Thymic carcinoma: A cohort study of prognostic factors after surgical resection from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7602-7602
Author(s):  
Enrico Ruffini ◽  
Frank C. Detterbeck ◽  
Dirk Van Raemdonck ◽  
Gaetano Rocco ◽  
Pascal Alexandre Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
European Society ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Rare Tumors ◽  
Thymic Carcinomas

7602 Background: Thymic carcinomas are rare tumors which have recently been separated from thymomas due to their different histologic/clinical characteristics. Most of the current literature is composed of small series spanned over extended time periods Methods: The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) developed a retrospective database collecting data on patients with thymic tumors submitted to surgery (1990-2011). Out of 2,265 incident cases, there were 229 thymic carcinomas. Clinical-pathologic characteristics were analyzed including age, gender, stage (Masaoka), histologic subtypes (squamous cell/others), type of resection (complete/incomplete), tumor size, induction and adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy-ChT/radiotherapy-RT), recurrence. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS) and the cumulative incidence of recurrence. Survival analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate (Cox-shared frailty) competing-risk models. Missing data were analysed using multiple-imputation techniques Results: A multidisciplinary approach (surgery, ChT and RT) was used in most patients. Induction therapy was employed in 78 patients (ChT, 53; ChT/RT 23; RT, 2). Adjuvant therapy was employed in 150 patients (ChT, 19; ChT/RT, 72; RT, 59). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 71% of the patients. Five and 10-year OS were 60% and 35%. Five and 10-year DFS were 62% and 43%. Cumulative incidence of recurrence was 0.25, 0.32 and 0.40 at 3, 5, and 10 years. Independent OS predictors (multivariate analysis) were young age (p=0.006), stage I/II (vs. III/IV, p=0.02), R0 resection (p<0.001), adjuvant therapy (ChT, RT or both) (p=0.02). Independent predictor of recurrence (univariate analysis) was tumor size (p=0.05). Conclusions: In thymic carcinomas submitted to surgical resection, increased age,Masaoka stages III-IV and incomplete resection had a significant impact in worsening survival. Larger tumors had an increased risk of recurrence. The administration of adjuvant ChT or RT was associated with improved overall survival. A multidisciplinary approach to these rare tumors remains essential.

Surgical Outcomes and Risk Analysis of Primary Pulmonary Sarcoma

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshito Yamada ◽  
Tevfik Kaplan ◽  
Alex Soltermann ◽  
Isabelle Schmitt-Opitz ◽  
Didier Schneiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Lung Neoplasm ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Pathological Grade ◽  
Pathological Stage ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Advanced Pathological Stage ◽  
Pulmonary Sarcoma

Background Primary pulmonary sarcoma (PPS) is a rare malignant lung neoplasm, and there is very little medical evidence about treatment of PPS. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcome of patients who underwent surgical resection for PPS. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent surgical resection for PPS in our institution between 1995 and 2014. Cases who only underwent biopsy were excluded. Results A total of 24 patients (18 males, 6 females), with a median age of 60 (interquartile range: 44–67) years, were analyzed. The surgical procedures performed in these patients were pneumonectomy (n = 10), lobectomy (n = 11), and wedge resection (n = 3). Complete resection was achieved in 16 patients. The pathological stages (tumor, node, metastases lung cancer classification, 8th edition) of the patients were I (n = 4), II (n = 12), III (n = 2), and IV (n = 5), and there were four cases of lymph node metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rate of the patients was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29–72). Adverse prognostic factors for overall survival were incomplete resection (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.1–42), advanced pathological stage (HR 14, 95% CI: 2.8–66), higher pathological grade (HR 4.5, 95% CI: 1.2–17), and tumor size ≥ 7 cm (HR 4.7, 95% CI: 1.1–21). Conclusions Our series of PPS revealed that incomplete resection, advanced pathological stage, higher pathological grade, and tumor size were unfavorable factors for long-term survival.

