Perceived threat or perceived benefit? Immigrants’ perception of how Finns tend to perceive them

Keluhan pada organ reproduksi yang sering terjadi adalah Pruritus vulvae yaitu ditandai dengan adanya sensasi gatal parah dari alat kelamin perempuan. Pruritus vulvae disebabkan oleh jamur, bakteri dan virus yang muncul 44% karena buruknya Personal Hygiene dan Hygiene Menstruasi. Penelitian Tahun 2015 di 4 wilayah di Indonesia yaitu di Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT), Jawa Timur, Papua, dan Sulawesi Selatan terkait kebersihan saat menstruasi menemukan 67% remaja di kota dan 41% remaja di desa masih adanya perilaku negatif. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui beberapa faktor yang berhubungan dengan perilaku hygiene menstruasi melalui Health Belief Model (HBM). Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan cross sectional dengan sampel sebanyak 101 siswi SMPN 244 di Jakarta Utara, dianalisis secara univariat dan bivariat menggunakan chi square. Perilaku Hygiene Menstruasi baik baru dilakukan 55,4% responden. Perilaku Hygiene Menstruasi berhubungan secara signifikan dengan pengetahuan (OR=5,1), perceived threat (OR=3,9) dan perceived benefit (OR=3,3) dengan P Value < 0.005. Health Belief Model (HBM) bisa dipertimbangkan sebagai suatu pendekatan dalam upaya memperbaiki perilaku hygiene menstruasi pada remaja. Peningkatan pengetahuan direkomendasikan dengan menekankan pada ancaman penyakit yang berkaitan dengan perilaku hygiene menstruasi dan manfaat-manfaat yang langsung dirasakan oleh remaja berkenaan dengan perilaku higiene menstruasi.

Download Full-text

Factors Correlated with the Intention of Iron Tablet Consumption among Female Adolescents

Jurnal NERS ◽

10.20473/jn.v13i1.8368 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 13 (1) ◽

pp. 122

Author(s):

Riri Aprianti ◽

Gadis Meinar Sari ◽

Tiyas Kusumaningrum

Keyword(s):

Self Efficacy ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Female Adolescent ◽

Female Adolescents ◽

Perceived Threat ◽

Chi Square ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Perceived Susceptibility ◽

Perceived Benefit ◽

Perceived Seriousness

Introduction: Anaemia in female adolescents tends to have a negative impact that is likely to later arise in pregnancy, labour and childbirth. The prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia in female adolescents in Indonesia is thirty percent. Indonesia runs an iron tablet program for female adolescents. However, with the running of the program, it is not clear what factors are correlated with the intention of iron tablet consumption among female adolescents. The purpose of this study was to analyse the factors correlated with the intention of iron tablet consumption among female adolescents.Methods: This research used a cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 100 students in senior high school in Surabaya, chosen by proportional random sampling. The independent variables were parent income, knowledge, perceived susceptibility, perceived seriousness, perceived threats, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and perceived self-efficacy. The dependent variable was female adolescent intention related to consuming iron tablets. The data was collected using a questionnaire and analysed by a chi square test with a level of significance α<0.05.Results: There was a significant correlation between perceived threat (p=0.02), perceived benefit (p=0.01), perceived barrier (p=0.02) and perceived self-efficacy (p=0.00) and female adolescent intention related to consuming iron tablets. There was no correlation between parental income, adolescent knowledge, perceived susceptibility, and perceived seriousness with the intention to consume iron tablets.Conclusion: From this research, it has been concluded that the factors related to the intention to consume iron tablets in female adolescents were perceived threat, perceived benefit, perceived barrier and perceived self-efficacy. Increasing the confidence of female adolescents in association with the importance of avoiding anaemia by consuming iron tablets is crucial so then they can maintain their health and prevent diseases due to anaemia later on.

Download Full-text

Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan dengan Konsumsi Tablet Tambah Darah (TTD) pada Remaja Putri di Indonesia: Literatur Review

Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan ◽

10.24853/jkk.15.2.119-129 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 15 (2) ◽

pp. 119

Author(s):

Nelda Amir ◽

Kusharisupeni Djokosujono

Keyword(s):

Self Efficacy ◽

Perceived Threat ◽

Perceived Susceptibility ◽

Perceived Benefit

Anemia Gizi Besi (AGB) mempunyai dampak yang serius, baik pada ibu hamil maupun pada remaja. Sangat penting mengatasi anemia pada remaja putri agar masalah anemia tidak berlanjut ketika hamil, salah satunya dengan mengonsumsi Tablet Tambah Darah (TTD) yang mengandung 60 mg Fe elemental dan 0,4 mg asam folat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat faktor-faktor apa saja yang berhubungan dengan konsumsi TTD pada remaja putri di Indonesia. Studi penelitian ini adalah literatur review dengan mengekstrak semua penelitian di Indonesia tentang faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan konsumsi TTD pada remaja putri (11-19 tahun) di Indonesia. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan konsumsi TTD pada remaja putri di Indonesia yaitu dukungan guru (p=0,000 OR=4,7), sikap (p=0,031 OR=2,192), budaya (p=0,012 OR=2,517), dukungan keluarga (p=0,029), perceived threat (p=0,02), perceived benefit (p=0,01), perceived barrier (p=0,02), dan self efficacy (p=0,00). Faktor yang tidak berhubungan yaitu pengetahuan, daya beli, ketersediaan, dukungan orang tua, pendapatan orang tua, perceived susceptibility (persepsi kerentanan), seriousness (keseriusan/keparahan). Faktor yang paling banyak diteliti yaitu tentang pengetahuan dan dukungan orang tua. Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kepatuhan remaja putri dalam mengonsumsi TTD di Indonesia yaitu dukungan guru, sikap, budaya, dukungan keluarga, perceived threat (ancaman yang dirasakan), perceived benefit (manfaat yang dirasakan), perceived barrier (hambatan yang dirasakan), dan self efficacy. Kata kunci: konsumsi tablet tambah darah, remaja putri, anemia

