Should all pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) over 1 cm be resected?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4108-4108
Author(s):  
Diana Hsu ◽  
Sidney Le ◽  
Alex Chang ◽  
Austin Spitzer ◽  
George Kazantsev ◽  
...  

4108 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that represent 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. Their biologic behaviors are unpredictable with high grade, nodal metastasis, or liver metastasis lending an unfavorable prognosis. Current guidelines recommend resection for functioning tumors and those 2 cm or larger but are less straightforward regarding tumors < 2 cm in size. Previous data show that observation for nonfunctioning tumors < 2 cm can be safe and feasible; however, a significant portion of these patients may have nodal involvement or metastatic disease. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken to identify patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated at Northern California Kaiser Permanente (KP-NCAL) between February 2010 and December 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the log-rank test and Cox regression. Chi-squared test of relevant clinicopathologic factors determined which factors were predictive for overall survival (OS). Results: Mean age was 61 years in our cohort of 354 patients, with 29% over the age of 70. Mean tumor size was 3.43 cm; 32% of tumors were 2 cm or smaller. 51% of the patients had localized disease; 32% of the patients presented with metastatic disease. The pancreatic tail was the most common tumor location (38%), followed by the head of the pancreas (24%). On multivariate survival analysis, stage, location of the tumor, and surgical resection were statistically significant in terms of overall survival ( p<.001). Mean OS for patients with localized and metastatic disease was 93 months versus 37 months ( p<.001). Surgery was utilized in 8.9% of patients with metastatic disease ( p<.001). All patients with PNET smaller than 1 cm in our study group had localized disease only. However, in patients with tumor size between 1 and 2 cm, 11% had nodal or metastatic spread. Conclusions: PNETs are indolent but have malignant potential at any size. In our retrospective study, all of the patients with tumor size < 1 cm had localized disease. For those with PNETs 1-2 cm in size, 11% had nodal or metastatic spread. Based on our findings, we suggest a more aggressive surgical resection size criteria of 1 cm.[Table: see text]

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 401-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Alsidawi ◽  
Gustavo Figueiredo Marcondes Westin ◽  
Timothy J. Hobday ◽  
Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson

401 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are rare neoplasms comprising less than 2% of pancreatic tumors. Outcomes of PNETs vary by stage, grade, and clinical presentation. New therapies may have improved outcomes. We present an analysis of the epidemiology and prognosis of patients (pts) with PNETs evaluating a more recent period than previously reported. Methods: Using data from the SEER registry, we identified adults with PNETs between 2000 and 2013. Cases were identified using a combination of ICD-O-3 site and histology codes. The JMP and SEER*STAT 8.3.2 were used for statistical analysis. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The prognostic effect of variables was studied using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results: We identified 5993 pts with PNETs. Over the study duration, there was an increase in the annual incidence from 0.3 to 1.2 per 100.000. This was largely explained by the increase in number of pts with localized disease. The OS for the entire cohort was 54 months (95%; CI 50-58) and 5-year OS rates in localized, locally advanced and metastatic disease were 81.7%, 62% and 26% respectively. New therapies were increasingly implemented after 2008 such as sunitinib, everolimus and capecitabine/temozolomide. OS was better for pts diagnosed after 2008 (HR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.79; P < 0.0001) and this remained significant after excluding pts with localized disease (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P = 0.0002). Factors found to favorably affect OS included younger age, female sex, early stage, low grade, and surgery. In metastatic disease, pts who had surgery had better OS and this was significant after adjusting for possible confounders (HR 0.36; 95% CI, 0.3-0.45). Conclusions: In this large population-based study, we saw an increase in the annual incidence of PNETs mainly due to an increased number of pts with localized disease. The OS has improved over the study duration likely due to both stage migration and new therapies used in advanced disease. Younger age, female gender, low histologic grade, early stage and surgery were found to be factors that favorably affected survival. Surgery was found to be a predictor of better outcomes in metastatic disease.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 177-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Strosberg ◽  
A. Cheema ◽  
J. Weber ◽  
L. K. Kvols

177 Background: The AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7th edition, 2010) has introduced a novel TNM staging classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that is derived from the staging system for exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinomas. This classification has not yet been validated. Methods: Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center between 1999 and 2010 were assigned a stage (I-IV) based on the new AJCC classification. Overall survival from time of initial diagnosis was measured and statistical significance calculated using the log-rank test. The prognostic relevance of the AJCC staging classification was compared to the relevance of a staging classification proposed recently by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS). Results: 425 patients with histologically proven pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were identified. Both the novel AJCC classification and the ENETS classification were highly prognostic for survival (p<0.00001; Table). Conclusions: The novel AJCC 7th edition TNM classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is highly prognostic for overall survival and should be adopted in clinical practice. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-466
Author(s):  
Amir H. Fathi ◽  
Jonathan Romanyshyn ◽  
Mehdi Barati ◽  
Uzair Choudhury ◽  
Allen Chen ◽  
...  