The Natural History of Resected Pancreatic Cancer without Adjuvant Chemotherapy

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 480-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Hernandez ◽  
Connor A. Morton ◽  
Sam Al-Saadi ◽  
Desireé Villadolid ◽  
Jennifer Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Ajcc Stage ◽  
Disease Free

Diagnostic imaging, surgical care, and perioperative morbidity and mortality have significantly improved for patients undergoing resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was undertaken to define the natural history and patterns of recurrence of resected pancreatic cancer without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies using current standards of care. Sixty-one patients underwent pancreatectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Tumors were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification system. CT scans were obtained every 3 months and recurrence categorized as: liver only, local, distant, multiple sites, or clinical. Median survival after pancreatectomy was 12 months. Cancer recurred in 51 (84%) patients. The radiographic site of initial recurrence did not generally impact survival; patients initially recurring at multiple sites had significantly abbreviated median survival of 5.6 months. AJCC stage was found to correlate with disease-free and overall survival, although tumor size alone did not. The presence of lymphatic metastasis correlated with disease-free but not overall survival. Overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains poor in the absence of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. AJCC stage is the best predictor of disease-free and overall survival; tumor size, lymph node status, and site of recurrence alone do not impact survival in a meaningful way.

scholarly journals Analysis of tumor size enhances predictive power of CA19-9 for overall survival following surgical resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S552-S553
Author(s):  
S. Said ◽  
B. Perlmutter ◽  
J. McMichael ◽  
C. Barrows ◽  
J. Scheman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Predictive Power

Role of adjuvant therapy in resected gallbladder cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 452-452
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abdelrahim Muddathir Hassan ◽  
Nicha Wongjarupong ◽  
Cristobal T. Sanhueza ◽  
Mindy L. Hartgers ◽  
Fatima Hassan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Gallbladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

452 Background: Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for patients with gallbladder cancer, despite surgical advances many patients ultimately develop recurrent disease. Management of resected gallbladder cancer mostly relies on single-arm trials and retrospective observations. The purpose of our study is to assess the role of adjuvant therapy in stage I-III gallbladder cancer patients who have undergone surgical resection. Methods: Clinical data were collected on 251 patients who underwent surgical resection for stage I-III gallbladder cancer and presented to Mayo clinic from January 2000-December 2015. Patients were then classified into adjuvant treatment group and surveillance only group. Overall survival and recurrence were compared between the two groups. Results: 78 (31.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy while 173 patients were observed only. Patients who received adjuvant tended to be younger (63.0[SD 11] vs 66.2 [SD 13.1]), have higher stage, and underwent extended surgery. Most patients received chemoradiotherapy (55) with 5-Fluorouracil (67.3%) and capecitabine (25.5%) as radiosensitizing agents. 21 patients received additional adjuvant chemotherapy. 27% of patients received chemotherapy as the sole adjuvant treatment. The most common chemo regimens included gemcitabine (52.3%) and gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination (23.8%). On multivariate analysis patients > 65 years(HR 1.53 [1.07-2.19], p = 0.02), males (HR 1.7 [1.2-2.4], p = 0.003), positive margins (2.77 [1.69-4.38], p < 0.01), and stage III (HR 1.91 [1.35-2.70], p < 0.01) had worse overall survival. Patients who underwent extended radical resection (HR 0.73 [0.51-1.05], p = 0.09) had better overall survival. Adjuvant therapy had no statistical significant effect on overall survival (HR 1.10 [0.75-1.59], p = 0.63 or disease free survival (HR 1.05 [0.69-1.59], p = 0.81) on overall population. However, in stage IIIB, patients receiving adjuvant therapy had better overall survival (HR 0.51 [0.25-1.01], p = 0.05) and disease free survival (HR 0.45 [0.19-1.09], p = 0.06). Conclusions: In our study, adjuvant treatment, especially chemoradiation therapy, was only beneficial in patients with stage IIIb gallbladder cancer patients.

