect of medication in terms of absolute risk reduction for an individual patient. Using this tool can guide doctors and patients in making shared decisions on initiating, continuing or deprescribing lipid-lowering therapy.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4687-4687
Author(s):  
Kamila Izabela Cisak ◽  
Jianmin Pan ◽  
Shesh Nath Rai ◽  
Patricia Ashby ◽  
Vivek R. Sharma

Abstract Introduction Hemophilia A and B are genetic disorders characterized by deficiency of clotting factors resulting in delayed bleeding. Despite hypocoagulable state, patients with hemophilia are prone to developing coronary artery disease or its equivalents. It is known that proper treatment of dyslipidemia has relevant impact of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events reduction. The goal of our study was to determine implementation of newest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol in our patients with hemophilia and assess how many more patients currently may require lipid-lowering therapy. Methods We performed retrospective chart review of patients followed at single hemophilia treatment center in United States. We included 30 patients with factor VIII or IX deficiency, age 30 and older, followed in clinic between 2005 and 2014 with available lipid profile results. Patients with acquired hemophilia were excluded from study. We used stepwise approach proposed by above guidelines and divided patients into four groups. Results 4 patients among 30 were already on lipid lowering therapy. 1 (3.3%) additional patient [95% CI 0.001-0.17] required lipid lowering therapy due to presence of clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (group 1), 0 patients had LDL-C at least 190 mg/dl (group 2), 2 (6.7%) additional patients [95% CI 0.008-0.21] required therapy due to presence of diabetes mellitus and 40 to 75 year of age and LDL-C levels of 70 to 189 mg/dl (group 3); 9 (30%) additional patients [95% CI 0.17-0.51] should receive therapy due to age 40 to 75 and estimated 10-year ASCVD risk above 7.5%. We had total 12 (40%) additional patients among 30 with known lipid profile who were not on lipid lowering therapy but who require such therapy based on the latest 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol. Conclusion Aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modifications play a significant role in prevention of coronary artery disease, stroke and peripheral vascular disease. This may be even more relevant in patients with hemophilia who have an increased baseline risk of bleeding and may therefore be at greater risk of complications from anti-thrombotic therapies used for treating cardiovascular disease. Above results suggest that according to actual 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol, a significant number of patients with hemophilia may require lipid lowering therapy. It is important for hemophilia treatment centers to screen their patients with regard to this since many of them may either not have primary care physicians or may not be perceived as having high risk for cardiovascular disease due to their bleeding disorder. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document