scholarly journals Risky repair: DNA-protein crosslinks formed by mitochondrial base excision DNA repair enzymes acting on free radical lesions

2017 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 146-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Audrey Caston ◽  
Bruce Demple
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Free Radical ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Base Excision Dna Repair ◽  
Protein Crosslinks

scholarly journals New perspectives in cancer biology from a study of canonical and non-canonical functions of base excision repair proteins with a focus on early steps

Mutagenesis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matilde Clarissa Malfatti ◽  
Giulia Antoniali ◽  
Marta Codrich ◽  
Silvia Burra ◽  
Giovanna Mangiapane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Base Excision

Abstract Alterations of DNA repair enzymes and consequential triggering of aberrant DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are thought to play a pivotal role in genomic instabilities associated with cancer development, and are further thought to be important predictive biomarkers for therapy using the synthetic lethality paradigm. However, novel unpredicted perspectives are emerging from the identification of several non-canonical roles of DNA repair enzymes, particularly in gene expression regulation, by different molecular mechanisms, such as (i) non-coding RNA regulation of tumour suppressors, (ii) epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of genes involved in genotoxic responses and (iii) paracrine effects of secreted DNA repair enzymes triggering the cell senescence phenotype. The base excision repair (BER) pathway, canonically involved in the repair of non-distorting DNA lesions generated by oxidative stress, ionising radiation, alkylation damage and spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of nucleotide bases, represents a paradigm for the multifaceted roles of complex DDR in human cells. This review will focus on what is known about the canonical and non-canonical functions of BER enzymes related to cancer development, highlighting novel opportunities to understand the biology of cancer and representing future perspectives for designing new anticancer strategies. We will specifically focus on APE1 as an example of a pleiotropic and multifunctional BER protein.

scholarly journals HIV-1 and HIV-2 exhibit divergent interactions with HLTF and UNG2 DNA repair proteins

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (27) ◽  
pp. E3921-E3930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasia Hrecka ◽  
Caili Hao ◽  
Ming-Chieh Shun ◽  
Sarabpreet Kaur ◽  
Selene K. Swanson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Hiv Replication ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Dna Repair Proteins ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
Hiv 1

HIV replication in nondividing host cells occurs in the presence of high concentrations of noncanonical dUTP, apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing, enzyme-catalytic, polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3) cytidine deaminases, and SAMHD1 (a cell cycle-regulated dNTP triphosphohydrolase) dNTPase, which maintains low concentrations of canonical dNTPs in these cells. These conditions favor the introduction of marks of DNA damage into viral cDNA, and thereby prime it for processing by DNA repair enzymes. Accessory protein Vpr, found in all primate lentiviruses, and its HIV-2/simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) SIVsm paralogue Vpx, hijack the CRL4DCAF1E3 ubiquitin ligase to alleviate some of these conditions, but the extent of their interactions with DNA repair proteins has not been thoroughly characterized. Here, we identify HLTF, a postreplication DNA repair helicase, as a common target of HIV-1/SIVcpz Vpr proteins. We show that HIV-1 Vpr reprograms CRL4DCAF1E3 to direct HLTF for proteasome-dependent degradation independent from previously reported Vpr interactions with base excision repair enzyme uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2) and crossover junction endonuclease MUS81, which Vpr also directs for degradation via CRL4DCAF1E3. Thus, separate functions of HIV-1 Vpr usurp CRL4DCAF1E3 to remove key enzymes in three DNA repair pathways. In contrast, we find that HIV-2 Vpr is unable to efficiently program HLTF or UNG2 for degradation. Our findings reveal complex interactions between HIV-1 and the DNA repair machinery, suggesting that DNA repair plays important roles in the HIV-1 life cycle. The divergent interactions of HIV-1 and HIV-2 with DNA repair enzymes and SAMHD1 imply that these viruses use different strategies to guard their genomes and facilitate their replication in the host.

scholarly journals DASH-type cryptochromes – solved and open questions

2020 ◽  
Vol 401 (12) ◽  
pp. 1487-1493
Author(s):  
Stephan Kiontke ◽  
Tanja Göbel ◽  
Annika Brych ◽  
Alfred Batschauer
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Blue Light ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Essential Components ◽  
Repair Activity ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Uv Lesions

AbstractDrosophila, Arabidopsis, Synechocystis, human (DASH)-type cryptochromes (cry-DASHs) form one subclade of the cryptochrome/photolyase family (CPF). CPF members are flavoproteins that act as DNA-repair enzymes (DNA-photolyases), or as ultraviolet(UV)-A/blue light photoreceptors (cryptochromes). In mammals, cryptochromes are essential components of the circadian clock feed-back loop. Cry-DASHs are present in almost all major taxa and were initially considered as photoreceptors. Later studies demonstrated DNA-repair activity that was, however, restricted to UV-lesions in single-stranded DNA. Very recent studies, particularly on microbial organisms, substantiated photoreceptor functions of cry-DASHs suggesting that they could be transitions between photolyases and cryptochromes.

DNA Repair Enzymes in Mammalian Cells

1977 ◽  
pp. 263-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Errol C. Friedberg ◽  
Kern H. Cook ◽  
James Duncan ◽  
Kristien Mortelmans
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes

scholarly journals Base excision DNA repair and cancer

Oncotarget ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 584-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca Tell ◽  
Bruce Demple
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Base Excision Dna Repair

scholarly journals DNA damage shifts circadian clock time via Hausp-dependent Cry1 stabilization

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J Papp ◽  
Anne-Laure Huber ◽  
Sabine D Jordan ◽  
Anna Kriebs ◽  
Madelena Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Circadian Clock ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Clock Time ◽  
Dna Repair Enzymes ◽  
Repair Enzymes ◽  
Specific Protease

The circadian transcriptional repressors cryptochrome 1 (Cry1) and 2 (Cry2) evolved from photolyases, bacterial light-activated DNA repair enzymes. In this study, we report that while they have lost DNA repair activity, Cry1/2 adapted to protect genomic integrity by responding to DNA damage through posttranslational modification and coordinating the downstream transcriptional response. We demonstrate that genotoxic stress stimulates Cry1 phosphorylation and its deubiquitination by Herpes virus associated ubiquitin-specific protease (Hausp, a.k.a Usp7), stabilizing Cry1 and shifting circadian clock time. DNA damage also increases Cry2 interaction with Fbxl3, destabilizing Cry2. Thus, genotoxic stress increases the Cry1/Cry2 ratio, suggesting distinct functions for Cry1 and Cry2 following DNA damage. Indeed, the transcriptional response to genotoxic stress is enhanced in Cry1−/− and blunted in Cry2−/− cells. Furthermore, Cry2−/− cells accumulate damaged DNA. These results suggest that Cry1 and Cry2, which evolved from DNA repair enzymes, protect genomic integrity via coordinated transcriptional regulation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document