Single institutional analysis of resectable pancreatic cancer.

706 Background: In recent years, there has been a shift towards neo-adjuvant treatment (NAT) of non-metastatic pancreas cancer in the hopes of improving negative margin rate, lymph node negativity, recurrence and survival. Even patients deemed resectable based on NCCN criteria are receiving NAT but data for these patients remains limited. This current study evaluated the outcomes of patients diagnosed with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Patients were retrospectively identified through the Mayo Clinic, Rochester SPORE pancreatic cancer registry as well as search of the electronic medical record via Advanced Cohort Explorer from May 2011 to 2016. Baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments rendered, and outcomes were collected. Variables were analyzed for association with recurrence from time of surgery and survival from time of diagnosis using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 520 patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified. 72 patients received upfront chemotherapy with 44 (61.1%) proceeding to surgical resection. 62 patients received upfront chemotherapy followed by radiation with 33 (53.2%) proceeding to surgical resection. 12 patients received upfront radiation alone with 7 (58.3%) proceeding to surgical resection. 374 patients did not receive any NAT with 293 (78.3%) proceeding to surgical resection. In total, 377 (72.5%) went to resection. Median time to recurrence from surgery was 27.7 months vs. 21.7 months for NAT and upfront resection, respectively (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.60-1.72, p = 0.48). Median overall survival from diagnosis for those receiving NAT was 40.6 months vs. 24.7 months for those receiving upfront resection (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.92, p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study shows an approximate 16 month improvement in overall survival of patients receiving upfront NAT for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This might be due to a better selection of patients. It also highlights that not all patients with resectable cancer undergo resection. Further studies are warranted to identify why resectable patients are not proceeding to resection and which specific NAT approaches benefit patients the most.

Download Full-text

Prognostic value of leukemia inhibitory factor and its receptor in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Future Oncology ◽

10.2217/fon-2019-0684 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 16 (3) ◽

pp. 4461-4473 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Dong Wang ◽

Kun Liu ◽

Yingchi Yang ◽

Tingting Wang ◽

Quan Rao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽

Leukemia Inhibitory Factor ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Adjusted Hazard Ratio ◽

Inhibitory Factor ◽

Normal Tissues ◽

Kaplan Meier

Currently, the prognostic effects of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and LIF receptor (LIFR) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) are not clear. In the present study, we utilized the large datasets from four public databases to investigate the expression of LIF and LIFR and their clinical significance in PAAD. Eight cohorts containing 1278 cases with PAAD were identified and the analysis results suggested that LIF was highly expressed while LIFR was lowly expressed in PAAD tissues compared with adjacent or normal tissues. Kaplan–Meier plot curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses indicated high LIF expression was associated with shorter overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.641, 95% CI: 1.399–1.925, p < 0.001) whereas high LIFR expression was associated with longer overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.653, 95% CI: 0.517–0.826, p < 0.001).

Download Full-text

Predictors of survival after metastasectomy of oligometastatic recurrence following gastroesophageal cancer treatment.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e16060 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e16060-e16060

Author(s):

Malcolm MacKenzie ◽

Lucy Xiaolu Ma ◽

Osvaldo Epsin-Garcia ◽

Chihiro Suzuki ◽

Yvonne Bach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

P Value ◽

Curative Intent ◽

Term Survival ◽

Time To Recurrence ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Isolated Lung