Download Full-text

Influences of Peer Support Group and Psychosocio- Economic Determinants on Treatment Compliance in Hiv/Aids Patients in Sragen, Central Java

Childhood Stunting, Wasting, and Obesity, as the Critical Global Health Issues: Forging Cross-Sectoral Solutions ◽

10.26911/the7thicph.02.59 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yusuf Bachtiyar Lobis ◽

◽

Bhisma Murti ◽

Hanung Prasetya ◽

◽

...

Keyword(s):

Family Support ◽

Peer Support ◽

Negative Attitude ◽

Treatment Compliance ◽

Perceived Threat ◽

Perceived Susceptibility ◽

Central Java ◽

Perceived Benefit ◽

Perceived Seriousness ◽

Hiv Aids

Background: Adherence to treatment is important to reduce viral replication, improve clinical and immunological conditions, reduce the risk of developing ARV resistance, and reduce the risk of HIV transmission. Peer support is suspected to be one of the factors driving drug intake adherence in patients with chronic disease. This study aimed to examine the influences of peer support and psychosocio-economic determinants on treatment compliance in HIV/AIDS patients. Subjects and Method: This was a case control design study conducted in Sragen, Central Java, Indonesia. A sample of 200 people with HIV/AIDS (PLWH) was selected by fixed disease sampling. The dependent variable was treatment compliance. The independent variables were knowledge toward HIV/AIDS, perceived benefit, perceived belief, perceived threat, perceived susceptibility, perceived seriousness, perceived barrier, attitude, indirect experience, family support, and peer support. The data were obtained from medical record and questionnaire. The data were analyzed by a multiple logistic regression run on Stata 13. Results: Treatment compliance increased with strong peer support (b= 1.34; 95% CI= 0.31 to 2.38; p= 0.011), strong family support (b= 1.09; 95% CI= 0.16 to 2.02; p= 0.021), knowledge toward HIV/AIDS (b= 1.65; 95% CI= 0.67 to 2.64; p= 0.001), high perceived benefit (b= 1.23; 95% CI= 0.28 to 2.18; p= 0.011), perceived belief (b= 2.05; 95% CI= 0.98 to 3.12; p<0.001), and high perceived threat (b= 1.22; 95% CI= 0.30 to 2.13; p= 0.009). Treatment compliance decreased with negative attitude (b= -2.47; 95% CI= -3.58 to -1.37; p <0.001), low perceived susceptibility (b= -1.26; 95% CI= -2.24 to – 0.27; p= 0.012), low perceived seriousness (b= -1.11; 95% CI= -2.06 to -0.16; p=0.021), high perceived barrier (b= -1.76; 95% CI= -2.81 to -0.70; p= 0.001), and indirect experience (b= -1.10; 95% CI= -2.05 to -0.14; p= 0.024). Conclusion: Treatment compliance increases with strong peer support, strong family support, high knowledge toward HIV/AIDS, high perceived benefit, perceived belief, and high perceived threat. Treatment compliances decrease with negative attitude, low perceived susceptibility, low perceived seriousness, high perceived barrier, and indirect experience. Keywords: HIV/AIDS, treatment compliance, peer support, psychosocial economy Correspondence: Yusuf Bachtiyar Lobis. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret. Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Central Java. Email: [email protected]. Mobile: +628111388841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.02.59

Download Full-text

Quota Women Are Threatening to Men

Swiss Journal of Psychology ◽

10.1024/1421-0185/a000195 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 76 (3) ◽

pp. 107-116 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Klea Faniko ◽

Till Burckhardt ◽

Oriane Sarrasin ◽

Fabio Lorenzi-Cioldi ◽

Siri Øyslebø Sørensen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Organizational Performance ◽

Gender Stereotypes ◽

Perceived Threat ◽

Preferential Treatment ◽

Public Sector Employees ◽

Different Types ◽

Low Levels ◽

Women In Decision Making ◽

The Impact

Abstract. Two studies carried out among Albanian public-sector employees examined the impact of different types of affirmative action policies (AAPs) on (counter)stereotypical perceptions of women in decision-making positions. Study 1 (N = 178) revealed that participants – especially women – perceived women in decision-making positions as more masculine (i.e., agentic) than feminine (i.e., communal). Study 2 (N = 239) showed that different types of AA had different effects on the attribution of gender stereotypes to AAP beneficiaries: Women benefiting from a quota policy were perceived as being more communal than agentic, while those benefiting from weak preferential treatment were perceived as being more agentic than communal. Furthermore, we examined how the belief that AAPs threaten men’s access to decision-making positions influenced the attribution of these traits to AAP beneficiaries. The results showed that men who reported high levels of perceived threat, as compared to men who reported low levels of perceived threat, attributed more communal than agentic traits to the beneficiaries of quotas. These findings suggest that AAPs may have created a backlash against its beneficiaries by emphasizing gender-stereotypical or counterstereotypical traits. Thus, the framing of AAPs, for instance, as a matter of enhancing organizational performance, in the process of policy making and implementation, may be a crucial tool to countering potential backlash.

Download Full-text