scholarly journals Analysis of tumor size enhances predictive power of CA19-9 for overall survival following surgical resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S552-S553
Author(s):  
S. Said ◽  
B. Perlmutter ◽  
J. McMichael ◽  
C. Barrows ◽  
J. Scheman ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7602-7602
Author(s):  
Enrico Ruffini ◽  
Frank C. Detterbeck ◽  
Dirk Van Raemdonck ◽  
Gaetano Rocco ◽  
Pascal Alexandre Thomas ◽  
...  

7602 Background: Thymic carcinomas are rare tumors which have recently been separated from thymomas due to their different histologic/clinical characteristics. Most of the current literature is composed of small series spanned over extended time periods Methods: The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) developed a retrospective database collecting data on patients with thymic tumors submitted to surgery (1990-2011). Out of 2,265 incident cases, there were 229 thymic carcinomas. Clinical-pathologic characteristics were analyzed including age, gender, stage (Masaoka), histologic subtypes (squamous cell/others), type of resection (complete/incomplete), tumor size, induction and adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy-ChT/radiotherapy-RT), recurrence. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and the cumulative incidence of recurrence. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate (Cox-shared frailty) competing-risk models. Missing data were analysed using multiple-imputation techniques Results: A multidisciplinary approach (surgery, ChT and RT) was used in most patients. Induction therapy was employed in 78 patients (ChT, 53; ChT/RT 23; RT, 2). Adjuvant therapy was employed in 150 patients (ChT, 19; ChT/RT, 72; RT, 59). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 71% of the patients. Five and 10-year OS were 60% and 35%. Five and 10-year DFS were 62% and 43%. Cumulative incidence of recurrence was 0.25, 0.32 and 0.40 at 3, 5, and 10 years. Independent OS predictors (multivariate analysis) were young age (p=0.006), stage I/II (vs. III/IV, p=0.02), R0 resection (p<0.001), adjuvant therapy (ChT, RT or both) (p=0.02). Independent predictor of recurrence (univariate analysis) was tumor size (p=0.05). Conclusions: In thymic carcinomas submitted to surgical resection, increased age,Masaoka stages III-IV and incomplete resection had a significant impact in worsening survival. Larger tumors had an increased risk of recurrence. The administration of adjuvant ChT or RT was associated with improved overall survival. A multidisciplinary approach to these rare tumors remains essential.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4108-4108
Author(s):  
Diana Hsu ◽  
Sidney Le ◽  
Alex Chang ◽  
Austin Spitzer ◽  
George Kazantsev ◽  
...  

4108 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that represent 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. Their biologic behaviors are unpredictable with high grade, nodal metastasis, or liver metastasis lending an unfavorable prognosis. Current guidelines recommend resection for functioning tumors and those 2 cm or larger but are less straightforward regarding tumors < 2 cm in size. Previous data show that observation for nonfunctioning tumors < 2 cm can be safe and feasible; however, a significant portion of these patients may have nodal involvement or metastatic disease. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken to identify patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated at Northern California Kaiser Permanente (KP-NCAL) between February 2010 and December 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the log-rank test and Cox regression. Chi-squared test of relevant clinicopathologic factors determined which factors were predictive for overall survival (OS). Results: Mean age was 61 years in our cohort of 354 patients, with 29% over the age of 70. Mean tumor size was 3.43 cm; 32% of tumors were 2 cm or smaller. 51% of the patients had localized disease; 32% of the patients presented with metastatic disease. The pancreatic tail was the most common tumor location (38%), followed by the head of the pancreas (24%). On multivariate survival analysis, stage, location of the tumor, and surgical resection were statistically significant in terms of overall survival ( p<.001). Mean OS for patients with localized and metastatic disease was 93 months versus 37 months ( p<.001). Surgery was utilized in 8.9% of patients with metastatic disease ( p<.001). All patients with PNET smaller than 1 cm in our study group had localized disease only. However, in patients with tumor size between 1 and 2 cm, 11% had nodal or metastatic spread. Conclusions: PNETs are indolent but have malignant potential at any size. In our retrospective study, all of the patients with tumor size < 1 cm had localized disease. For those with PNETs 1-2 cm in size, 11% had nodal or metastatic spread. Based on our findings, we suggest a more aggressive surgical resection size criteria of 1 cm.[Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Yoshito Yamada ◽  
Tevfik Kaplan ◽  
Alex Soltermann ◽  
Isabelle Schmitt-Opitz ◽  
Didier Schneiter ◽  
...  