e16060 Background: Recurrent gastroesophageal (GE) carcinomas carry a poor prognosis and are usually treated with palliative chemotherapy (CTX). However, recent studies suggest that certain patients with oligometastatic recurrence can have long term survival after metastasectomy. Appropriate patient selection for metastasectomy remains a challenge, as few predictors of overall survival (OS) after metastasectomy have been identified. Our primary aim was to identify predictors of OS following metastasectomy in GE cancers. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of GE cancer patients treated from 2007 to 2015 using the Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Registry. We included patients who underwent curative-intent surgery or definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for localized GE cancer who then had single organ recurrence treated with metastasectomy. The probability of OS from date of recurrence was estimated with the Kaplan Meier method. Predictors of OS after metastasectomy for isolated recurrence were determined using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Covariates included time to recurrence (interval from curative-intent surgery or completion of definitive CRT), site of recurrence (lung/non-lung), sex, age and race (Asian/Non-Asian). Within the multivariable model, predictors with a p-value less than 0.05 were deemed significant. Results: Of 44 patients, median age was 58 years (28-78), and 59% were male. Primary sites were: esophagus 25%, GE junction 41% and gastric 34%. Treatment of the primary was: surgery alone 13%, surgery and (neo)adjuvant CTX 76%, and CRT 11%. Recurrent sites were brain 22%, ovary 20%, lung 18%, bone 7%, adrenals 7%, liver 7%, distant lymph node 6%, and other 13%. The median follow up time was 38.9 months. The 1, 3 and 5-year (yr) OS following metastasectomy were 79% (95% CI 68-92%), 40% (27-58%) and 28% (16-49%). Univariable analysis revealed that time to recurrence greater than 1 yr (HR=0.45 95% CI 0.21-0.93, p=0.032) and lung site recurrence (HR=0.16 95% CI 0.04-0.67, p=0.012) were associated with longer OS. On multivariable analysis, only lung site recurrence was significant (HR=0.12 95% CI 0.03-0.54, p=0.0056). The 1, 3 and 5-yr OS for patients after resection of isolated lung recurrence were 100% (95% CI 100-100%), 86% (63-100%) and 69% (40-100%). Conclusions: In our study, patients with isolated pulmonary recurrences demonstrated prolonged overall survival following metastasectomy. These patients could be considered for resection following recurrence of GE cancer. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Association of low RKIP expression with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3068 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3068-3068

Author(s):

Lingbin Meng ◽

Rui Ji ◽

Damian A. Laber ◽

Xuebo Yan ◽

Xiaochun Xu

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Tumor Size ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Tnm Stage ◽

Erk Signaling ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Proportional Hazards Regression ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Nsclc Patients

3068 Background: Raf1 kinase inhibitor protein (RKIP) is able to bind Raf1 to inhibit Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK signaling, a major oncogenic pathway. It has been reported that reduced RKIP expression associates with poor prognosis in many cancers, including gastric adenocarcinoma, gliomas and bladder cancer. However, there are only several studies on its role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the conclusion is still controversial. Hence, we performed this study to assess the prognostic significance of RKIP in our NSCLC population. Methods: Between June 2017 and June 2020, 156 NSCLC patients treated at our hospital were included for the present study. None of the patients had received chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery before. Their tumor tissues and surrounding normal lung tissues were collected for immunostain and western blot analysis of RKIP expression and ERK signaling. We collected information about gender, age, histological differentiation, tumor size, TNM stage, and lymph node status. Survival curves were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic value of various variables in a univariate and multivariate setting. Results: Immunostain and western blot results showed a lower RKIP expression and a higher p-ERK level in cancer tissues compared with the surrounding normal tissues. A reduced RKIP expression with high level of p-ERK was also observed in TNM stages III and IV as compared with I and II. Pearson's chi-squared test confirmed low RKIP expression associated with poorer TNM stage ( p< 0.001) and N-stage ( p< 0.05). No significant correlation was observed between RKIP expression level and gender, age, histological type or tumor size. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients with low RKIP expression had significantly worse overall survival than patients with high RKIP expression ( p= 0.019, log-rank). This conclusion was consistent in the stage I&II patients ( p= 0.011, log-rank) but not in the stage III&IV patients ( p= 0.711, log-rank). Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated Tumor size, TNM stage and RKIP expression significantly affected overall survival of the NSCLC patients. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed RKIP expression remained a significant predictor of survival after correcting for the effects of Tumor size and TNM stage (hazard ratio = 1.730, 95% confidence interval = 1.017 – 2.942, p = 0.043). Conclusions: In this study, low RKIP expression was a poor prognostic indicator in NSCLC as it significantly correlated with poorer TNM stage, N-status, and overall survival. Our findings suggest that by inhibiting Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathway RKIP may play an anti-tumor role in NSCLC.