Should all pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) over 1 cm be resected?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4108-4108
Author(s):  
Diana Hsu ◽  
Sidney Le ◽  
Alex Chang ◽  
Austin Spitzer ◽  
George Kazantsev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Metastatic Spread ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Localized Disease

4108 Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that represent 1-2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. Their biologic behaviors are unpredictable with high grade, nodal metastasis, or liver metastasis lending an unfavorable prognosis. Current guidelines recommend resection for functioning tumors and those 2 cm or larger but are less straightforward regarding tumors < 2 cm in size. Previous data show that observation for nonfunctioning tumors < 2 cm can be safe and feasible; however, a significant portion of these patients may have nodal involvement or metastatic disease. Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken to identify patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated at Northern California Kaiser Permanente (KP-NCAL) between February 2010 and December 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed with the log-rank test and Cox regression. Chi-squared test of relevant clinicopathologic factors determined which factors were predictive for overall survival (OS). Results: Mean age was 61 years in our cohort of 354 patients, with 29% over the age of 70. Mean tumor size was 3.43 cm; 32% of tumors were 2 cm or smaller. 51% of the patients had localized disease; 32% of the patients presented with metastatic disease. The pancreatic tail was the most common tumor location (38%), followed by the head of the pancreas (24%). On multivariate survival analysis, stage, location of the tumor, and surgical resection were statistically significant in terms of overall survival ( p<.001). Mean OS for patients with localized and metastatic disease was 93 months versus 37 months ( p<.001). Surgery was utilized in 8.9% of patients with metastatic disease ( p<.001). All patients with PNET smaller than 1 cm in our study group had localized disease only. However, in patients with tumor size between 1 and 2 cm, 11% had nodal or metastatic spread. Conclusions: PNETs are indolent but have malignant potential at any size. In our retrospective study, all of the patients with tumor size < 1 cm had localized disease. For those with PNETs 1-2 cm in size, 11% had nodal or metastatic spread. Based on our findings, we suggest a more aggressive surgical resection size criteria of 1 cm.[Table: see text]

The Role of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Therapy for Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Propensity Score Matched Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 000313482095482
Author(s):  
Kimberly Linden ◽  
Atlee Melillo ◽  
John Gaughan ◽  
Chioma Obinero ◽  
Alec Kellish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Duodenal Adenocarcinoma

Introduction Adjuvant therapy is recommended in duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA), but the role of neoadjuvant therapy remains undefined. We compared the effect of neoadjuvant therapy to adjuvant therapy on overall survival, 30-day, and 90-day mortality following the resection of DA. Methods A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database was performed on patients with DA who received either adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in addition to surgical resection. Propensity score matching was done for patient, socioeconomic, and tumor characteristics. Overall survival, 30-day, and 90-day mortality were compared. Results A total of 112 patients were identified; 55 received adjuvant therapy; 57 received neoadjuvant therapy. There was no difference in 30-day (0% vs. 1.75%; P = 1.00), 90-day mortality (1.82% vs. 7.02%; P = .36), nor overall survival (1 yr: 86% vs. 76; 3 yr: 49% vs. 46%; 5 yr: 42% vs. 39%; P = .28). Conclusions There was no difference in overall survival after propensity score matched analysis.

scholarly journals Differences in the Prognostic Value of Tumor Extent of Resection among the Molecular Subgroups of Medulloblastoma: A Single Centre Study of 113 Cases

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
Yuyuan Wang ◽  
Kay Kawai Li ◽  
Ji Xiong ◽  
Zhenyu Zhang ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Chinese Population ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Molecular Subgroups ◽  
Tumor Extent