Background Primary pulmonary sarcoma (PPS) is a rare malignant lung neoplasm, and there is very little medical evidence about treatment of PPS. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcome of patients who underwent surgical resection for PPS. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent surgical resection for PPS in our institution between 1995 and 2014. Cases who only underwent biopsy were excluded. Results A total of 24 patients (18 males, 6 females), with a median age of 60 (interquartile range: 44–67) years, were analyzed. The surgical procedures performed in these patients were pneumonectomy (n = 10), lobectomy (n = 11), and wedge resection (n = 3). Complete resection was achieved in 16 patients. The pathological stages (tumor, node, metastases lung cancer classification, 8th edition) of the patients were I (n = 4), II (n = 12), III (n = 2), and IV (n = 5), and there were four cases of lymph node metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rate of the patients was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29–72). Adverse prognostic factors for overall survival were incomplete resection (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.1–42), advanced pathological stage (HR 14, 95% CI: 2.8–66), higher pathological grade (HR 4.5, 95% CI: 1.2–17), and tumor size ≥ 7 cm (HR 4.7, 95% CI: 1.1–21). Conclusions Our series of PPS revealed that incomplete resection, advanced pathological stage, higher pathological grade, and tumor size were unfavorable factors for long-term survival.


Sarcoma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Mark Brown ◽  
David Matichak ◽  
Kyla Rakoczy ◽  
John Groundland

Introduction. Osteosarcoma is the most common sarcoma of bone. Pelvic osteosarcoma presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to potential late symptom onset, metastatic dissemination at diagnosis, and inherent difficulties of wide surgical resection secondary to the complex and critical anatomy of the pelvis. The rates of survival are well reported for osteosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton, but specific details regarding presentation and survival are less known for osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was queried for primary osteosarcoma of the bony pelvis from 2004 to 2015. Cases with Collaborative Staging variables (available after 2004) were analyzed by grade, histologic subtype, surgical intervention, tumor size, tumor extension, and presence of metastasis at diagnosis. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were assessed with respect to these variables. The SEER database was then queried for age, tumor size, surgical intervention, metastasis at time of presentation, and survivorship data for patients with primary osteosarcoma of the upper extremity, lower extremity, vertebrae, thorax, and face/skull, and rates for all anatomic locations were then compared to patients with primary pelvic osteosarcoma. Results. A total of 292 cases of pelvic osteosarcoma were identified from 2004 to 2015 within the database, representing 9.8% of cases among all surveyed primary sites. The most common histologic subtype was osteoblastic osteosarcoma (69.9%), followed by chondroblastic osteosarcoma (22.3%). The majority of cases were high-grade tumors (94.3%), of size >8 cm (72.0%), and with extension beyond the originating bone (74.0%). For the entire pelvic osteosarcoma group, the 2-, 5-, 10-year survival rates were 45.6%, 26.5%, and 21.4%, respectively, which were the poorest among surveyed anatomic sites. The 5-year overall survival was an abysmal 5.3% for patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 37.0% for non-metastatic pelvic osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy. When compared to other locations, pelvic osteosarcoma had higher rates of metastatic disease at presentation (33.5%), larger median tumor size (11.0 cm), and older median age at diagnosis (47.5 years). While over 85% of patients with tumors at the extremities received surgery, only 47.4% of pelvic osteosarcomas in this cohort received surgical resection—likely influenced by larger tumor size, sacral involvement, frequency of metastasis, older age, or delayed referral to a sarcoma center. Conclusion. This study clarifies presenting features and clinical outcomes of pelvic osteosarcomas, which often present with large, high-grade tumors with extracompartmental extension, high likelihood of metastatic disease at diagnosis, and a potential limited ability to be addressed surgically. The survival rates of primary osteosarcoma of the pelvis are poor and are lower than osteosarcomas from other anatomic locations. While acknowledging the influence of metastasis, tumor characteristics, and advanced age on the decision to undergo surgical excision of a pelvic osteosarcoma, the rates of surgical resection are low and highlight the importance of understanding appropriate conditions for oncologic resection of pelvic sarcomas.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 455-455
Author(s):  
Amir A. Rahnemai-Azar ◽  
Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly ◽  
Daniel Abbott ◽  
Cecilia Grace Ethun ◽  
George A. Poultsides ◽  
...  