Download Full-text

Surgery for elderly patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, a comparison with non-surgical treatments: a retrospective study outcomes of resectable pancreatic cancer

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-019-6255-3 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Hyeong Min Park ◽

Sang-Jae Park ◽

Sung-Sik Han ◽

Seoung Hoon Kim

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Surgical Resection ◽

Charlson Comorbidity Index ◽

Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Surgery Group ◽

Comorbidity Index ◽

High Charlson Comorbidity Index

Abstract Background We designed a retrospective study to compare prognostic outcomes based on whether or not surgical resection was performed in elderly patients aged(≥75 years) with resectable pancreatic cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (surgery group, resection was performed for 38 cases; no surgery group, resection was not performed for 11 cases) diagnosed from January 2003 to December 2014 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. Results There was no significant difference in demographics between the two groups. The surgery group showed significantly better overall survival after diagnosis than the no surgery group (2-year survival rate, 40.7% vs. 0%; log-rank test, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed that not having undergone surgical resection [hazard ratio (HR) 2.412, P = 0.022] and a high Charlson comorbidity index (HR 5.252, P = 0.014) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival in elderly patients with early stage pancreatic cancer. Conclusions In the present study, surgical resection resulted in better prognosis than non-surgical resection for elderly patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Except for patients with a high Charlson comorbidity index, an aggressive surgical approach seems to be beneficial for elderly patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Download Full-text

Comparison of survival rates in carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with total mastectomy to breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.519 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 519-519 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

M. N. Ibrahim ◽

Z. Abdullah ◽

L. Healy ◽

C. Murphy ◽

I. Y. Yousif ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Breast Conserving Surgery ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Disease Specific Survival ◽

Total Mastectomy ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Disease Specific

519 Background: Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the breast is a precancerous lesion with the potential to progress to invasive cancer. In 2003, CIS accounted for 19% of all newly diagnosed invasive and non-invasive breast lesions combined in the United States. Current treatment options are mastectomy ± tamoxifen, and breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy ± tamoxifen. As there are no randomized comparisons of these 2 treatments, data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to compare their survival rates. Methods: 88,285 patients were identified with CIS from 1988 - 2003. Of these, 27,728 patients were treated with a total mastectomy, and 25,240 patients received breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare overall survival and disease specific survival at 5 and 10 years. Results: Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated 5 year overall survival rates for total mastectomy vs. breast conserving surgery with radiotherapy of 95.46% vs. 97.59% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). The 5 year rates for disease specific survival were 99.16% vs. 99.72% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). At 10 years the overall survival rates had fallen to 91.96% vs. 96.09% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). The 10 year disease specific survival rates were 98.61% vs. 99.50% respectively (Log-rank P < 0.0001). Cox proportional hazards regression demonstrated a relative risk of 0.847 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.790 - 0.907) and 1.110 (95% CI 0.931 - 1.324) for 5 year overall survival and disease specific survival respectively, when total mastectomy was compared with breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. At 10 years, the relative risks were 0.865 (95% CI 0.820 - 0.913) and 1.035 (95% CI 0.900 - 1.190) for overall survival and disease specific survival respectively. Conclusions: Overall, when looking at disease-specific survival rates by multi-variate analysis, there does not appear to be a significant difference between total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy in the treatment of CIS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Association between radiographic response and overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.7_suppl.118 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 118-118

Author(s):

G. Sonpavde ◽

G. R. Pond ◽

W. R. Berry ◽

R. De Wit ◽

M. A. Eisenberger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prostate Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Objective Assessment ◽

Objective Response ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Castration Resistant ◽