Medulloblastoma (MB) is one of the most common pediatrics malignant tumors of the central nervous system. Studies in America and Europe have demonstrated significant differences in the prognostic value of medulloblastoma extent among molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma. However, studies focusing on the Chinese population are still lacking. A total of 113 patients with medulloblastoma who underwent surgical resection in Huashan Hospital between January 2002 and December 2013 were included in this study. Histological diagnoses were confirmed by 2 or more pathologists. Immunohistochemistry and CTNNB1 exon 3 mutation analysis were used to determine the different subgroups. Complete or incomplete resection was defined based on surgeons' reports and confirmed by postoperative computer tomography (CT). In this study, we included 113 patients with medulloblastoma (13 with WNT subgroup, 18 with SHH subgroup, and 82 with non-SHH/WNT subgroups) to assess their event-free and overall survival. We identified event-free survival and overall survival benefit for complete resection over incomplete resection. We found that for patients with NON-SHH/WNT medulloblastoma, incomplete resection was significantly associated with progression and overall survival compared with complete resection. To our best knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate the prognostic value of tumor extent of resection among the molecular subgroups of 113 medulloblastoma in the Chinese population. The prognostic benefit of the increased extent of resection for patients with medulloblastoma is attenuated after the molecular subgroups are taken into account. We still need further study to assess the benefit of surgical resection of small residual portions.

scholarly journals The landscape of gene mutations and clinical significance of tumor mutation burden in patients with soft tissue sarcoma who underwent surgical resection and received conventional adjuvant therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
Li-Bin Xu ◽  
Zhen-Guo Zhao ◽  
Song-Feng Xu ◽  
Xin-Xin Zhang ◽  
Ting Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Tumor Mutation Burden ◽  
Mutation Burden

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the landscape of gene mutations and the clinical significance of tumor mutation burden (TMB) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma who underwent surgical resection and received conventional adjuvant therapy. Methods A total of 68 patients with soft tissue sarcoma were included. Postoperative tumor tissue specimens from the patients were collected for DNA extraction. Targeted next-generation sequencing of cancer-relevant genes was performed for the detection of gene mutations and the analysis of TMB. Univariate analysis between TMB status and prognosis was carried out using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and multivariate analysis was adjusted by the Cox regression model. Results No specific genetic mutations associated with soft tissue sarcoma were found. The mutation frequency of TP53, PIK3C2G, NCOR1, and KRAS of the 68 patients with soft tissue sarcoma were observed in 19 cases (27.94%), 15 cases (22.06%), 14 cases (20.59%), and 14 cases (20.59%), respectively. With regard to the analysis of TMB, the overall TMB of the 68 patients with soft tissue sarcoma was relatively low (median: 2.05 per Mb (range: 0∼15.5 per Mb)). Subsequently, TMB status was divided into TMB-Low and TMB-Middle according to the median TMB. Patients with TMB-Low and TMB-Middle were 37 cases (54.41%) and 31 cases (45.59%), respectively. Overall survival analysis indicated that the median overall survival of patients with TMB-Low and TMB-Middle was not reached, and 4.5 years, respectively ( P=0.015). Conclusion This study characterizes the genetic background of patients with STS soft tissue sarcoma. The TMB was of clinical significance for patients with soft tissue sarcoma who underwent surgical resection and received conventional adjuvant therapy.

scholarly journals Osteosarcoma of the Pelvis: Clinical Presentation and Overall Survival

Sarcoma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Mark Brown ◽  
David Matichak ◽  
Kyla Rakoczy ◽  
John Groundland
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Primary Osteosarcoma ◽  
Anatomic Locations