Background Nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) are rare tumors with continued controversies in management. This study aims to identify demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics associated with aggressive behavior and survival. Methods The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients with NF-PNETs from 1988 to 2012. Multivariate regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to assess the impact of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics on tumor behavior and overall survival. Results In 1787 patients identified, size was a major determinant of aggressive behavior. The probability of aggressiveness increased 100% for tumor size ≥2 cm. For tumors ≥2 cm, every 1-cm increase in size was associated with an increase in probability of aggressive behavior by 11.3%. Patient age, tumor grade, and surgical resection were independent predictors of survival. Surgical resection was associated with improved survival but not grade I or II tumors with size <2 cm. Discussion Patient age, tumor size, and grade should be in the decision-making process around the surgical management of NF-PNETs. For tumors ≤2 cm with histologic grades of I or II, the probability of aggressive behavior is low, and surgical resection does not appear to afford survival benefit. Therefore, close observation could be justified.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii225-ii225
Author(s):  
Anupam Rishi ◽  
Homan Mohammadi ◽  
Daniela Martir ◽  
Eric Welsh ◽  
Timothy Robinson ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE Tumor-associated microglia and macrophages (TAMs) influence brain tumor biology and promote tumor-proliferating phenotype. Studies have shown these cell types predict outcomes in various tumor sites with limited evidence in high-grade gliomas (HGG). In this study, we assessed the presence of immune cell infiltrate (ICI) and overall survival (OS) in HGGs. METHODS A total of 97 consecutively treated patients with primary HGG with complete gene expression profiling were identified from our IRB-approved institutional tissue biorepository. Patients underwent primary surgical resection between 02/2004 and 03/2011. Gene expression levels were assessed by Affymetrix Hu-RSTA assays (Affymetrix; Santa Clara, CA). CIBERSORT estimated the presence of ICI via gene expression deconvolution. Tumor characteristics and the presence of 22 individual ICI subtypes were assessed with respect to OS. Time-to-event analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared via log-rank test. Associations between the ICI and outcomes were explored using Cox-regression. P&lt; 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Median follow-up from primary surgical resection was 12.8 months (range: 0.1-162.8), and median age was 58 years (20-85). Most patients were male (n=63; 65%) and had grade 4 tumors (n=71; 73%). OS differed by grade with 24-month actuarial OS rates of 81% and 34% (P&lt; 0.0001) for grade 3 and 4 gliomas, respectively. The presence of M0 (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.6; P=0.001), M1 (HR 1.8; 95%CI 1.1-2.9; P=0.01), and M2 macrophages (HR 1.9; 95%CI 1.2-3.2; P=0.007) predicted OS. No other ICI subtypes were predictive of OS. The presence of M0- and M2-polarized macrophages were more common in grade 4 compared to grade 3 gliomas 46% vs. 11% (P=0.002) and 69% vs. 31% (P=0.0007), respectively. CONCLUSION The increased presence of non-polarized or M2 TAMs within the glioma microenvironment was significantly associated with OS in HGG. Their presence may serve as unique stratification and a potential therapeutic target.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai-Shuai Xu ◽  
Hao Li ◽  
Tian-Jiao Li ◽  
Shuo Li ◽  
Huan-Yu Xia ◽  
...  

BackgroundExtracellular traps (ETs) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells can contribute to disease progression. The clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages and related extracellular traps in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of tumor infiltration and ET formation by neutrophils and macrophages in pNETs.MethodsA total of 135 patients with radical resection of nonfunctional pNETs were analyzed retrospectively. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were utilized to stain tumor tissue sections. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) of subgroups determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis was compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was established to predict 3-year RFS.ResultsPatients with high tumor-infiltrating neutrophils or macrophages or positive expression of neutrophils ETs or macrophage ETs displayed worse RFS (all p&lt;0.05). Moreover, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that neutrophil and macrophage infiltration and ETs were independent prognostic factors for RFS (all p&lt;0.05). A combined parameter including WHO grade, TNM stage, tumor-infiltrating neutrophils and macrophages, and neutrophil and macrophage ETs had the highest C-index (0.866) and lowest Akaike information criteria (326.557). The calibration plot of nomogram composed of the combined parameter exhibited excellent prognostic values for 3-year RFS.ConclusionsInfiltration and ETs by neutrophils and macrophages can be used as biological indicators of patient prognosis, suggesting the treatment potential for targeting those in nonfunctional pNETs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 855-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paige Finkelstein ◽  
Rishika Sharma ◽  
Omar Picado ◽  
Rahul Gadde ◽  
Heather Stuart ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talha Ayaz ◽  
Megna A. Panchbhavi ◽  
Muhammad T. Kashif ◽  
Mohammed S. Abdullah ◽  
Zahra Akhtar

