scholarly journals Evolution of microbiological and chemical parameters during red wine making with extended post-fermentation maceration

2014 ◽  
Vol 171 ◽  
pp. 84-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Francesca ◽  
Raffaele Romano ◽  
Ciro Sannino ◽  
Laura Le Grottaglie ◽  
Luca Settanni ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 563 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique García-Puente Rivas ◽  
Cristina Alcalde-Eon ◽  
Celestino Santos-Buelga ◽  
Julián C. Rivas-Gonzalo ◽  
M. Teresa Escribano-Bailón
Keyword(s):  
Red Wine ◽  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 603-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Jun He ◽  
Fu-Liang Han ◽  
Qing-Quan Yu ◽  
Qiu-Hong Pan ◽  
Chang-Qing Duan ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Servili ◽  
Alberto L Begliomini ◽  
Gianfrancesco Montedoro ◽  
Maurizio Petruccioli ◽  
Federico Federici

Author(s):  
Т.А. ДРОЗДОВА ◽  
А.П. БИРЮКОВ ◽  
Н.Ю. КАЧАЕВА ◽  
Р.А. ДРОЗДОВ

Определены физико-химические показатели 12 образцов сухих и полусладких белых и красных столовых вин, выработанных одним предприятием и разлитых в стеклобутылку (СБ), бутылку из полиэтилентерефталата и упаковку «пакет в коробке» (ПВК) в феврале 2018 г. холодным и горячим способами, с целью установления влияния упаковки на изменение органолептического состава и физико-химических показателей столовых вин. Физико-химический анализ и дегустация представленных образцов столовых вин проведены в марте 2018 г. с использованием общепринятых методик. Установлено, что через месяц после розлива в упаковку все опытные образцы соответствовали требованиям действующей нормативной документации на данный вид продукции и обладали оптимальными физико-химическими показателями, кроме образца полусладкого красного вина в СБ, который на момент анализа был подвержен микробиологическому воздействию. Во всех исследованных образцах столовых вин обнаружен 1,2-пропиленгликоль, но его содержание не превышало допустимых норм. По итогам дегустации для сухих столовых вин рекомендован розлив в СБ, поскольку холодный розлив, применяемый при этом виде упаковки, практически не влияет на изменение органолептических характеристик продукта. Для полусладких вин рекомендуется горячий розлив, поскольку он препятствует забраживанию и задушке вина, а розлив в упаковку ПВК позволяет сохранять качество вина. Physico-chemical parameters of 12 samples of dry and semi-sweet white and red table wines produced by one enterprise and poured into a glass bottle (GB), a bottle of polyethylene terephthalate and a bag-in-box in February 2018 by cold and hot methods were determined in order to establish the influence of packaging on the change in the organoleptic composition and physico-chemical characteristics of table wines. Physical and chemical analysis and tasting of the presented samples of table wines were carried out in March 2018 using generally accepted methods. It was found that a month after filling in the package, all prototypes met the requirements of the current regulatory documentation for this type of product and had optimal physico-chemical parameters, except for the sample of semi-sweet red wine in the GB, which at the time of analysis was exposed to microbiological effects. In all the studied samples of table wines 1,2-propylene glycol was found, but its content did not exceed the permissible norms. Following the results of the tasting, bottling in the GB is recommended for dry table wines, since the cold bottling used in this type of packaging practically does not affect the change in the organoleptic characteristics of the product. For sweet wines it is recommended that hot-filling because it prevents fermenting and suffocating wine and bottling in bag-in-box allows to preserve the quality of the wine.


2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke OKUBO ◽  
Nami GOTO(YAMAMOTO) ◽  
Naoto OKAZAKI
Keyword(s):  
Red Wine ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 18-23
Author(s):  
Huma Bokkhim ◽  
Praksha Neupane ◽  
Smita Gurung ◽  
Rojeena Shrestha

A study was carried out on encapsulation of wine yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its use in wine making compared to free yeast. Rehydrated active dry yeast was encapsulated in a 2% sodium alginate solution, cross linked with different molar concentration of CaCl2 solution (0.1, 0.2, 0.3,0.4 and 0.5M) for 30 minutes. The molar concentration with minimum cell leakage (0.2M) was used for yeast encapsulation. Colony count (CFU/ml) was analyzed for both free yeast (FY) and encapsulated yeast (EY) so as to equilibrate the rate of yeast pitching in wine fermentation. Physico-chemical properties; total soluble solids (T.S.S.), acidity and pH of red and white grapes were analyzed and were found to be 16.4±0.10oBx, 0.38±0.02% and 3.90±0.02 for white grapes and 19±0.15oBx, 0.64±0.01% and 3.1±0.10 for red grapes. During the fermentation process in both wines, a gradual reduction in T.S.S. was noted while an alternate of increase and decrease trend in acidity was noted which finally stabilized after 12 days. The final T.S.S. of wines was not significantly different for yeast types but higher values were noted for red wine (FY, 7.11±0.26 & EY, 7.33±0.19) than for white wine (FY, 6.1±0.10 & EY, 6.2±0.10). Similar trend was noted for final acidity of red wine (FY, 0.83±0.01 & EY, 0.84±0.02%). Though, no significant effect of yeast type on alcohol production was noted, the average alcohol content of red (FY, 13.22±0.26% & EY, 13.72±0.44%) and white (FY, 9.21±0.21% & EY, 9.64±0.38%) wine were found to be significantly different. However, wine prepared from EY was less turbid (Red wine, 95 NTU & White wine, 140 NTU) and had higher clarity (L*) than wine from FY. So, from this study it was concluded that encapsulating wine yeast does not affect its fermenting capability but will aid in production of less turbid wine which will definitely simplify the filtration process.


2004 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 1357-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Argyris Tsakiris ◽  
Vasillios Sipsas ◽  
Argyro Bekatorou ◽  
Athanasios Mallouchos ◽  
Athanasios A. Koutinas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document