455 Background: Surgical resection is required for curative treatment of patients with extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EH-CCA). The objective of this study was to determine if the distance of surgical margin was associated with outcome. Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for EH-CCA between 2000 and 2015 at 10 hepatobiliary centers across the U.S. were evaluated using prospectively collected data. Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to evaluate the influence of the extent of the margin on outcome. Results: 538 patients with EH-CCA who underwent curative-intent resection were included: 383 (71%) undergoing R0 resection, 153 (28%) undergoing R1 resection, and 2 with R2 resection. A negative surgical margin (R0) was associated with improved recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (RFS: 10.5% vs. 3.6% (R1) and OS: 25.8% vs. 9.3% (R1). Subsequently, further analysis on 161 patients with complete data on distance of resection margin, all undergoing R0 resection, was performed to assess the impact of extent of margin on outcome. On multi-variable analysis, the resection margin distance, analyzed as a continuous variable, was not associated with either improved RFS (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.05; p 0.71) or OS (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.01; p 0.49). Increasing age, increased tumor size, and LN metastasis were identified as independent predictors of OS; while RFS were mainly dependent on tumor size and LN metastasis (Table). Conclusions: Achieving R0 resection is acceptable for EH-CCA tumors, and obtaining additional margin does not confer a benefit on overall survival. Increasing age, tumor size, and LN metastasis are independent predictors of RFS and OS, but increased margin width is not associated with improvement in either. Multivariable analysis of factors affecting OS of patients with extra-hepatic CCA who underwent surgical resection, with significant factors noted in bold. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 706-706
Author(s):  
Jeff Wiisanen ◽  
Patrick Navin ◽  
Moustafa El Khatib ◽  
William R Bamlet ◽  
Sean P. Cleary ◽  
...  

706 Background: In recent years, there has been a shift towards neo-adjuvant treatment (NAT) of non-metastatic pancreas cancer in the hopes of improving negative margin rate, lymph node negativity, recurrence and survival. Even patients deemed resectable based on NCCN criteria are receiving NAT but data for these patients remains limited. This current study evaluated the outcomes of patients diagnosed with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified through the Mayo Clinic, Rochester SPORE pancreatic cancer registry as well as search of the electronic medical record via Advanced Cohort Explorer from May 2011 to 2016. Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments rendered, and outcomes were collected. Variables were analyzed for association with recurrence from time of surgery and survival from time of diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 520 patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified. 72 patients received upfront chemotherapy with 44 (61.1%) proceeding to surgical resection. 62 patients received upfront chemotherapy followed by radiation with 33 (53.2%) proceeding to surgical resection. 12 patients received upfront radiation alone with 7 (58.3%) proceeding to surgical resection. 374 patients did not receive any NAT with 293 (78.3%) proceeding to surgical resection. In total, 377 (72.5%) went to resection. Median time to recurrence from surgery was 27.7 months vs. 21.7 months for NAT and upfront resection, respectively (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.60-1.72, p = 0.48). Median overall survival from diagnosis for those receiving NAT was 40.6 months vs. 24.7 months for those receiving upfront resection (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.92, p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study shows an approximate 16 month improvement in overall survival of patients receiving upfront NAT for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This might be due to a better selection of patients. It also highlights that not all patients with resectable cancer undergo resection. Further studies are warranted to identify why resectable patients are not proceeding to resection and which specific NAT approaches benefit patients the most.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (S3) ◽  
pp. 965-965
Author(s):  
Amr I. Al Abbas ◽  
Mazen Zenati ◽  
Caroline J. Rieser ◽  
Ahmad Hamad ◽  
Jae Pil Jung ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Li Lian Kuan ◽  
Ashley R. Dennison ◽  
Giuseppe Garcea

Abstract Background The clinical significance of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN) in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unknown. The rate of detection on IPN has risen due to enhanced staging investigations to determine resectability. IPNs detected on preoperative imaging represent a clinical dilemma and complicate decision-making. Currently, there are no recommendations on the management of IPN. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on the natural history of IPN detected among patients with resectable PDAC. Methods A systematic review based on a search in Medline and Embase databases was performed. All clinical studies evaluating the significance of IPN in patients with resectable PDAC were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Results Five studies met the inclusion criteria. The total patient population was 761. The prevalence of IPN reported ranged from 18 to 71%. The median follow-up duration was 17 months. The median overall survival was 19 months. Patients with pre-operative IPN which subsequently progressed to clinically recognizable pulmonary metastases, ranged from 1.5 to 16%. Four studies found that there was no significant difference in median overall survival in patients with or without IPNs. Conclusion This is a first review on the significance of IPN in patients with resectable PDAC. The preoperative presence of IPN does not demonstrate an association with overall survival after surgery. The identification of IPN is a significant finding however it should not preclude patients with resectable PDAC from undergoing curative resection.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Jane Commander ◽  
Marcelo Cerullo ◽  
Harold J. Leraas ◽  
Christopher R. Reed ◽  
Meredith A. Achey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document