Effects of roasting temperature and time on aldehyde formation derived from lipid oxidation in scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) and the deterrent effect by antioxidants of bamboo leaves

2021 ◽  
pp. 130936
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Hu ◽  
Guanhua Zhao ◽  
Fawen Yin ◽  
Zhongyuan Liu ◽  
Jialiang Wang ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Hu ◽  
Guanhua Zhao ◽  
Jialiang Wang ◽  
Zhongyuan Liu ◽  
fawen Yin ◽  
...  

This study investigated lipid oxidation and aldehyde formation in roasted scallop during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion, and the effects of co-digestion of antioxidant of bamboo leaves (AOB) on this process....


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Xuan Wu ◽  
Yu-Xin Liu ◽  
Man-Man Yu ◽  
Fa-Wen Yin ◽  
Zi-Qiang Liu ◽  
...  

Nutrient loss, caused by lipid oxidation and hydrolysis, occurs in the scallop adductor muscle during refrigerated storage. To retard this process, chitosan coating with inclusion of antioxidant of bamboo leaves (AOB) and potassium sorbate (PS) were used. Results indicated the coatings employed could significantly inhibit the increases in total number of colonies, total volatile basic nitrogen, peroxide value, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, lipase activity and free fatty acid content as well as the decrease in contents of triacylglycerols, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in the scallop adductor muscle during refrigerated storage. After 8 days, the contents of PUFA, eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexenoic acid in the control adductor muscle decreased by 46.91, 47.46 and 45.50%, respectively, while the corresponding values were 35.93-36.68, 34.01-36.45 and 32.73-37.50%, respectively, for AOB- and PS-coated adductor muscles. Therefore, chitosan coatings incorporated with AOB and PS could retard nutrient loss by inhibiting lipid oxidation and hydrolysis.


1983 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Glassner ◽  
Margret Ksander ◽  
Bruce Berg ◽  
Bruce D. Johnson
Keyword(s):  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 165-LB
Author(s):  
ITZEL FLORES ◽  
CHRIS SHANNON ◽  
MARCEL FOURCAUDOT ◽  
TERRY BAKEWELL ◽  
LUKE NORTON

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1981-P
Author(s):  
AVIGDOR D. ARAD ◽  
FREDERICK J. DIMENNA ◽  
HANNAH D. KITTRELL ◽  
HARRY R. KISSILEFF ◽  
JEANINE ALBU

Diabetes ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1341-1350 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Felber ◽  
E. Ferrannini ◽  
A. Golay ◽  
H. U. Meyer ◽  
D. Theibaud ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vipin Narang

The world is in a second nuclear age in which regional powers play an increasingly prominent role. These states have small nuclear arsenals, often face multiple active conflicts, and sometimes have weak institutions. How do these nuclear states—and potential future ones—manage their nuclear forces and influence international conflict? Examining the reasoning and deterrence consequences of regional power nuclear strategies, this book demonstrates that these strategies matter greatly to international stability and it provides new insights into conflict dynamics across important areas of the world such as the Middle East, East Asia, and South Asia. The book identifies the diversity of regional power nuclear strategies and describes in detail the posture each regional power has adopted over time. Developing a theory for the sources of regional power nuclear strategies, the book offers the first systematic explanation of why states choose the postures they do and under what conditions they might shift strategies. It then analyzes the effects of these choices on a state's ability to deter conflict. Using both quantitative and qualitative analysis, the book shows that, contrary to a bedrock article of faith in the canon of nuclear deterrence, the acquisition of nuclear weapons does not produce a uniform deterrent effect against opponents. Rather, some postures deter conflict more successfully than others. This book considers the range of nuclear choices made by regional powers and the critical challenges they pose to modern international security.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Nomensen Freddy Siahaan

After a long time was not heard to the public area, lately death penalty toward the criminal cases that classified as extraordinary crime are appear. The author discovers electronic article about the execution of the death penalty which is the prosecutor prepares to execute death penalty toward the drugs dealer. The president of Republic of Indonesia stated that it is necessary to give a deterrent effect to the convicted  criminal and keep the morality of Indonesian teenagers. According to my opinion, the author argues that it will be better and wiser if we discuss about renovating all of the Penitentiary in Indonesia than debating whether death penalty could be done in Indonesia or not, because it will be displeasure many parties, death penalty infringed the human rights of the convicted criminals and cause psychological burden to them, families, the executor of the death penalty, and other parties. Because if we have to improve the quality of the Penitentiary, if the function of Penitentiary for fostering moralily has been optimal or properly enough to the convicted criminals, Indonesia will be no longer need the death penalty option as sanction to the convicted crimanals including for the extraordinary crime (especially for drugs trafficking in our country). Penitentiary is one of the public services which aims for fostering the people that initially have bad habits (commited to the crime), so that they will have the awareness to change their bad attitude into the be better ones, will not harm others, and positively contributed to the society. Already Penitentiary’s conditions should be designed in such a way and as good as possible, so that the inmates feels like at their own home (like having a second home after his own home), and feel humaner to spend their days in the Penitentiary. The author believes that if the Penitentiary has been improved and optimized its function well, then the real purpose of Penitentiary will definitely achieved. As stated in Law Number 12 Year 1995 regarding to Penitentiary Article 2 which states "sanction system are organized in order to fostering the convicted criminals in order to be the real man, aware of their fault, improve themselves, and not to repeat the criminal act so that they can be friendly received by the community, can actively participated in the development of our country, and can socialize themselves as good citizen."Article 3 on this regulation also intensifies the function of Penitentiary "the function of Penitentiary is to prepare convicted criminals to be able to properly integrated to the society, so they can be accepted again as members of the public who are free and responsible ones." 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document