AbstractBackgroundPrognosis in bone cancer patients with metastatic disease is believed to vary based on site/pattern of spread. In 2003, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) incorporated this observation into the TNM Staging System by subclassifying metastatic disease into M1a or M1b. We conducted a retrospective survival analysis of patients with primary bone cancer to characterize prognosis and assess outcomes in M1a versus M1b disease.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was searched for cases of primary bone cancer presenting with metastasis from 2010 to 2015. Cases were grouped using AJCC metastatic staging as metastasis to the lung only (M1a) or other pattern of metastasis (M1b). Overall survival and cause-specific survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate cox regression models. Multivariate models adjusted for multiple demographic, tumor characteristic, and treatment covariates.ResultsFive hundred and twenty-six cases met the inclusion criteria for this study. Two hundred and forty-eight were staged as M1a, and 278 were staged as M1b. Mean follow-up time for the cohort was 18.21 months (SD = 16.76). Fifty percent (124 of 248) of M1a and 59.4% (165 of 278) of M1b patients had died by the end of the study. Overall (P = .003) and cause-specific survival (P = .010) times were significantly lower for M1b patients via log-rank test. Adjusted analysis showed that M1b patients had poorer overall survival (HR, 1.505; 95% CI, 1.138-1.989; P = .004) and cause-specific survival (HR, 1.446; 95% CI, 1.091-1.918; P = .010) compared to M1a patients.ConclusionMetastasis pattern is an independent predictor of survival. M1a metastatic disease tends to have a better prognosis compared to M1b. This study supports the decision of the AJCC to subclassify metastatic disease for the purposes of staging and highlights the differences in prognosis between these two patterns of disease.


Sarcoma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Mark Brown ◽  
David Matichak ◽  
Kyla Rakoczy ◽  
John Groundland

Introduction. Osteosarcoma is the most common sarcoma of bone. Pelvic osteosarcoma presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to potential late symptom onset, metastatic dissemination at diagnosis, and inherent difficulties of wide surgical resection secondary to the complex and critical anatomy of the pelvis. The rates of survival are well reported for osteosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton, but specific details regarding presentation and survival are less known for osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was queried for primary osteosarcoma of the bony pelvis from 2004 to 2015. Cases with Collaborative Staging variables (available after 2004) were analyzed by grade, histologic subtype, surgical intervention, tumor size, tumor extension, and presence of metastasis at diagnosis. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were assessed with respect to these variables. The SEER database was then queried for age, tumor size, surgical intervention, metastasis at time of presentation, and survivorship data for patients with primary osteosarcoma of the upper extremity, lower extremity, vertebrae, thorax, and face/skull, and rates for all anatomic locations were then compared to patients with primary pelvic osteosarcoma. Results. A total of 292 cases of pelvic osteosarcoma were identified from 2004 to 2015 within the database, representing 9.8% of cases among all surveyed primary sites. The most common histologic subtype was osteoblastic osteosarcoma (69.9%), followed by chondroblastic osteosarcoma (22.3%). The majority of cases were high-grade tumors (94.3%), of size >8 cm (72.0%), and with extension beyond the originating bone (74.0%). For the entire pelvic osteosarcoma group, the 2-, 5-, 10-year survival rates were 45.6%, 26.5%, and 21.4%, respectively, which were the poorest among surveyed anatomic sites. The 5-year overall survival was an abysmal 5.3% for patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 37.0% for non-metastatic pelvic osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy. When compared to other locations, pelvic osteosarcoma had higher rates of metastatic disease at presentation (33.5%), larger median tumor size (11.0 cm), and older median age at diagnosis (47.5 years). While over 85% of patients with tumors at the extremities received surgery, only 47.4% of pelvic osteosarcomas in this cohort received surgical resection—likely influenced by larger tumor size, sacral involvement, frequency of metastasis, older age, or delayed referral to a sarcoma center. Conclusion. This study clarifies presenting features and clinical outcomes of pelvic osteosarcomas, which often present with large, high-grade tumors with extracompartmental extension, high likelihood of metastatic disease at diagnosis, and a potential limited ability to be addressed surgically. The survival rates of primary osteosarcoma of the pelvis are poor and are lower than osteosarcomas from other anatomic locations. While acknowledging the influence of metastasis, tumor characteristics, and advanced age on the decision to undergo surgical excision of a pelvic osteosarcoma, the rates of surgical resection are low and highlight the importance of understanding appropriate conditions for oncologic resection of pelvic sarcomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document