Brief Family Psycho-Education Program for Caregivers of Inpatients with Severe Mental Illness

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s789-s789
Author(s):  
F. Lima ◽  
T. Selau ◽  
V. Menegalli ◽  
P. Magalhães ◽  
A. Rosa

IntroductionFamily psycho-education is an essential part of the treatment for people with severe mental illness (SMI), however this relevant intervention is underutilized. Shortened variations of family psycho-education have been described in attempts to make it more attractive, efficient, and feasible.Objectives/aimsConsidering the lack of manualized intervention for families in Brazil, our study comes up with a proposal to implement and to evaluate the feasibility of brief family psycho-education program (BFPP) during inpatient psychiatric treatment.MethodsAn extensive review using a combination of the words: “family psychoeducation”; “severe mental illness”; “schizophrenia”; “bipolar disorder” was conducted in PubMed/Medline with the aim to select reports of multifamily group psycho-educational programs. Studies involving adults with severe mental illness published until March 2016 were included.ResultsAfter the review of literature and meeting with experts in SMI, the BFPP was developed collaboratively by bipolar disorders’ team at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). The standard BFPP consists of four sessions: (1) causes, symptoms, course, prognosis and stigma of severe mental disorder; (2) treatment; (3) community resources, communication skills and importance of healthy and regular habits; and (4) problem-solving strategies: preventing relapses and establishing plans for crisis. Each session will occur weekly, lasting 90 min, with 8–12 caregivers. The patients did not attend the group.ConclusionWe purposed a standard, brief, cheap and simple intervention to apply. We believe that BFPP is highly suitable for caregivers of patients with SMI. We hope that this program demonstrates feasibility among participants and become a useful and effective intervention.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eline C. Jochems ◽  
Sylvia C. M. Scheffer ◽  
Hugo J. Dulvenvoorden ◽  
Arno van Dam ◽  
Christina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S577-S577 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Ouali ◽  
R. Jomli ◽  
R. Nefzi ◽  
H. Ouertani ◽  
F. Nacef

IntroductionMental patients generally internalize some of the negative conceptions about how most people view them: they might be considered incompetent or untrustworthy or believe that people would not want to hire, or marry someone with mental illness. A lot of research on stigma has been conducted in western countries; however, little is still known on the situation in Arab-Muslim societies.ObjectivesTo evaluate social stigma as viewed by patients suffering from severe mental illness (SMI)MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study on clinically stabilized patients with schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder (BD) according to DSM IV, who were interviewed in our out-patients clinic with the help of a semi-structured questionnaire, containing 8 opinions on the social inclusion and stigmatization of psychiatric patients, with special reference to the local cultural context (e.g.: “It is better to hide mental illness in order to preserve the reputation of my family”)ResultsWe included 104 patients, 51% with schizophrenia and 49% with BD. Mean age was 38.4 years (18–74 years); 59.6% were males. Overall social stigma scores were high. Social stigma in patients was correlated with gender, age, place of residence and diagnosis. Patients with BD showed significantly less social stigma than patients with schizophrenia.ConclusionOur results show the need for a better understanding of this phenomenon in patients with SMI, but also within Tunisian society, in order to elaborate anti stigma strategies adapted to the local context.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s899-s899 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Banerjee ◽  
G. Desai ◽  
P.S. Chandra

BackgroundContrary to popular myth, majority of mentally ill women are mothers with increasing number of them seeking help. Little is known about their own experiences in this regard and the extent to which their needs are met.ObjectivesTo assess the barriers and facilitators in seeking help from mental health care providers in matters of pregnancy and parenting.MethodsThe study used qualitative design with social constructivist paradigm. A purposive sample of 30 mothers with severe mental illness was obtained. Data was collected through one-to-one in-depth semi-structured interviews. After verbatim transcription, inductive thematic analysis was used to explore transcripts.ResultsMost women considered motherhood “central” to their lives and almost all of them experienced the burden of the “dual role”. Main barriers in seeking help were stigma, treatment side effects, wrong information and time constraints. Whereas self-advocacy, early engagement, education of women and involvement of the family with service providers were the facilitating factors. The prime expectations of the mothers as identified were early and direct communication, patient audience and basic guidance in regards to child health and parenting issues.ConclusionWomen who are mothers and also users of mental health services face special challenges in managing the contradictory aspects of their dual identity. Hearing their voices are essential for service provision and ensuring adequate mental health needs. Early and direct intervention along with understanding and addressing critical areas are necessary for proper care of both the mother and child.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S687-S687
Author(s):  
G. Hernande. Santillan ◽  
E. Martin Ballesteros

A 51-year-old woman from a Mediterranean location with a history of a brother diagnosed with schizophrenia, moved thirty years ago, away from her family of origin, when marrying a man suffering from severe untreated OCD, who in turn, has two brothers, both with OCD, and a nephew with OCD. She says that her husband is very unsociable, spends most of the day at work and comes home at night to clean for a long time until he does not see lint on the floor or a crumb on the table literally. They have a fifteen-year-old son, with needy materials, very attached to the mother and very little to the father. The patient consults, motivated by a former sister-in-law and a friend, because they have noticed deterioration in their self-care and tendency to isolation, which the patient explains because in the last year she has noticed exacerbation of the comments by her neighbours and even unknown people that tell her “look how dirty, your husband has to come after work to clean your house, and makes noise.” The companions are also concerned that the child has had school and social problems and admits hearing the same as his mother. Now, What possible diagnoses do we propose in this patient: Folie a deux, delusional disorder, paraphrenia, other? (Figure 1)Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S401-S401
Author(s):  
M. O’Connell ◽  
M. Costa ◽  
A. Gonzalez ◽  
G. Damio ◽  
K. Ruiz ◽  
...  