Kaplan Meier

118 Background: In men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC),the association of measurable tumor responses with overall survival (OS) is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the TAX327 phase III trial to study this relationship. Methods: Eligible patients for this analysis included those with WHO-defined measurable metastatic disease randomized to receive either docetaxel or mitoxantrone. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the prognostic relationship of WHO-defined radiologic response with OS was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Landmark analyses evaluated survival from baseline and 2, 3, 4 and 6 months after baseline. Results: Four hundred and twelve patients enrolled on the TAX327 trial had measurable tumors. Thirty-seven patients exhibited a complete or partial objective response (CR/PR, 9.0%), 116 had stable disease (SD, 28.2%), 99 had progressive disease (PD,24%) and 160 (38.8%) did not have a post-baseline objective assessment. Partial responders demonstrated longer median OS (29.0 months) than patients with SD (22.1 months), or those with PD (10.8 months) or those who were not assessed (12.7 months). These results remained after landmark analysis. We found a significant association between ≥30% PSA declines and radiologic response, with ≥30% PSA declines occurring in all patients with CR/PR, 79.8% of patients with SD and 34.4% with PD. Radiologic response remained a significant but modest post-treatment prognostic factor for OS after adjusting for treatment, pain-response and ≥30% PSA-decline (p=0.009). Conclusions: In men with metastatic CRPC and measurable disease receiving chemotherapy, objective tumor response was prognostic for OS, and appears to complement PSA assessment. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Clinical features and outcomes of secondary somatic malignancy (SSM) arising from teratoma in late relapse germ cell tumor (GCT).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.7_suppl.518 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽

pp. 518-518

Author(s):

Nathan Colin Wong ◽

Shawn Dason ◽

Lucas W. Dean ◽

Sumit Isharwal ◽

Mark Donoghue ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Median Time ◽

Surgical Resection ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Late Relapse ◽

Hazards Model ◽

Kaplan Meier

518 Background: Late relapse (>2 years) GCT is associated with an increased rate of SSM. We report our experience with SSM in the setting of late relapse and determine predictors of overall survival (OS). Methods: From 1985 to 2018, 46 patients with GCT and SSM at late relapse were identified. Clinical and pathologic parameters were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS from time of relapse and a Cox proportional hazards model to assess predictors of OS. Results: Of 46 men (44 testicular primary, 2 mediastinal primary), median time to late relapse with SSM was 10.4 years (range, 2.3 - 38.1). Most (n=27, 59%) were symptomatic at presentation but 11 were detected by elevated tumor markers (AFP 8, HCG 2, both 1) and 8 by surveillance imaging. SSMs were adenocarcinoma (25), sarcoma (14), poorly differentiated neoplasm (3), Wilms (2), PNET (1) and glioma (1). Median time to relapse was longer for adenocarcinoma vs other histotypes of SSM (14.6 vs 4.1 years, p < 0.001). The initial site of relapse was the retroperitoneum (RP, 26), pelvis (7), lung (6), retrocrural space (3), mediastinum (2), neck (1) and duodenum (1). Only 10 of 26 men with late relapse in the RP had undergone prior RPLND (all at outside institutions; variable templates) with histology in 7/10 showing teratoma. The other 16 men had received chemotherapy only (8), orchiectomy only for stage I (3), RPLND aborted due to cardiac arrest (1), and unknown (4). All 46 late relapses were managed with surgical resection; 26 also received chemotherapy (16 SSM-directed, 10 GCT-directed). Overall, 12 patients died and the median OS was 14.2 years. On univariable analysis, symptomatic presentation (HR = 3.1), SSM at multiple sites (HR = 3.9), extra-RP disease (HR: 3.9), and incomplete/no resection of SSM (HR = 3.6) predicted mortality. On multivariable analysis, only extra-RP disease was independently associated with inferior OS (5-year OS, 82 vs 52%, p = 0.017). Conclusions: SSM is an important potential complication of late relapse GCT and seems to be associated with the lack of resection of retroperitoneal metastases. Early identification and complete surgical resection prior to SSM arising in extra-RP sites is critical to optimizing outcomes.

Download Full-text

Impact of Prior Cancer History on Outcomes in Thymoma

10.21203/rs.3.rs-41041/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shilong Wu ◽

