Su1436 Association of Race-Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening Utilization Among a Nationally Representative Sample of US Adults

2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. AB331
Author(s):  
Richard A. Barrett ◽  
Dianne N. Thompson ◽  
Nisser A. Umar ◽  
Hassan Brim ◽  
Hassan Ashktorab ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (12) ◽  
pp. 1128-1135
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Moss ◽  
Rebecca Ehrenkranz ◽  
Lilian G Perez ◽  
Brionna Y Hair ◽  
Anne K Julian

BackgroundCancer screening in the USA is suboptimal, particularly for individuals living in vulnerable communities. This study aimed to understand how rurality and racial segregation are independently and interactively associated with cancer screening and cancer fatalism.MethodsWe used data from a nationally representative sample of adults (n=17 736) from National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey, 2011–2017, including cancer screening (colorectal, breast, cervical, prostate) among eligible participants and cancer fatalism. These data were linked to county-level metropolitan status/rurality (US Department of Agriculture) and racial segregation (US Census). We conducted multivariable analyses of associations of geographic variables with screening and fatalism.ResultsBreast cancer screening was lower in rural (92%, SE=1.5%) than urban counties (96%, SE=0.5%) (adjusted OR (aOR)=0.52, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.87). Colorectal cancer screening was higher in highly segregated (70%, SE=1.0%) than less segregated counties (65%, SE=1.7%) (aOR=1.28, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.58). Remaining outcomes did not vary by rurality or segregation, and these variables did not interact in their associations with screening or fatalism.ConclusionSimilar to previous studies, breast cancer screening was less common in rural areas. Contrary to expectations, colorectal cancer screening was higher in highly segregated counties. More research is needed on the influence of geography on cancer screening and beliefs, and how access to facilities or information may mediate these relationships.


2010 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. S-152
Author(s):  
John M. Inadomi ◽  
Sandeep Vijan ◽  
Nancy K. Janz ◽  
Angela Fagerlin ◽  
Jennifer P. Thomas ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1022-1022
Author(s):  
C. P. Theuer ◽  
T. Taylor ◽  
W. Brewster ◽  
H. Anton-Culver

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1022-1022
Author(s):  
C. P. Theuer ◽  
T. Taylor ◽  
W. Brewster ◽  
H. Anton-Culver

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6078-6078
Author(s):  
Y. Coscas ◽  
D. Serin ◽  
L. Cals ◽  
F. Eisinger ◽  
J. Blay ◽  
...  

6078 Background: The EDIFICE study aimed to allow better understanding of population’s adhesion to the tests available for the 4 most frequent cancers: breast, colorectal, prostate and lung. In 1998 the French National Consensus Conference advocated for mass cancer screening (CS) using Hemoccult II. The departments are divided according to the existence or not of an organized program: this screening was organized in 22 departments (3 “scout” started in 1998, 9 “first wave” in 2003 and 12 “second wave” in 2004). Results are reported hereunder. Methods: This first nationwide observational study was carried out in France from January 18th to February 2nd, 2005 among a representative sample of 1504 subjects aged between 40 and 75 years and a representative sample of 600 general practitioners (GPs). Information about participating subjects included socio-demographic characteristics, attitude towards CS, and about GPs’ medical practice regarding CS. Results: Only 25% of the 970 subjects aged between 50 and 74 years had undergone a colorectal screening test. In the organized departments (OD), the rate of persons who self-report any colorectal cancer screening was 34% vs 20% in unorganized departments (UD) (OR=1.99, CI95% 1.47- 2.69, p<0.001). The rate of recent screening within a range of 2 years was 24% for OD vs 8% for UD (OR=3.35, CI95% 1.91- 5.88, p<0.01). The rate of “fear of the test and/or its results” was higher in OD: 11% versus 6% (OR=1.97, CI95% 1.11–3.49). The rate of GPs who advocated systematically for screening was 40%, 29%, 26% and 13% for scout, first wave, second wave OD and baseline UD respectively. Organization reduced the rate of screening based on colonoscopy alone from 69% persons in UD to 35% in the OD. Conclusions: The main result of this survey comparing data in the same frame of time, in the same country, is that organized programs for colorectal cancer impact of health outcomes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Eduardo J. Santiago-Rodríguez ◽  
Natalie A. Rivadeneira ◽  
Jacqueline M. Torres ◽  
Urmimala Sarkar ◽  
Robert A. Hiatt

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian S McEvoy ◽  
Nina G Shah ◽  
Sarah E Roberts ◽  
Anna M Carroll ◽  
Timothy A Platz ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA, and screening tests are underutilized. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of individuals at average risk who utilized a recommended initial screening test in a universal healthcare coverage system. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of active duty and retired military members as well as civilian beneficiaries of the Military Health System. Individuals born from 1960 to 1962 and eligible for full benefits on their 50th birthday were evaluated. Military rank or rank of benefits sponsor was used to determine socioeconomic status. Adherence to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for initial colorectal cancer screening was determined using “Current Procedural Terminology” and “Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System” codes for colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, fecal occult blood test, and fecal immunohistochemistry test. Average risk individuals who obtained early screening ages 47 to 49 were also identified. Results This study identified 275,665 individuals at average risk. Of these, 105,957 (38.4%) adhered to screening guidelines. An additional 19,806 (7.2%) individuals were screened early. Colonoscopy (82.7%) was the most common screening procedure. Highest odds of screening were associated with being active duty military (odds ratio [OR] 3.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.43 to 3.85), having highest socioeconomic status (OR 2.37, 95% CI 2.31 to 2.44), and having managed care insurance (OR 4.36, 95% CI 4.28 to 4.44). Conclusions Universal healthcare coverage does not ensure initial colorectal cancer screening utilization consistent with guidelines no does it eliminate disparities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document