IntroductionUnemployment is common in persons with severe mental illness (SMI) and more in Latino population. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS) of Connecticut offers a supported employment (SE) Program to help clients get competitive work in integrated settings with nondisabled workers in the community.ObjectiveCapture perspectives of key informant groups to describe barriers for linking Latinos with SMI to employment and adapt SE Services for subpopulations.MethodFour focus groups were conducted (employment specialists, case managers and peer support counselors/employers/two with clients-one in Spanish and other in English). They were conducted during January-February 2015, 70–90 minutes each one. A question guide was developed for each group. Participants per focus group ranged from 3–10, voluntarily. Two new questionnaires to the baseline pack were developed: challenges to Employment Assessment–provider and client version.ResultsThirty individuals participated. Several barriers to employment were reported. Clients and staff reported criminal record, lack of employment history and lack of motivation. Staff described client hygiene, mental status, physical health, substance abuse and discrimination. Clients, staff and employers reported language barrier for Latinos who don’t speak English. Non-adherence to medication was reported by clients and employers. About Spanish-Speaking Latinos with mental illness, medication, discrimination, previous abuse by employers, inappropriate employment, difficulties of the job interview and computer skills appeared as challenges. English-Speaking Latinos with mental illness identified transport, stability, support, keeping apartment and financial needs.ConclusionsFocus groups can help in knowledge about the diversity of Latino communities to improve SE Services and outcomes for Latinos.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S518-S518
Author(s):  
A. Fontaine

IntroductionIn recent years, numerous studies about the image of psychiatry have been conducted. However, to our knowledge, a significant part of psychiatry has been very little explored: the vision of psychiatric hospitals (PsH). For instance, “PsH” on google images reveals a long list of frightening pictures of ravaged places.Objectives/AimsWith such an image spread by the medias, we wanted to evaluate the vision of PsH and treatment modalities among general population in 2015, in 4 countries: France, Spain, England, and Brazil.MethodsAn online survey in 4 languages has been sent via facebook and emails. Two hundred and fifteen responses were collected during September 2015: 178 French, 11 Spanish, 17 Brazilians, 9 English.ResultsThirty-nine percent of participants consider PsH as a place of care, and 16% as an asylum. There were differences among countries: for example, asylum is more represented in France than Spain. Regarding patients admitted in PsH, they are not all dangerous (90%), nor all irresponsible (94%) and have specifics rights (66%). Concerning diseases: delirium, bipolar disorders, and perversity are to be treated in PsH, while depression, addiction, and autism are to be cured in psychiatric structures other than hospital. Moreover, 2% of participants believe abuses are common practice, whereas a majority consider therapeutic activities instead.ConclusionsThese results are quite different from the studies based on the perception of mental illness and patients. Here, on the overall, they are quite encouraging. So, PsH could lead the path on the improvement of the image of psychiatry.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Burton ◽  
Stamatina Marougka ◽  
Stefan Priebe

SUMMARYAim – To identify whether financial or material incentives improve treatment adherence in people with severe mental illness. Method – A systematic review of studies published between 1950 and 2008 was conducted. EMBASE, MEDLINE, EBM, AMED and PsycINFO were searched. Studies were included if a financial or material incentive was offered and if the sample had a severe mental illness. Results – Fourteen articles were identified; three studies on adherence to psychiatric treatment and one on physical exercise. Ten articles used incentives for adherence to substance misuse treatment programmes. In all studies, financial incentives were associated with an increase in adherence; however the effect was not always maintained once the incentive was withdrawn. Conclusion – While existing research suggests that financial incentives may improve treatment adherence in severely mentally ill populations, very few studies focus on psychiatric treatment. Further research may address the long term effectiveness of incentives on adherence in this population.Declaration of Interest: The authors on this paper were supported by funds from the Wellcome Trust. All authors worked on a Wellcome Trust funded qualitative focus group study exploring stakeholder views on offering patients financial incentives to adhere to antipsychotic medication. Priebe is also lead applicant on a National Institute of Health Research (England) (NIHR) awarded grant to conduct a clinical trial on the use of financial incentives to achieve maintenance antipsychotic medication adherence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. S638-S639
Author(s):  
I. Prieto Sánchez ◽  
M.D.L.C. Ramírez Domínguez ◽  
N. Garrido Torres ◽  
S. Fernández León ◽  
M. Reina Domínguez ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe theory of self-medication in patients with severe mental illness has been exposed for years but to date has not been confirmed or ruled out. With this study, we intend to show the latest available evidence regarding this context.MethodsAn exhaustive literature research in Medline and the latest forth in APA 2015.ResultsMore and more evidence refute the veracity of this theory deeply rooted among some professionals.ConclusionThere are theoretical alternatives that relate more sustained manner the relationship between consumption and toxic psychosis.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document