Mengyang Liu ◽

Weixue Cui ◽

Guilin Peng ◽

Jianxing He

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Cancer History ◽

Treatment Methods ◽

Hazards Model ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Thymoma is an uncommon intrathoracic malignant tumor and has a long natural history. It is uncertain whether the survival of thymoma patient is affected by prior cancer history. Finding out the impact of a prior cancer history on thymoma survival has important implications for both decision making and research. Method The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for thymoma patients diagnosed between 1975 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze overall survival across a variety of stages, age, and treatment methods with a prior cancer history or not. Results A total of 3604 patients with thymoma were identified including 507 (14.1%) with a prior cancer history. The 10-year survival rate of patients with a prior cancer history (53.8%) was worse than those without a prior cancer history (40.32%, 95%CI 35.24-45.33, P < 0.0001). However, adjusted analyses showed that the impact of a prior cancer history was heterogenous across age and treatment methods. In subset analyses, prior cancer history was associated with worse survival among patients who were treated with chemoradiotherapy (HR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.51-5.20, P = 0.001) and age ≤ 65 years (HR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.02-1.73, P = 0.036). Conclusions Prior cancer history provides an inferior overall survival for patients with thymoma. But it does not worsen the survival in some subgroups and these thymoma patients should not be excluded from clinical trials.

Download Full-text

Value of surgical resection and timing of therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer at high risk for positive margins

ESMO Open ◽

10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000282 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. e000282 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Anna Torgeson ◽

Ignacio Garrido-Laguna ◽

Randa Tao ◽

George M Cannon ◽

Courtney L Scaife ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Surgical Resection ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Clinical Stage ◽

Positive Margin ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Stage Iii ◽

Term Survival ◽

Additional Therapy ◽

Margin Positive

BackgroundSurgical resection remains the best chance at long-term survival in pancreatic cancer, though margin-positive resections are associated with diminished survival. We examined the effect of margin-positive resection on survival, as well as the role and timing of additional therapies through the National Cancer Database (NCDB).Patients and methodsPatients with stage IIA–III pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2004 to 2013 were identified in NCDB. Survival was compared using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling for patients who underwent surgery with negative (R0), microscopically positive (R1) and macroscopically positive (R2) margins or non-surgical treatment. We further analysed patients by margin status, timing of additional therapy (neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) vs adjuvant therapy (AT) vs none) and clinical stage.ResultsWe analysed 44 852 patients. Median survival (MS) for patients who did not undergo surgery was 10.3 months, compared with 19.7 months for R0 (P<0.001), 14.3 months for R1 (P<0.001) and 9.8 months (P=0.07) for R2 resections. NAT (MS 23.2 months) was associated with improved survival compared with AT (MS 21.5 months) in negative-margin patients and equivalent (MS 17.6 months) to AT (MS 16.8 months) in positive-margin patients. Survival for stage III NAT positive-margin patients (MS 19.8 months) was equivalent to AT after negative margins (MS 18.4 months, P=1.00). Improved R0 rates were seen with NAT (88% vs 81%, P<0.001), especially in stage III patients (85% vs 59%, P<0.001).ConclusionR1 resections portend poorer survival than R0 but do not negate the benefit of surgery when additional therapy is given. NAT was associated with improved R0 rates and improved survival for stage III positive-margin patients.

Download Full-text

Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase and the overall survival of metastatic pancreatic cancer

10.21203/rs.2.10892/v3 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Yuanyuan Xiao ◽

Haijun Yang ◽

Jian Lu ◽

Dehui Li ◽

Chuanzhi Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽

Gamma Glutamyltransferase ◽

Cancer Occurrence ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

Adequate Evaluation ◽

Underlying Mechanisms

Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests that Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) may be involved in cancer occurrence and progression. However, the prognostic role of serum GGT in pancreatic cancer (PC) survival lacks adequate evaluation. In this study, we aimed to analyze the association between serum GGT measured at diagnosis and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic PC. Methods: We identified 320 patients with histopathologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) diagnosed during 2015 and 2016 at a specialized cancer hospital in southwestern China. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine associations between serum GGT and OS in metastatic PDAC. Results: Controlled for possible confounding factors, serum GGT was significantly associated with OS: serum GGT >48 U/L yielded a hazard ratio of 1.53 (95%CI: 1.19-1.97) for mortality risk. A significant dose-response association between serum GGT and OS was also observed. Subgroup analysis showed a possible interaction between GGT and blood glucose level. Conclusion: Serum GGT could be a potential indicator of survival in metastatic PDAC patients. Underlying mechanisms for this association should be investigated.

Download Full-text