Introduction. Osteosarcoma is the most common sarcoma of bone. Pelvic osteosarcoma presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to potential late symptom onset, metastatic dissemination at diagnosis, and inherent difficulties of wide surgical resection secondary to the complex and critical anatomy of the pelvis. The rates of survival are well reported for osteosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton, but specific details regarding presentation and survival are less known for osteosarcoma of the pelvis. Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program was queried for primary osteosarcoma of the bony pelvis from 2004 to 2015. Cases with Collaborative Staging variables (available after 2004) were analyzed by grade, histologic subtype, surgical intervention, tumor size, tumor extension, and presence of metastasis at diagnosis. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were assessed with respect to these variables. The SEER database was then queried for age, tumor size, surgical intervention, metastasis at time of presentation, and survivorship data for patients with primary osteosarcoma of the upper extremity, lower extremity, vertebrae, thorax, and face/skull, and rates for all anatomic locations were then compared to patients with primary pelvic osteosarcoma. Results. A total of 292 cases of pelvic osteosarcoma were identified from 2004 to 2015 within the database, representing 9.8% of cases among all surveyed primary sites. The most common histologic subtype was osteoblastic osteosarcoma (69.9%), followed by chondroblastic osteosarcoma (22.3%). The majority of cases were high-grade tumors (94.3%), of size >8 cm (72.0%), and with extension beyond the originating bone (74.0%). For the entire pelvic osteosarcoma group, the 2-, 5-, 10-year survival rates were 45.6%, 26.5%, and 21.4%, respectively, which were the poorest among surveyed anatomic sites. The 5-year overall survival was an abysmal 5.3% for patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 37.0% for non-metastatic pelvic osteosarcoma treated with surgery and chemotherapy. When compared to other locations, pelvic osteosarcoma had higher rates of metastatic disease at presentation (33.5%), larger median tumor size (11.0 cm), and older median age at diagnosis (47.5 years). While over 85% of patients with tumors at the extremities received surgery, only 47.4% of pelvic osteosarcomas in this cohort received surgical resection—likely influenced by larger tumor size, sacral involvement, frequency of metastasis, older age, or delayed referral to a sarcoma center. Conclusion. This study clarifies presenting features and clinical outcomes of pelvic osteosarcomas, which often present with large, high-grade tumors with extracompartmental extension, high likelihood of metastatic disease at diagnosis, and a potential limited ability to be addressed surgically. The survival rates of primary osteosarcoma of the pelvis are poor and are lower than osteosarcomas from other anatomic locations. While acknowledging the influence of metastasis, tumor characteristics, and advanced age on the decision to undergo surgical excision of a pelvic osteosarcoma, the rates of surgical resection are low and highlight the importance of understanding appropriate conditions for oncologic resection of pelvic sarcomas.

Resection margin distance in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: How much is enough?

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 455-455
Author(s):  
Amir A. Rahnemai-Azar ◽  
Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly ◽  
Daniel Abbott ◽  
Cecilia Grace Ethun ◽  
George A. Poultsides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
The Impact

455 Background: Surgical resection is required for curative treatment of patients with extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EH-CCA). The objective of this study was to determine if the distance of surgical margin was associated with outcome. Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for EH-CCA between 2000 and 2015 at 10 hepatobiliary centers across the U.S. were evaluated using prospectively collected data. Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to evaluate the influence of the extent of the margin on outcome. Results: 538 patients with EH-CCA who underwent curative-intent resection were included: 383 (71%) undergoing R0 resection, 153 (28%) undergoing R1 resection, and 2 with R2 resection. A negative surgical margin (R0) was associated with improved recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (RFS: 10.5% vs. 3.6% (R1) and OS: 25.8% vs. 9.3% (R1). Subsequently, further analysis on 161 patients with complete data on distance of resection margin, all undergoing R0 resection, was performed to assess the impact of extent of margin on outcome. On multi-variable analysis, the resection margin distance, analyzed as a continuous variable, was not associated with either improved RFS (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96-1.05; p 0.71) or OS (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.01; p 0.49). Increasing age, increased tumor size, and LN metastasis were identified as independent predictors of OS; while RFS were mainly dependent on tumor size and LN metastasis (Table). Conclusions: Achieving R0 resection is acceptable for EH-CCA tumors, and obtaining additional margin does not confer a benefit on overall survival. Increasing age, tumor size, and LN metastasis are independent predictors of RFS and OS, but increased margin width is not associated with improvement in either. Multivariable analysis of factors affecting OS of patients with extra-hepatic CCA who underwent surgical resection, with significant factors noted in bold. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document